Jump to content

What tuning changes are needed to run E85 on the 2015 6.2


kgkern01

Recommended Posts

Posted

Only thing I’m looking to gain is a cleanup, hasn’t stained the tip of my stainless steel exhaust pipe since I’ve started mixing E85 and runs great! There seems to be a slight improvement in throttle response, noticed my 6.2 being a bit more snappy and chirping tires more frequently since I’ve been mixing it. Again, main reason I’m mixing it is for its cleaning properties. Lots of people swear by it, I too have noticed it. I’m sure it would need specific tuning to get the most out of it but I didn’t buy this truck to race it, I’d get into something factory supercharged if that was the case.


Sent from Above

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Sorry to bring back an old thread but I keep getting mixed answers and there seems to be people here that may be able to answer my question. On the non Flex 5.3 trucks is it just the sensor that is required? Or is a tune absolutely necessary to move over the flex tables as was mentioned for the 6.2 owner in this thread? I have seen at least two other threads where people have said the sensor was recognized automatically in the 5.3 trucks, and several who say tuning has to be done.  I have a 2018 5.3 6 speed non flex.I Have the sensor and lines ready to install, and would rather not tune right now if it isn’t necessary.

Posted

A tune is a must, there is no way around that.

 

Flex fuel is disabled from the factory and none of the correct parameters are populated within the tune from the get go.

Posted
47 minutes ago, CamGTP said:

A tune is a must, there is no way around that.

 

Flex fuel is disabled from the factory and none of the correct parameters are populated within the tune from the get go.

Thank you for the response. Just to clarify for myself and anyone who comes across this searching for info, that goes for both the 5.3 and 6.2 trucks correct? It was a 5.3 owner that swore the sensor was reading automatically on a 2017. It would make sense to me for the flex and non flex to have the same tuning from the factory just different hardware (sensor). 

Posted
2 hours ago, okiepumper92 said:

Thank you for the response. Just to clarify for myself and anyone who comes across this searching for info, that goes for both the 5.3 and 6.2 trucks correct? It was a 5.3 owner that swore the sensor was reading automatically on a 2017. It would make sense to me for the flex and non flex to have the same tuning from the factory just different hardware (sensor). 

Yes, for both engines a tune is required to turn on the tables to run E85.  Those that said it isn't my question would be how do they know unless they can see it in their tune.  I added the sensor to our 2016 Suburban and then had Black Bear Performance tune it.  After the tune was installed, I sent them back a data log for him to confirm that the ECM was seeing what the sensor was reading the E85.

 

Running E85 without a tune with sensor doesn't do anything but give you a cleaner burning engine and is not recommended to run it 100%.  I mix it at no more than a 50/50 mix on my non flex fuel 2002 Silverado 5.3.

Posted
5 hours ago, Black02Silverado said:

Yes, for both engines a tune is required to turn on the tables to run E85.  Those that said it isn't my question would be how do they know unless they can see it in their tune.  I added the sensor to our 2016 Suburban and then had Black Bear Performance tune it.  After the tune was installed, I sent them back a data log for him to confirm that the ECM was seeing what the sensor was reading the E85.

 

Running E85 without a tune with sensor doesn't do anything but give you a cleaner burning engine and is not recommended to run it 100%.  I mix it at no more than a 50/50 mix on my non flex fuel 2002 Silverado 5.3.

I can’t find the thread again but apparently they could feel the “gainz” lmao. I found this last night, Proof that a tune is required.

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Sad thing is that this doesn't have to be the case. LSPI can be solved without a reduction in TBN. Swap Ca for Mg.  Cats are not a issue if the OEM can get a ring and valve guide seal even at SN levels of SAPS. Dizzy is purring like a kitten with a bowl of warm milk. 200K of Full SAPS oil and zero detonation issues and nice a clean inside and out. This shouldn't be an issue. It isn't 1920.    Tell ya what AMSOIL SS is excellent at, internal cleanliness. The new formula is even a step up from their already outstanding cleanliness levels. Can't say the OEM offering is quite that clean. There marketing suggest the SS is cleaner.     That is the only defense with at shelf oil. Nothing wrong with them if you ignore the marketing and OEM 'recommended' OCI and use a thimble full of common sense. 😉 You go sir. 
    • I started with a folding cover by BAK PAC on my 2500. It went bad after close to 5 years. Bent and vinyl coming loose. Contacted BAK and they gave me a very good discount on a Revolver. Had it a number of years. Mostly outdoor storage. Some garage storage. Vinyl started to come loose. Still under warranty so they replaced to cover. Sold the 2500, bought the 1500 and got another revolver for it. Had it a couple years now and no issues. I store it indoors. Got a bit of discount when buying it as well. If you are seeing problems, contact BAK or real truck and let them know. Customer service was pretty good. But I think they changed their warranty.
    • I agree, there is no one answer fits all as every rig is different, one may be pulling some little aluminum fishing boat while another is towing a monstrosity that weighs a lot and hopefully the owner if the rig has some prior experience to know what drive mode they should choose.    It also struck me and this is from watching a few of those boat ramp escapades videos in the past, Ford being one of the vehicles that has the auto front axle hubs and sure enough its found out that one hub has crapped out and won't engage and may not have manual hubs to even select on both sides so they are on the boat ramp stuck with no four wheel drive and spinning .... they flat out need a tow to get up the ramp and deal with the vehicles new found issues. That can happen to all brands of pickup, finding out either four wheel drive or 4 low isn't working right at the time its needed it to work as some electronic crap has failed. 
    • Its possible you never had the joy of the crappy boat launches we tend to have around here or really some of them are just grades down to the river if its a river scenario and the conditions change all the time with the river levels and silt deposits. Some of the lakes we went to years ago, there was no such thing as a cement pad that went down into the water that the trailer stayed on, it was gravel maybe up to the water line and then duck crap much beyond that so sinking the boat tires into mud. Of course some of the more established lakes had a cement bar type boat ramp but sometimes it was covered in green slime closer and certainly within the water and a two wheel drive had all sorts of fun if one had to touch that slime with the rear tires.    A neighbor of mine had made a comment years back with his chev truck that was probably about the same year as yours but a half ton extended cab 4x4 and he a a fiberglass boat with an inboard so it wasn't a feather weight and he had gone out to one of the large popular lakes in the area and don't ask me how this happened but he was in two wheel drive as he figured he didn't require four wheel drive for that boat ramp and somehow upon pulling the boat out he twisted one of his drive axles. I suspect it must have spun and then grabbed on the cement ramp and shocked it to the degree of twisting it. He would have had the standard 8.5 or whatever it was axle housing as the 9.5 ring gear like my truck has also has larger drive axles as far as I know. Anyway he was feeling a vibration driving home and had it checked out and a shop found that the tire/hub was wobbling because of the axle had twisted so in went a new drive axle. After that bad experience he said he made sure to put it into four wheel drive to lower the stress on the rear axle. Of course that is where an HD truck can handle a lot more stress and no doubt these newer half tons with their larger ring gears probably have larger drive axles as well to match vs back in the day. 
    • Desirable - as in does someone WANT one, aspire to have one. Could reasonably buy any car they want and CHOOSE these instead.    I didn't watch the video, why did they win?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...