Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

You can check out this forum. https://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=415251

 

Check it out there is a lot of info to be there..

 

There is a Chevy sales person (site sponsor) who will get you a status update but she needs an order number. US dealers cannot get anything on Canadian orders.  She only can give you the status code. She can't (nor can anyone at GM Chat) see anything about the order, just what stage its in per the system. 

 

The system updates overnight and is down on Sundays for routine maintenance (no access), so the next update will occur overnight Monday next week. The system is internal GM and not intended for public consumption. 

Edited by elcamino
Posted
On 2/22/2020 at 3:47 PM, redwngr said:

If you have the order number, and are in the US, GM chat can/will help you.

 

If in Canada, the info will only be given to the dealer...

 

It's not a 'live' update, as that isn't the real purpose of the system.

Best guess as to time from 3400 to 5000.....???

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, dadztoy said:

Best guess as to time from 3400 to 5000.....???

Too many variables in transportation to guess + you're at the mercy of the railroad. 

Obviously some locations will have much quicker deliveries than others.

 

As important as we think 'our' truck is, at somewhere around 1,000,000 pickups per year, that's about 4000 trucks/day that shippers are dealing with. 

 

I don't know what 'average delivery time would be, but if it's 3 weeks, then they've got 1,000,000year / 50weeks * 3 week average is about 60,000 on the move at any given time. 

 

 

 

 

Edited by redwngr
Posted

I ordered mine this morning 2020 Chevy Silverado LTZ Z71. I was told it would be built in FT Wayne and it should be here in 6-8 weeks. I want to thank all of you great people I have read near everyone posts for the last year or so. I was hell bend on a RST just could not order what I wanted had to go the LTZ route. I'm coming from a Black edition 2017 Chevy Silverado so I guess I have had enough all black and a little chrome might be nice

Posted
2 hours ago, mcgee500 said:

I ordered mine this morning 2020 Chevy Silverado LTZ Z71. I was told it would be built in FT Wayne and it should be here in 6-8 weeks. I want to thank all of you great people I have read near everyone posts for the last year or so. I was hell bend on a RST just could not order what I wanted had to go the LTZ route. I'm coming from a Black edition 2017 Chevy Silverado so I guess I have had enough all black and a little chrome might be nice

Congrats!

 

Double cab?

Posted

Yes a double cab. My kind of truck, my rear seats are folded up 99.9% of the time and I would like to not let anyone ride in the back ever. That space is for my stuff. All the great info I got on this site the dealer was even impressed I seem to know a lot about what I was ordering. This will be my last truck after 5 years or so I think maybe a Cadillac before I die. Never though I could afford a Cadillac but after buying a $53871.00 truck just maybe I can. This web site has a vast network of all things Chevrolet/ GMC truck. I read here a few hours every night.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, fishlessam said:

My truck was built on FEB 10 as per GM,waiting on delivery.

Do you know where it was built? I know the farther away from you can mean it has to be put on rail cars and can take awhile. I asked the dealership how long and they said 6-10 weeks but it could be longer. I'm not sure they really know. Good luck bud.

Posted
29 minutes ago, mcgee500 said:

Do you know where it was built? I know the farther away from you can mean it has to be put on rail cars and can take awhile. I asked the dealership how long and they said 6-10 weeks but it could be longer. I'm not sure they really know. Good luck bud.

My truck was built in fort wayne and was shipped by rail to a rail yard just north of Toronto. It took 3 weeks to arrive and take delivery once it was built and that time includes rail corridor closures due to pipeline protests.

Posted

I'm about 2 hours east of Flint.

It was still shipped by train. 

 

From when the order placed, more time was used by for train /truck/dealer than the time it took Flint to get it built.

 

 

Posted

I'm sure you don't here this very often I don't want it in 6 weeks I need more time. I'm 20 miles north of Grand Rapids, MI. I was told that they all come by truck and it would be at least 8 weeks but don't bet on it more like 10 weeks. I guess you take what you get then. Sure I'll be happy either way. Just would be nice to have my 2017 gone by then.

Posted
6 hours ago, mcgee500 said:

Do you know where it was built? I know the farther away from you can mean it has to be put on rail cars and can take awhile. I asked the dealership how long and they said 6-10 weeks but it could be longer. I'm not sure they really know. Good luck bud.

Don't know where it was built,when the order was placed they say 8-10 weeks until i see it or longer.

Posted (edited)

The dealer has no way of knowing with certainty how long it will take to get built and delivered.  They are all just giving a best guess estimate based on prior experience.   But many things can affect this;  work stoppages, parts shortages, option constraints, logistics, mother nature, and the most important delay, dealer allocations.

 

I forget where I got this but it explains the process;

Quote

1100 and Dealer Allocation
This causes a lot of issues. When you place an order with a dealer, the status is 1100. UNTIL Chevrolet ACCEPTS the order, it just sits there at 1100. You don't have an order with GM at this point. You only have a dealer requesting an allocation for a slot in the production schedule. Dealer Allocation is simple to understand - GM changed its model for producing vehicles a few years' back. Dealers are now awarded allocation based on past performance, as well as other factors. If you are sitting at 1100 you are not in line yet for production. Your dealer MUST get GM to accept the order. When GM accepts the order, all the parts are available and will be allocated to your car build.

 

First, many dealers do not understand the allocation process.

 

Second, dealers are told at the beginning of every model year the number of units they are expected to order. This is their Guide Number, so called because it is intended to help a dealer "floor plan."

Third, many dealers confuse Guide Number with Allocation.

Fourth, dealers are told every other Thursday how many Allocations (a portion of the Guide Number) they can use over the following two weeks AND this number of orders will be divided over two weeks.

To summarize, say the dealer is given 50 units as a Guide,  that means about 1 unit every weekly ordering process from 2 units awarded in the every other week ordering process. If the dealer sells a dozen Camaros every year, change the 50 to 12 and reduce the bi-weekly consensus to conform. By the way, this awkward system meets laws and demands of court decisions.

When will my car ship?

You have better chances of picking winning lottery numbers than to know for sure when your car will ship. When you combine the QC issues with geographical delivery of cars (at the lowest possible cost so they need to aggregate deliveries - and they don't not use a first in first out methodology), this can be the most frustrating part of the whole SRE journey. There is no transparency to actual data. There is just generic codes and sometimes the whisper from "someone in the know". Your car may ship quickly, it may not. It will likely take longer the more rural you are and the lower the volume of cars your dealer sells.


 

 

Edited by elcamino
Posted (edited)

My dealer explained the allocated process to me when I ordered. And I knew to ask about this by reading something on this forum. They said they had 7 more allocated gas 1500 trucks and that they were changing 1 of them to my order to make sure I get my truck. I have been dealing with the same dealer and salesman for 20 years they are very good to me.

 

 

 

 

Edited by mcgee500
off topic
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 417 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...