Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

So I installed a Banks iDash yesterday and to my 2020 Chevy 1500 Duramax out for a drive today.  I saw pretty consistent 280-285 oil temps with normal unloaded driving.   I’m concerned this is rather high for an oil temp, ECT (engine coolant temps) were in the 200-217 range. 
 

Are theses EOT (engine oil temps) high, should I be concerned?  

Edited by Kkajvr6
Posted

56 views and no comments?  Well today the temp got up to 291, I’ll be calling the dealer tomorrow. 

Posted

I just got the 3.0L duramax.  I wouldnt bat an eye at oil temps.  

 

Diesels are nasty suckers on oil. Fresh oil turns grey in minutes.  I presume the turbo is oil cooled, so there's a major hotspot.

 

Just use good synthetic oil.

 

 

Posted

I'm pretty sure this engine is designed to run hot, especially when NOT under load.  It helps with the emissions.  When you are towing, you should see temps come down (sounds odd I know).  Check out Chad Ivan on YouTube he shows this across a couple different videos.

Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, Kkajvr6 said:

56 views and no comments?  Well today the temp got up to 291, I’ll be calling the dealer tomorrow. 

Got to remember this is a brand new Engine. 1 day and 56 views with no comments is pretty normal. Not a whole lot of people with it and not a whole lot of information out there on it.

 

It appears the duramax also has "Active Thermal Management" which is a valve that distributes hot coolant to parts of the engine that need to warm up. I Wonder if this is some kind of disconnect between your iDash and what the truck really thinks the temperature is. Youre not showing anything on the dash? Does the display show anything about engine temps or oil temps?

Edited by Jetiemann
Posted (edited)

The truck probably has it's own engine oil temp display.  2020 Acadia gasser has one.

 

Maybe some of the other 3.0L owners will pipe in with what temps they are seeing.  

 

Oil temp is one of the things they use to determine if the auto start/stop will function.  Engine computer program will be programmed to give a warning if temp is too high.  

 

This engine has TWO engine oil temp sensors --- according to the 'information' bulletin from last fall .

(and about 7 engine coolant temperature sensors)

 

Cooling System
Overview
The Duramax® 3.0L utilizes GM’s advanced cooling
system strategy known as Active Thermal Management
(ATM). ATM distributes coolant through the engine in a
targeted manner, sending heat where it’s needed to
warm up the engine, thereby reducing friction. It
promotes quicker heating of the passenger
compartment as needed and engine cooling when
needed during high power operation. The system uses
a conventional engine-driven coolant pump. The ECM
controls the complete ATM system using feedback from
various sensors.
The engine has numerous engine coolant temperature
(ECT) sensors placed at specific locations throughout
the cooling system as follows:
– Engine Block Coolant Temperature Sensor
– Engine Cylinder Head Coolant Temperature Sensor
– Engine Inlet Coolant Temperature Sensor
– Engine Outlet Coolant Temperature Sensor
– Radiator Outlet Coolant Temperature Sensor
– Heater Core Inlet Coolant Temperature Sensor
– Heater Core Outlet Coolant Temperature Sensor
Additional sensors used by the ECM to control the ATM
system are:
– Engine Oil Temperature Sensor 1 and Sensor 2
– Transmission Oil Temperature Sensor
– Control Valve Sensors

 

 

Edited by redwngr
Posted

I've watched Chad Ivan's YouTube videos where he records his gauges while driving. His oil temps were around 225-233F and coolant around 215F.

 

Are you able to view engine oil temp through the DIC? I know I can't on my 14 Sierra but can through my ScanGauge. My engine oil temps are usually pretty close to coolant temps (196-206F depending on outside temps). Seems the 3.0 Duramax wants to run a little warmer but 280F seems pretty high (especially for 0W-20 oil).

Posted (edited)

So I went back and watched some of Chad Ivan’s videos they show oil temps around 225, truck is headed to the dealer tomorrow.  I have the iDash and the TorqPro app like Chad is using, 280-290 oil temps is way too high.  Should only see a 10-20 degree variation between coolant and oil temps. 

Edited by Kkajvr6
Posted

Banks called me today, they are seeing similar readings on their test mule. They are analyzing the data and working on a firmware update to correct the value. 

Posted

Update, didn’t take the truck in today.  I chatted with Chad Ivan on YouTube yesterday he recommend using the generic PID vs the GM PID in TorquePro app.  Well from a cold start the generic value read 74 the GM value was 177, coolant and trans temp were 73-77 range.  Do definitely a bad scaling of the value coming off the ECU in the GM PID.  Shared this data with Banks as well.  My truck is fine, drove it around this event temps were within 10 of the coolant temp.  

Posted
On 4/6/2020 at 4:41 AM, SkiDooNick700 said:

I'm pretty sure this engine is designed to run hot, especially when NOT under load.  It helps with the emissions.  When you are towing, you should see temps come down (sounds odd I know).  Check out Chad Ivan on YouTube he shows this across a couple different videos.

It has very interesting heating/cooling properties or thermal management of engine and accessories.  The High temps are indeed for efficiency purposes.  Most of us are just BROW BEAT...COOL,COOL keep it cool.  we have learned much more about the temp/efficiency in last few years.  GM ROCKED THIS 3.0L  I am jealous! 

  • Like 1
  • 3 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,629 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...