Jump to content

2006 sierra no start, pcm failure?


badbowtie1982

Recommended Posts

Posted

ill start with some background info, truck is a 2006 sierra 1500 slt crew cab auto 4x4

A few months ago transmission stated acting up and needed to be replaced. truck sat for a week during winter while i decided what to do with it. once i decided to replace with rebuilt unit truck battery was dead. boosted truck and drove it to work to pull the transmission.

truck was parked for a few more days during the swap.

once it was all back together truck would not start.

no crank no click nothing.

tested battery still good

rechecked all wiring everything looks good.

found that truck would start if key went went from off to crank quickly wit no pause at key on. required 2 cycles for truck to start

noticed shifter does not light up indicator for park or neutral but does for reverse and all forward gears, also truck no longer unlock doors when put into park.

took truck to transmission rebuilder as they had swapped out the range sensor on trans with one that was in better condition.

tried 2 other sensor with same result their scan tool show Park/Neutral with it in either park or neutral

checked all fuses underhood none blown

 

been driving truck daily for a month when it wouldnt start one morning. it stubbled on secound key cycle then would crank in short burst 1-2 sec but not start

during testing found the starter relay has power to control side and battery feed side. relay gets ground from pcm for 1-2 sec then it stops. temporarily grounded relay and truk cranked for 10-15 secounds and started. ive been driving for another month with the original issues.

i borrowed a really old scanner from the mac tools dealer and was able to confirm proper ingnition switch operation

i am a heavy truck tech so ive done what i can without a proper scan tool. 

im thinking either the pcm has bad ground circuit for the starter relay or after 2 sec of cranking the pcm sees something that makes it stop cranking. truck runs great once started.

am i right in my line of thinking?

Posted

10 to 15 seconds to start when relay jumped,to me,sounds like a compromised power/ground issue,how's the grounds at rear of engine?

Posted
10 to 15 seconds to start when relay jumped,to me,sounds like a compromised power/ground issue,how's the grounds at rear of engine?
The 10 to 15 secound crank with relay jumped was just one time. It was cold in the winter and truck failed to start on the 2nd short 1-2 secound crank cycle. I tried starting it another 6 or so times before jumping the relay so the cylinders probably had too much fuel from several fail cranking cycles.

Sent from my SM-G950W using Tapatalk

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

In case anyone else finds this post with similiar issues. I finally took the truck to a gm dealer. They confirmed the pcm was culprit for the no start. New or aftermarket pcm not available thru gm. I sourced a used one and installed. After performing the security relearn truck started correctly but had no communication with the throttle body module. Brought truck back to gm for programming.
Truck now starts correctly and PRND display correctly snd it will now unlock door in park.

Sent from my SM-G950W using Tapatalk

Posted
thanks for coming back and posting what your fix was.
No problem i hate when the post does with no conclusion

Sent from my SM-G950W using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • No doubt... But, as someone who doesn't pay for his services, but who has provided a few views/clicks on his Youtube platform, the data around the Mobil oil testing I think does have some value including to "freeloaders" like me.   A lot of what he's doing is likely showing the OE's work in their oil selection, something that many of us had kind of assumed was true all along, a good balance of both excellent protection and efficiency.
    • Lake Speed is drumming up business for his company just by being in the spot-light so he has a vested interest in stoking the 0W-20 fire.  IMO  
    • I knew when I bought my truck that it had off road hill decent or craw control or whatever they call it and rolled my eyes at that but it gets throw on with other options my truck has, I just never had a heads up if the highway speed regular cruise setting had anything to do with the brakes and that took me by surprise. If you've ever been to the top of Pikes Peak and watched those ahead of you on the way down with their brake lights on constantly, one can guess they are probably not gearing down or not enough anyway if their vehicle will allow and a good reason their is a brake check spot part way down where they use an infra red heat gun to check how hot ones brakes are front and rear.    Your right that once one gets out of the front range by Denver and I've not been on that stretch of 285 between Denver and Fairplay myself but I know its high and Fairplay at 10000 feet, Buena Vista at 8000, it drops a bit from there but then your going back up and over the 11000 pass and Durango is at 6500 . So yes your definitely right that 6500 and a lot higher is the theme of going anywhere out in that direction from Denver but hey, the down hill sections give fantastic fuel mileage !.    I don't even look at the fuel pumps for what premium costs here, since I live on a farm and up to this point get fuel delivered I am rarely in front of a fuel pump and when I am, I am often using card lock bulk fuel stations so it tells me what the price is AFTER I buy the fuel. Looking up on gas buddy and converting to US gallons but in Canadian dollars, regular on average of the prices listed was around 5.95 and premium is around 7.00 . That was one reason I did not go for the 6.2 half ton aside from its lack of carrying/towing if one was going by the rule of using premium fuel and until recently one could only buy regular farm gas if playing the few cents off game for farm dyed fuel for a "farm licensed pickup". But yes I hear you on the fuel price difference and like the diesel theme with it often being more expensive then gas it doesn't have quite the charm to it either as it once did although right now here for some reason the price of diesel has come down more so its now inline with the price of regular gas. 
    • I agree with this assessment. As you know I’m testing longevity with vehicles for the first time. I have a few vehicles I passed to kids and grandkids. We’re all past 100K miles some approaching 170K. I’m the only one doing 5k oil changes. The rest whatever the minder says. I’m the only one doing frequent transmission service. My odyssey the trip vehicle at 200K will be finished as a trip vehicle. I recently changed to high mileage oil, Valvoline. I can’t get past the fact that all manufacturers want to claim long service life. I just don’t make sense that they would go with low weight oil for mileage. While sacrificing longevity.
    • There's absolutely a mountain of profit in catering to the "I do my own research" crowd, people who are certain they know better. And I don't mean there isn't data to support that 0w40 produces less wear product than 0w20 in an engine like the 3.0 Duramax, that only feeds them the assurance they need. Again, my whole thing with oil selection is, sure, 0w40 or 0w30 produces less wear product. Are we talking the difference between the engine lasting only 100k versus 200k? Or are we talking more like, if the engine will already go 350k on a good 0w20 regimen recommended by the OE, is using 0w40 going to get us to 355k, assuming we can even get the rest of the truck to last that long, meanwhile sacrificing the first 5y, 100k in powertrain warranty. The answer isn't easy, there are tradeoffs.   I willfully use 0w20 Dexos D for this reason, knowing that a 0w40 will produce slightly less wear. I don't believe the delta in wear product is meaningful over the lifetime of the engine, and I place much more importance on driving style and overall feeding and care of the engine as a whole. It's the mentality that someone can abstain from alcohol their whole life which is an amazing boost to health by itself, theoretically. But if they're sedentary, that lifestyle choice will most likely kill them young despite their other, concerted efforts. Maybe someone doesn't drink AND they are the perfect picture of health and activity AND they use 0w40 AND they treat their engine perfectly. If living until 130 years is the goal, sure, do that. But it's going to be a really old truck falling apart around a good engine for that last 30 years, without a doubt.   I watched Demonworks' other video on the 100k+ 3.0 Duramax that had dealer 0w20 changes on what appears to be OLM-prescribed intervals (8-10k).   The QR codes are still present and readable on the main bearings. That's how little wear it has.   That's not proof that anyone else should stick to 0w20, but it's confirmation, for me, that 0w20 is perfectly acceptable to use in these engines.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...