Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I have a 2014 GMC Sierra 1500 and i had a check engine light pop up with the code P219A. The code popped up on the reader saying “Bank 1 Air-Fuel Ratio Imbalance” and maybe 30 seconds later the same code said   “Fuel Trim Cylinder Balance Bank 1”. I thought it was my 02 sensors but i did a live graph and all of them are working correctly. I cant figure it out. Anyone had this issue?

Edited by Armani Mattingly
  • 1 year later...
Posted

I have this problem too and like almost every other post I've seen, I can't find the root cause. It seems to only happen when the engine is cold. I even left the truck at the dealer for a whole week last winter and they weren't able to come up with anything. 

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
On 4/28/2021 at 6:04 AM, Bizon14 said:

I have this problem too and like almost every other post I've seen, I can't find the root cause. It seems to only happen when the engine is cold. I even left the truck at the dealer for a whole week last winter and they weren't able to come up with anything. 

It started with P219a once ever few weeks or so when it was cold out. P219a started coming on more frequently, even when it was above freezing. Then I started getting P050D "Cold Start Rough Idle", and I even had a few codes for misfires. I replaced the spark plugs and wires a few months ago and it didn't change anything. I decided to try changing the fuel injectors once it got to the point where I couldn't go more than a couple days without the check engine light coming on. 

 

I was shocked to see how dirty the old injectors were compared to a brand new one. It took about 5 hours to change the injectors with a little bit of help. So far, so good! I have also seen an increase in fuel economy. 

injectors.JPG

Posted (edited)

did you ever run e10 in the truck? what grade - 87 oct or higher.. thanks!!

Edited by PPK
Posted (edited)

Ok I found the right guys, talking about what is happening to my 2017 5.3l .

28568 miles and all injectors replaced. Embrassed to say how much I paid to have my P050D,P0300 codes from coming back. Truck is out of bumper to bumper of course. Yeah I gotta get tags for the thing so it's gotta pass emissions.

  These where hard codes and lite the CEL. But the weird thing that happened just before the check engine light came on was a hard downshift when slowing to a stop and at cruising speed the cruise control would not set.

  Well dealership called and said truck is ready to go. Drove it off with no problems. Parked it for 8 hours. Started it it up cold and same codes with CEL. Back to the dealership for 5 days. They say it's throwing codes all over the place. Had GM (supposedly) engineers involved to figure it out. Now they call me and say they put the truck back together and can't get it to throw any codes.

  I get the truck back on a Saturday and drive it around town putting miles on it so the emissions will completes so I can get the truck to pass emissions tests for state inspection. Mind you I stop and start the truck at least 10 times that day. No problems. No pending codes on my code reader.

  Start the truck cold on Sunday and get pending codes P0300, P050D on my code reader. No CEL, But the shift problem is back and cruise will not set. So I drive around a bit with this happening. Stop and restart the truck and it is fine. After a few starts the pending codes clear.

 What is going on here?

Finally put enough miles on the truck. About 130 miles without the CEL coming back on. Yet all along the way I'm seeing these pending codes coming up on my code reader.Got it to pass emissions test.

Still have the shift problem and no cruise until after the truck warms up and a restart.

Should I have to live with this?

 

 

 

Edited by Skeeterhawk
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

The dealership replaced all the fuel injectors again. Did not fix the problem. They now have replaced all the lifters. They are now test driving the truck for a few days to see if this will fix the problem.  I'm not confident that this is the fix. We shall see.

Posted
1 hour ago, Skeeterhawk said:

The dealership replaced all the fuel injectors again. Did not fix the problem. They now have replaced all the lifters. They are now test driving the truck for a few days to see if this will fix the problem.  I'm not confident that this is the fix. We shall see.

am i to understand the dealer replaced all 8 injectors twice and all the lifters ? 

test driving a few days?

IDK sounds like you need to find a better dealer

Posted
34 minutes ago, evad said:

am i to understand the dealer replaced all 8 injectors twice and all the lifters ? 

test driving a few days?

IDK sounds like you need to find a better dealer

Yep, actually I don't care at this point what they do to the truck. I paid for 5 injectors and GM ponyed up for what they said were 3 bad injectors. I will be filling a complaint with GM to get all my money back and file a complaint against the dealership thru the BBB. Then when I actually get the truck back it will be sold. Hopefully this will be the last thing I have to post on this site. Good riddens GM.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Diesel or gas?  The 37s will obviously, drastically reduce mpg, but the gasser will take a bigger hit to mpg, and power.  Rough guess, but I'd estimate a wmpg hit on the diesel, and up to 4on the gasser.    I wouldn't sweat a gear change on a duramax at all, and unlikely on the gasser either. You're obviously not concerned with acceleration or towing, and the 10spd will find itself in the right gear without much hunting, if any.    If towing, mpg and acceleration are a concern, you're doing the wrong mods.  Either leave it alone, or do the lift/tires and let the chips fall where they may. 
    • I understand. It is disturbing to think a manufacture asks so much and gives so little in engineering support. This is not a GM issues, this is a greed issue and one the ALL practice.    My intent was not to remove the wind from anyone's sail but rather to point out the areas deficient so that they can be discussed with improvements the goal. But to do that you have to know the truth and what that truth is.    The commercial interest are honed in on a few select issues in which they control all the variables and are not forthcoming in the least with their customers about the details. Failure is the only thing that drives these people to improvement. One way not to fail it to manage public "expectations". The set a bar they can clear and put their thumbs under the suspenders with chest puffed.... Only the internal data tells the story fully. As we don't have access to that for decades then we have to generate it ourselves. UOA's with data that matters.  
    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...