Jump to content

Tune needed? 6.0 with 5.3 heads.

05lq4
 Share

Recommended Posts

05lq4 Enthusiast

05lq4

Posted
Posted

Will i need a retune after swapping 5.3l heads onto a 6.0 l?

Sorry if this is a stupid question. Been searching forums for awhile now and cant find an answer. Everyone does a cam with this swap and i know a tune is needed after a cam. 

But is it necessary with just the head swap? 

Thanx in advance!

CamGTP Senior Enthusiast

CamGTP

Posted
Posted (edited)

I can't remember if the higher compression LQ9's ran premium from the factory or not. I wouldn't run regular 87 octane that's for sure. I've helped tune far to many of these truck with people running 87 octane, all they do is show spark re-tard with it under heavy load. 89+ octane is far better fuel.

Edited by CamGTP
swathdiver Senior Enthusiast

swathdiver

Posted
Posted
On 5/1/2020 at 12:47 PM, 05lq4 said:

Will i need a retune after swapping 5.3l heads onto a 6.0 l?

Sorry if this is a stupid question. Been searching forums for awhile now and cant find an answer. Everyone does a cam with this swap and i know a tune is needed after a cam. 

But is it necessary with just the head swap? 

Thanx in advance!

Why would you not want to?  A tune will optimize performance of the installed parts.  That setup should make for some nice low end torque!

  • Like 1
05lq4 Enthusiast

05lq4

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 5/2/2020 at 11:25 AM, swathdiver said:

Why would you not want to?  A tune will optimize performance of the installed parts.  That setup should make for some nice low end torque!

Yes i am torque hunting. Truck won't see above 5k rpm. Just a wood hauling Daily driver. 

Its eating a tiny amount of coolant so im doin head n intake gaskets anyhow. Found a cheap set of remanned 862s locally. And im 2 hours away from any place that can resurface my 317s. So in a way it seems easier haha. Hopefully it turns out that way!

 Just worried about driveability without a tune. And tunes seem to be more expensive than i thought they would be. 

If i was building a race car and spending thousands its a drop in the bucket. But im a budget guy for the time being. 

 

... So... would the smaller chamber make it run rich on the stock tune? 

  • Like 1
05lq4 Enthusiast

05lq4

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 5/2/2020 at 8:34 AM, CamGTP said:

I can't remember if the higher compression LQ9's ran premium from the factory or not. I wouldn't run regular 87 octane that's for sure. I've helped tune far to many of these truck with people running 87 octane, all they do is show spark re-tard with it under heavy load. 89+ octane is far better fuel.

I was wondering if i would have to run 89+ ! 5$ a fill up isnt gunna bother me too much. Its that big payment to the tuner that makes me cringe. 

Now that you bring up lq9s... I wonder how the 2 setups (lq4 with 5.3 heads and the lq9) would compare side by side???

swathdiver Senior Enthusiast

swathdiver

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, 05lq4 said:

Yes i am torque hunting. Truck won't see above 5k rpm. Just a wood hauling Daily driver. 

Its eating a tiny amount of coolant so im doin head n intake gaskets anyhow. Found a cheap set of remanned 862s locally. And im 2 hours away from any place that can resurface my 317s. So in a way it seems easier haha. Hopefully it turns out that way!

 Just worried about driveability without a tune. And tunes seem to be more expensive than i thought they would be. 

If i was building a race car and spending thousands its a drop in the bucket. But im a budget guy for the time being. 

 

... So... would the smaller chamber make it run rich on the stock tune? 

 

Don't think so, the computer system will adjust for it.  The LQ9 requires premium fuel, it's a 10:1 motor with flat top pistons.

 

https://help.summitracing.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/4808/related/1/session/L2F2LzEvdGltZS8xNTg4NjU3NjE2L2dlbi8xNTg4NjU3NjE2L3NpZC9mVWpCdDd5Zmp3TjBxYXNfajNYeXM1OVlacU5yd3dic2pkTjNMQjNHR2RHcE5YVElESzN6JTdFNVFzRXNfWHRfbkl6V3lTbWFkS0hGbURkclludSU3RUN1ZHNKUzJJR05vV2VOTW1aTjlUOEczZEF4N0doeU9Bc1J2Q3B3JTIxJTIx

05lq4 Enthusiast

05lq4

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Ahh the bearer of good news!! I was hoping the computer would adjust enough to not hurt anything. Not much info out there for stock 5.3 heads onto a stock lq4. 

Thanx for the link! Didnt realize the lq9 had better injectors. Thought the only difference was the fancy pistons and  intake cover haha. Oh and the price tag of course! $$$. 

 

7 hours ago, swathdiver said:

 

Don't think so, the computer system will adjust for it.  The LQ9 requires premium fuel, it's a 10:1 motor with flat top pistons.

 

https://help.summitracing.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/4808/related/1/session/L2F2LzEvdGltZS8xNTg4NjU3NjE2L2dlbi8xNTg4NjU3NjE2L3NpZC9mVWpCdDd5Zmp3TjBxYXNfajNYeXM1OVlacU5yd3dic2pkTjNMQjNHR2RHcE5YVElESzN6JTdFNVFzRXNfWHRfbkl6V3lTbWFkS0hGbURkclludSU3RUN1ZHNKUzJJR05vV2VOTW1aTjlUOEczZEF4N0doeU9Bc1J2Q3B3JTIxJTIx

 

 

  • Like 1
swathdiver Senior Enthusiast

swathdiver

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, 05lq4 said:

Not much info out there for stock 5.3 heads onto a stock lq4. 

Remember that the LS2 is a 6.0 block with 5.3(799/243) heads.  Now that I think about it, there are a few such builds over on the Performance Trucks forum.  Have a look around.

05lq4 Enthusiast

05lq4

Posted
  • Author
Posted
41 minutes ago, swathdiver said:

Remember that the LS2 is a 6.0 block with 5.3(799/243) heads.  Now that I think about it, there are a few such builds over on the Performance Trucks forum.  Have a look around.

Didnt realize 799 243 heads were 5.3. 

They have the slightly larger chambers and better cfm than the 862 706s right??

I guess i should always specify. I got LM7 heads. 

Just dove down the LS rabbit hole bout a month ago. All of this is fairly new ground for me. 

swathdiver Senior Enthusiast

swathdiver

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, 05lq4 said:

Didnt realize 799 243 heads were 5.3. 

They have the slightly larger chambers and better cfm than the 862 706s right??

I guess i should always specify. I got LM7 heads. 

Just dove down the LS rabbit hole bout a month ago. All of this is fairly new ground for me. 

Super Chevy thinks otherwise:

http://www.superchevy.com/how-to/engines-drivetrain/1712-surprising-hp-numbers-from-our-stock-ls-cylinder-head-test/

 

The 799/243 were originally associated with the 5.7 LS6 as that was the first engine to use them I think.  But now they are known for being on the 5.3 truck motors most and a favorite for rebuilders as the Gen III heads tend to crack and leak.  Look up Castech heads.

 

I'm fairly new to this too, bought my first LS in 2017, came from 1970s and 1980s Buicks.

Colossus Senior Enthusiast

Colossus

Posted
Posted

I would go ahead and contact Justin and Jenna at Blackbear.  Justin knows the 6.0 and 5.3 well and talk this over with him.  You'd be happy getting a tune from them anyway even if you don't need one. 

  • Like 1
  • 1 year later...
swathdiver Senior Enthusiast

swathdiver

Posted
Posted
On 5/1/2020 at 12:47 PM, 05lq4 said:

Will i need a retune after swapping 5.3l heads onto a 6.0 l?

Sorry if this is a stupid question. Been searching forums for awhile now and cant find an answer. Everyone does a cam with this swap and i know a tune is needed after a cam. 

But is it necessary with just the head swap? 

Thanx in advance!

What did you wind up doing?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Chuck FB
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I imagine the cold winters up here with repeated short runs in town every day for those that live and work in town and given what I have come to learn on this forum with DI engines having fuel dilution issues, and if they don't change the oil until it says to but keep driving it for a while, I bet all that is just lovely on those finicky lifters. 
    • teamjnz
      AWD conversion to Z71

      By teamjnz · Posted

      I just did some reading and Stabilitrak is more than a what I had originally thought. It is more of a vehicle control system to help the driver in precarious situations. I thought it was only the AWD system. Now I know. So I changed the title for this thread to AWD conversion to Z71 
    • teamjnz
      AWD conversion to Z71

      By teamjnz · Posted

      Sounds like converting will be a bigger endeavor than I was thinking. This truck doesn't have 2Hi like the Suburban did. The Tahoe has 4Hi and 4Lo and a button to turn of traction control.   From what I understand the Stabilitrak uses open diff in the front and rear. When wheel speed is not the same the stabilitrak uses the ABS system to slowdown the spinning wheel(s) to transfer power to the slower non-spinning wheel(s). I thought the transfer case was open too. Being able to transfer power either more to front or rear depending on wheel spin. Maybe I miss understood some information with you saying and power transfer is 50-50. Thanks
    • PunchT37
      OCI, not when but why?

      By PunchT37 · Posted

      My brother has a 2007 Avalanche with afm 5.3. It`s got 176,000 miles. Runs like a clock. Never been apart. Co worker has a 2010 Tahoe with afm 5.3. 230,000 miles. Never been apart. Runs like a clock. So, even though cyl deac is a weak spot, they can go the distance.   BUT, these engines had the oil changed regularly, AND had 5w30 as spec. I wonder if they would have lasted this far on 0w20? I`ll bet not.
    • Chuck FB
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I certainly could be wrong but I hear of pickups far newer than that 2007 cutoff which may not be going to the wrecker but are having engine work done and be that a reman engine or new engine or trying to repair the existing engine. Some of it would be design issues as per the cylinder deactivation system that GM has and one of those lifters wiping out the cam and the question of oil changes moving the needle or not on that whole mess, or in the case of Ford pickup engines that have the long timing chains and wearing them out and the roller followers and phasers and some of that certainly goes back to oil change intervals. But in those various cases the truck has all sorts of life left in it and so the unfortunate owner and may be original owner or used market owner that is pouring money into repairs so the truck is not seeing the salvage yard yet but damage is happening by infrequent oil changes. A friends son had bought a 2018 I think it is half ton GM and it had some sort of extended or used dealer warranty on it and of course the lifter issue bites and its rattling and so the dealer had to swallow the bill and was at least 7000.00 and I think they only replaced what they felt they had to replace so yeah, I can see that being a ticking time bomb in the not too distant future. Would frequent oil changes cure all these engineering "marvels", probably not but some engine designs have shown that they do much better if the oil is changed a lot more often then if the manufacturer service claims are followed. New trucks cost so much that there is an incentive to keep the existing truck on the road by repairing. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...