Jump to content

OBD1 limited tuning ability

M Wyson
 Share

Recommended Posts

M Wyson New Member

M Wyson

Posted
Posted

Is there an aftermarket computer I can put in my truck to give me more tuning ability? My 1990 OBD1 ECM is limited as to what I can do with it. It's an antique. Is there a later model ECM I can swap into this truck? I don't really want to go backwards and install an HEI and carburator but it's what I'm tempted to do. I've had this truck for 750,000 miles. I've been lucky so far to not be broke down and it's virtually been trouble free. The check engine light comes on and I start replacing parts then it goes off for another 30,000 miles or so. I just hate the fact I can't plug a laptop into it and see what's going on. (Yeah I know about Moates.com but that's a lot of hassle to still have limited tunability) 

riverbanks Senior Enthusiast

riverbanks

Posted
Posted

Where do you think you can improve it?true dual exhaust,e-fan, higher gear ratio are a few things you can do

CamGTP Senior Enthusiast

CamGTP

Posted
Posted

Nope, nothing you plug in will do what you want.

 

I would go with a Holley Sniper system or similar. They are a fuel injection carb looking thing with sensors and a mini handheld computer that I believe you can also plug a laptop into.

M Wyson New Member

M Wyson

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Doesn't the ECM control other things like the a/c and shift points and convertor lockup?

CamGTP Senior Enthusiast

CamGTP

Posted
Posted

Yeah.

 

I was just giving you an option. Standalone control systems is the only real way to get the adjustability you want. It would mean other things would have to be either gone away with or made function another way. Like a standalone transmission controller or making it manual valve body and figuring out the AC system.

 

It's either live with what you got or dive off the deep end with mods. Or just slap a 5.3/6.0 and have gobs more power/torque and fuel mileage compared to a TBI truck.

  • Like 1
LDM Enthusiast

LDM

Posted
Posted (edited)

I've been doing OBD1 tuning since the late 90s.  Still do it today on my 89 and 94 Camaros.  You can get an OBD1 interface and the DataCat program from www.tunercat.com and be able to plug in and read all the codes you want.  DataCat is TunerCat's updated version of the old TTS Powersystems data logging programs and supports just about every one of the OBD1 truck ECMs from 88 to 95.  You can also buy the definition file and TunerCat tuning program to tune your truck as well, although you are also going to need some additional equipment such as EPROM burner, adapters, and EEPROM chips or an Ostrich to allow real time tuning.  Gets a little pricey if you want to do real tuning but no where near what it costs for OBD2 tuning.

 

There really is no sense in spending money on an expensive aftermarket ECM when the current one still works just fine.  However, unless you have done ECM/PCM tuning before, its not going to be something plug and play.  You are going to have to spend time and effort to learn what you are doing or risk damaging your engine and/or ECM.

Edited by LDM
  • Like 1
M Wyson New Member

M Wyson

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks. Yeah I've looked into it and seems to be a lot of stuff to get and a lot of stuff to learn. I think I'll just find someone to burn an Eprom for me. I just bought a zz4 Vortec engine so I need to eliminate the egr

LDM Enthusiast

LDM

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, M Wyson said:

Thanks. Yeah I've looked into it and seems to be a lot of stuff to get and a lot of stuff to learn. I think I'll just find someone to burn an Eprom for me. I just bought a zz4 Vortec engine so I need to eliminate the egr

If you are going with a ZZ4 I would probably just recommend the carb route.  You would need significant tuning to get a 90 ECM to work with a ZZ4 engine, they have much better heads and a far different cam/lift profile than the old stock TBI engine.  If you really do want to go EFI that has self tuning ability, the Holly Sniper EFI is suppose to be able to self tune without a laptop.  Not sure how well it works and its about $1400 so it is definitely a lot more costly than a carb.

  • 5 years later...
amethyst6 New Member

amethyst6

Posted
Posted
On 8/12/2020 at 12:07 PM, LDM said:

I've been doing OBD1 tuning since the late 90s.  Still do it today on my 89 and 94 Camaros.  You can get an OBD1 interface and the DataCat program from www.tunercat.com and be able to plug in and read all the codes you want.  DataCat is TunerCat's updated version of the old TTS Powersystems data logging programs and supports just about every one of the OBD1 truck ECMs from 88 to 95.  You can also buy the definition file and TunerCat tuning program to tune your truck as well, although you are also going to need some additional equipment such as EPROM burner, adapters, and EEPROM chips or an Ostrich to allow real time tuning.  Gets a little pricey if you want to do real tuning but no where near what it costs for OBD2 tuning.

 

There really is no sense in spending money on an expensive aftermarket ECM when the current one still works just fine.  However, unless you have done ECM/PCM tuning before, its not going to be something plug and play.  You are going to have to spend time and effort to learn what you are doing or risk damaging your engine and/or ECM.

Do you still tune obd1? 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined

  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,202 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • B14Sierra
      Cam chain tensioner question

      By B14Sierra · Posted

      So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • dna9656
      No low range 4 x 4

      By dna9656 · Posted

      My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • asilverblazer
      Transmission Woes :-(

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • asilverblazer
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • Chuck FB
      summer road trips in the 2026 2500HD

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...