Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I got my 2019 HC in October of 2018 and my rear window started leaking last Friday (8/7/2020). I called the dealer as soon as I saw the water and I told them I had 36,8xx miles. I dropped it off Monday (8/10/2020) with 36,9xx miles and the dealer said that warranty will not cover the cost since I'm over my 36,000 mile bumper to bumper coverage. A service bulletin came out in February 2019 but since mine never leaked I didn't want them touching it. Am I wrong for saying that warranty should cover it since it is a known problem?

 

Update: I called and the seal was cracked and the rear window is separating. They are replacing the rear window and seals. 

Edited by drucker
update
Posted
1 minute ago, cmysstailights said:

Contact corporate

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
 

Phone number?

Posted

If it is a known defect, tsb or recall I would think it should be covered regardless of the warranty, but not 100% sure.

 

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

Posted

I think these guys use every excuse in the book to not do stuff for free. My bet is you’re on the hook for the bill. Keep us posted.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Posted

This will be the exact reason why I will have to end up dumping my truck or replacing the rear with a solid glass window at 3yr/36k miles.

They have already made three attempts to resolve this issue on mine in less than 9 mos.

GM has no plan to fix this defect properly and has not given any confidence to their customers nor provided transparency on their efforts.

New trucks are coming off the assembly line with this same part today and GM knows it has a problem. 
 

Posted

The dealership has a body shop doing the repair and they are waiting on the new window. The dealership said gm has a new part number window that just came out. The window should be in and installed today and I will pick  it up Monday afternoon. Here is a picture of the truck. They didn't take the rear window spoiler off. The dealership also said they were going to ask GM to cover it under warranty. I have already called GM customer service and I have a case number for this.

20200813_164435.jpg

Posted
35 minutes ago, drucker said:

....The dealership said gm has a new part number window that just came out.....

 


when you get that new window installed, please post a picture of this info from it like this. 

image.png.841b91e047f1cd24dec89d3163981682.png

Posted

I sure will. 

7 minutes ago, UGADawgs said:


when you get that new window installed, please post a picture of this info from it like this. 

image.png.841b91e047f1cd24dec89d3163981682.png

 

Posted

I got my truck back today and it costed me $384 after I talked to customer care and the dealer. The dealer said they came to agreement with GM that I had to pay 40% of the total bill.  I didn't see the actual total to calculate the 40% so who knows. Here is the new window part number that they waited on. The window was built 7/29/20. The dealer said this was a new part number but I don't know. Maybe sooner one on here can tell me. 

20200818_172418.jpg

20200818_172527.jpg

Posted
12 hours ago, drucker said:

I got my truck back today and it costed me $384 after I talked to customer care and the dealer. The dealer said they came to agreement with GM that I had to pay 40% of the total bill.  I didn't see the actual total to calculate the 40% so who knows. Here is the new window part number that they waited on. The window was built 7/29/20. The dealer said this was a new part number but I don't know. Maybe sooner one on here can tell me. 

20200818_172418.jpg

20200818_172527.jpg

Sorry to tell you this, but that window is the exact same one they installed in mine in February as you can see our pictures match. Yeah, it was a "new part" over six months ago when it replaced the E2. However, my E4 leaked just over a week ago, there are others on this forum with leaking E4s, and you can see the updates I've posted in the main thread on this recently. You should check that they added the sealant on top of your new window as my dealer said that is now the current process even for replaced windows.

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,995 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...