Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have never done UOA's. Going to do one on our new car.

I seem to remember reading on here that Polaris, Horizon has better testing for one aspect of UOA's than Blackstone. 

I'm concerned about oil dilution but want the most accurate tests of course. 

Which one?

Posted (edited)

I like Dyson. You get a percentage of fuel instead of a pass/fail flash cup test. 

 

Terry sends you a printed file AND and audio file and will field questions till the cows come home.

 

BlackSilverado (Nick) pointed me in that direction. 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
Posted (edited)

No. The URL I thought belonged to his site says the domain is not connected. Maybe a temporary glitch? Black02silverado should have something for you. I've sent him a PM

 

It was dysonanalysis.com as I remember

Edited by txab
Posted

Thanks txab

That site was wrong to me. 

Posted

Ft Davis, Texas 79734-0403                          

www.dysonanalysis.com

903 413 2071 

www.facebook.com/dysonanalysis

twitter.com/DysonAnalysis

 

© 1980-2018 DysonAnalysis.com | Liability limited to the cost of test service  
All comments & analysis are proprietary in nature & are the intellectual 
property of DysonAnalysis     

 

This help?

Posted

Doesn't work Grumpy.

I have looked a lot. No where t be found.

Posted (edited)

All of his contact sites have been shut down apparently.

 

Let's see what Nick has to say

Edited by txab
  • Like 1
Posted

Hey guys, sorry to get back on here late.  Been busy fixing things around the house.  I installed a pocket door. I must say, it wasn't hard but I'm no drywall guy.:crackup:

 

Terry is retired Navy and also just retired from his Analysis business but told me that he is doing some still, just not on the scale with corporations and such.  You can reach him at  [email protected]

 

Like stated above by Grumpy Bear, Terry sends a PDF and an audio file to explain the UOA report.  Also his test for fuel dilution is current and more precise. It is my understanding Blackstone Labs uses an older method and it isn't very accurate.  The process to detect fuel is expensive for the current system and one can't blame any lab for not wanting to update their equipment.  Fuel dilution is important now with direct injection.  It can cause major issues.  Case in point.  My FD in our 2016 Suburban was 3.7 and that is way to high.  Needless to say it caused issues and this is why I do UOA's.  So I can adjust my drain intervals accordingly.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

So is Blackstone good enough? Sounds like it to me. 

Posted
56 minutes ago, diyer2 said:

So is Blackstone good enough? Sounds like it to me. 

They are for the most part.  Most don't go extended like me.  Oil Analyzers/Polaris Labs uses an updated method FTIR, so it would give a better view on how your oil is doing.  There are oil UOA's online where someone sent a sample to each lab and Blackstone's flash test showed fuel dilution as 0 but OAI showed it high.   

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks Black02Silverado.

I checked out Polaris Labs. Their site isn't as easy to use. Blackstone makes it easy to get the sample kits.

My original post brought up the difference between the 2. 

 

just not the details.

Posted
8 hours ago, diyer2 said:

Thanks Black02Silverado.

I checked out Polaris Labs. Their site isn't as easy to use. Blackstone makes it easy to get the sample kits.

My original post brought up the difference between the 2. 

 

just not the details.

You're welcome.  :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,778
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    daveishi
    Newest Member
    daveishi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 803 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...