Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
13 hours ago, flyingfool said:

i found it interesting and have no idea why, but by shifting to neutral  on a 1500 truck , I actually gained more "rear brake bias" durring a stop. I wish i knew more about the brake proportioning system on these truck, 'cause the nose dive brake effect is not ideal. i wish it could be modified somehow

When you hit the brakes the torque converter clutch unlocks and the truck is now pushing the motor adding braking to the back wheels (2wd) or all four (4wd). The speed logic in the TCM will downshift to the gear for the speed on it's own as if you were coasting to a stop. At some point below about 10 mph your so far below the converters minimum coupling speed it no longer matters. 

 

Some states, like the one I live in, there is actually a law against being out of gear while in traffic. Just say' n. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

that's what i would think, but coasting to stop, usually the idle speed is about 800-1000 rpm so it still has a push your braking against. i just cant figure why the brake bias changes when in neutral

Edited by flyingfool
Posted
18 minutes ago, flyingfool said:

that's what i would think, but coasting to stop, usually the idle speed is about 800-1000 rpm so it still has a push your braking against. i just cant figure why the brake bias changes when in neutral

That is strange. Mine idles at 535 rpm. My converter stalls at 1635 and starts to couple around 750-800 rpm. 

Posted
13 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

YIKES, I'm only 30K from issues? 

?

That's less than a year away!

As clean as you keep your fluid Marty, I doubt it.  Mine is almost there too.

1 hour ago, flyingfool said:

i would like to find out more info on this, is there a gm tech bulitin  or tech documentation?

 

not even considering panic stop but just regular daily stop and go action,  neutral shifting makes the truck feel effortless entering the stop and more relaxing, then when in  Drive and having the engine pushing the driveline

Never seen anything about it or how it works save for that explanation given to me once.  Just stumbled across it while exploring the Tech-2.

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, swathdiver said:

As clean as you keep your fluid Marty, I doubt it.  Mine is almost there too.

Never seen anything about it or how it works save for that explanation given to me once.  Just stumbled across it while exploring the Tech-2.

Sup bud, read most of you comments seem like you have great knowledge with these trucks. 
I have a 17 1500, with a 4.3 sadly. My gear ratio is 3.23. With a 6speed transmission.  I’m planning on lifting it to 9” and slapping on some 37s. What gear ratio do you recommend to keep similar rpms to stock. Yes I know 37s with a v6 is stupid but I just love that look. 

Posted
19 minutes ago, Alexmorales0850 said:

Sup bud, read most of you comments seem like you have great knowledge with these trucks. 
I have a 17 1500, with a 4.3 sadly. My gear ratio is 3.23. With a 6speed transmission.  I’m planning on lifting it to 9” and slapping on some 37s. What gear ratio do you recommend to keep similar rpms to stock. Yes I know 37s with a v6 is stupid but I just love that look. 

4.10 and 37's = 31 (stock) and 3.23. 

4.30 would be close to a 3.42

4.56 about the same as 3.73

4.88 close to 4.10

If you run in M5 on your current 31's that will give you a feel for rpm in top gear with the 4.10 on 31 or 4.88 on 37.

Posted
17 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

4.10 and 37's = 31 (stock) and 3.23. 

4.30 would be close to a 3.42

4.56 about the same as 3.73

4.88 close to 4.10

If you run in M5 on your current 31's that will give you a feel for rpm in top gear with the 4.10 on 31 or 4.88 on 37.

Would this also be same for my truck? 2014 Silverado 5.3 2wd with 3.42 right now already lifted on 37s though but looking to regear soon but I drive on the highway a lot so would 4.10 be the best?

Posted
1 minute ago, Frankielozano214 said:

Would this also be same for my truck? 2014 Silverado 5.3 2wd with 3.42 right now already lifted on 37s though but looking to regear soon but I drive on the highway a lot so would 4.10 be the best?

If you wish to keep the 3.42 to stock relationship; then 4.30. There is a small fly in the ointment however. Roll out distance is NOT Pi of the diameter and this reference treats it as if it were. That is a 31" tire will have a rollout of something less but how much? Some places like Tire Rack will have that information for a specific tire. 

 

That said even if off by an inch or so the rpm will be pretty darn close for the ratios I've given. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Use a rpm/gear ratio calculator to see where your RPM's will end up.

 

I think with 4.10's on those size tires you'd be around 1750-1800rpm at 70mph.

 

Right now it's probably around 1500 at 70mph if I had to guess.

 

 

Posted
54 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

4.10 and 37's = 31 (stock) and 3.23. 

4.30 would be close to a 3.42

4.56 about the same as 3.73

4.88 close to 4.10

If you run in M5 on your current 31's that will give you a feel for rpm in top gear with the 4.10 on 31 or 4.88 on 37.

Great info brother. Something I forgot to ask. How will the truck perform with overdrive on those gears. 

Posted
25 minutes ago, CamGTP said:

Use a rpm/gear ratio calculator to see where your RPM's will end up.

 

I think with 4.10's on those size tires you'd be around 1750-1800rpm at 70mph.

 

Right now it's probably around 1500 at 70mph if I had to guess.

 

 

I’d have to drive it to be sure. But it sounds about right. Just worried about how re gearing will affect overdrive 

Posted
37 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

If you wish to keep the 3.42 to stock relationship; then 4.30. There is a small fly in the ointment however. Roll out distance is NOT Pi of the diameter and this reference treats it as if it were. That is a 31" tire will have a rollout of something less but how much? Some places like Tire Rack will have that information for a specific tire. 

 

That said even if off by an inch or so the rpm will be pretty darn close for the ratios I've given. 

Ok kinda get it I’ll definitely have to read more on this to make sure I get the right gears for my truck

Posted

A tune is required when changing gears and tire size. So whoever does the tune should be able to get it shifting good.

 

I think the computer/ABS may freak out if you actually put 37's into the tune though, I forget if they can put 35's in the calibration have it be fine and just deal with a slightly off speedo.

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, CamGTP said:

A tune is required when changing gears and tire size. So whoever does the tune should be able to get it shifting good.

 

I think the computer/ABS may freak out if you actually put 37's into the tune though, I forget if they can put 35's in the calibration have it be fine and just deal with a slightly off speedo.

Got my truck tuned already, and tires size calibrated already but needa regear and get another tune after I install my exhaust since I’ve done a cold air intake.

Edited by Frankielozano214

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,778
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    daveishi
    Newest Member
    daveishi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,034 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...