Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

as I told you on duramax forum, avoid the LMLs.  2011-2016 models. 

  • Like 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, cmysstailights said:

Trading in my gasser. Maxed out the trucks towing

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
 

 

 

Yeah, saw that trailer you posted somewhere, it's a biggen, you probably need the diesel to tow that with any good result. Is your current truck paid off, think of trade in?

Posted
 
 
Yeah, saw that trailer you posted somewhere, it's a biggen, you probably need the diesel to tow that with any good result. Is your current truck paid off, think of trade in?
I owe 25k left 3yrs worth of payments. Wouldnt mind extending 1 yr more on payments. Also tossing around a re gear. Getting prices on tht

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

My payments are super low, so I'll keep this one as is for now. But in the future, I see me doing the exact same thing as you are now, getting a trailer just a bit to big for the gas, traded a paid off truck in for this one, probably do the same again on a diesel.

  • Like 1
Posted
My payments are super low, so I'll keep this one as is for now. But in the future, I see me doing the exact same thing as you are now, getting a trailer just a bit to big for the gas, traded a paid off truck in for this one, probably do the same again on a diesel.
My intentions were to keep her. But the hills have me concerned. If the gear swap wasnt so much i would try that first. But 3600 is a big nut to swallow.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

I like your big ass trailer, I'm sure I'll be looking at some kind of toy hauler, just makes more sense for me. No people to haul, just the 4 wheeler and motorcycle.

Posted

I started out with a 10k lb bumper pull. Fam of 5.... 3 women needed a half bath. So upgraded to 5th wheel. Sucks, now have to upgrade truck again lol.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

That doesn't seem ridiculous for a Denali Diesel with less than 100k. You may be able to find a better deal though.

 

Searching Autotrader - you don't have a lot to pick from. After all, everyone touts how diesels hold their value - you're probably going to have to really dig for the good deal.

 

That one looked pretty clean, so might be worth it.

Posted
That doesn't seem ridiculous for a Denali Diesel with less than 100k. You may be able to find a better deal though.
 
Searching Autotrader - you don't have a lot to pick from. After all, everyone touts how diesels hold their value - you're probably going to have to really dig for the good deal.
 
That one looked pretty clean, so might be worth it.
Working on a 17 hc with 86k miles for 50k. Trying for 48k 49k

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)
23 hours ago, cmysstailights said:

Working on a 17 hc with 86k miles for 50k. Trying for 48k 49k

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
 

FWIW - I went from a Silverado LT to a Denali by chance. I'd be lying if I didn't say I absolutely LOVE the Denali. It's sooo comfortable and I couldn't believe how different the truck was for being "same" as the Chevy. Some of the features of the digital display are also nice when towing - shows trans temp and brake gain, etc.

Edited by ewbldavis

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • same here , i have a 2020 first gen and the cost to repair these engines far excedes replacement
    • But Grumpy I did show several subdivisions that had homes starting in the 170K range. If you bought a Townhouse or Condo you could go cheaper. Same with a car 3000 dollars in the 70s translates to around 20K today. There are several models at that price. You actually get more for the money. In the 70s I drove a 3000$ car bought a 28K home and made 4.50 per hour. Thank goodness for overtime. Today I could buy a 170K house drive a 20K car and make 25 dollars an hour operating the same machine today. The difference the house, car, machine would be better and have AC. And I wouldn’t be taxed on overtime. And statistically your wife works too. Easing the burden. I thought we agreed to disagree. I brought receipts earlier, showing examples. I think you’re more stubborn than me. I was done with this debate. 
    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...