Jump to content

Tire Size Recommendation 2018 LTZ Silverado

TowelieH20

By TowelieH20
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

TowelieH20 Enthusiast

TowelieH20

Posted
Posted

Hey Guys,

 

I was wondering what size tire (Nitto Terra Grappler G2) would be best to replace the stock  285/45R22  tires on my 2018 LTZ Silverado? I want a more aggressive look, nothing too crazy and I don't want it to rub. I plan on leveling the from 2". Which of these sizes do you guys recommend and would look the best?  LT285/50R22 , LT285/55R22 ,  305/45R22, or the  33x12.50R22LT. Thank you.

CamGTP Senior Enthusiast

CamGTP

Posted
Posted

He can't go down to a 265's with factory 22's.

 

Lots of people do 305's. Look up a tire size calculator to give you the best idea of how much larger of a tire you are going with.

dieselfan1 Senior Enthusiast

dieselfan1

Posted
Posted

305's
They won't rub with a 2" level kit and they look good with 22's

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

Salsa De Piña Enthusiast

Salsa De Piña

Posted
Posted
On 11/27/2020 at 4:43 PM, CamGTP said:

He can't go down to a 265's with factory 22's.

Yes, he could.  Pirelli even makes winter tires in a 265/40R22.  Probably for Land Rovers.

CamGTP Senior Enthusiast

CamGTP

Posted
Posted

They may make 265's but no matter what the width of the tire is going to be 1in shorter compared to a 285. A 265 is going to have a stretch fit.

 

Also no major brand makes a 265/50/22 that would equal his stock size. I found some Mickey Thompsons and some off brand tires but nothing from anyone major.

Salsa De Piña Enthusiast

Salsa De Piña

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, CamGTP said:

A 265 is going to have a stretch fit.

Factory Chevy 22's are 9" wide.  The vast majority of 265 width tires for 22" rims are designed for 9 - 10.5" wide rims, so no, they're not stretch fit.  It turns out Land Rovers have wide rims.  Who'd'a thought?  

 

At the end of the day, if OP is set on the Nittos (which aren't available in 265 width,) 285 would be the best option for snow and gravel roads.  But hey, if traction isn't important, by all means go wider.

Salsa De Piña Enthusiast

Salsa De Piña

Posted
Posted

There's a reason rally car snow/gravel tires are an inch narrower than tarmac tires.  On loose surfaces, you want a longer contact patch, not a wider one.

 

Would it be noticeable?  That's up to you.  Will one offer better performance objectively?  Yes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Atlas
      Gas Prices

      By Atlas · Posted

      Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • scotthvac.net
      2022-24 halogen - led grille swap

      By scotthvac.net · Posted

      2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • davester
      Replacement Radiator

      By davester · Posted

      And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • davester
      Turning radius

      By davester · Posted

      Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...