Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

sky net is already up and running under Elon's SPaceX , they launched over a 1000 mini sats last year. I rememeber watching them being launched out over the west coast. It was facinating seeing a string of sats in a "train line" across the night sky. it must have be over 2000 miles long .

 

Anyways he's selling it as free or lowcost interenet service for impoverished countries.  but they are capable of 24/7 image recording which he can be sold to local state , cities Countries for policing and basic survailance of the people.

Posted
29 minutes ago, diyer2 said:

There are so many things a robot can't do and it will be years before they can. 

like what???

Posted
no reason for human troops to be fresh anymore, you seem to think your needed,. the only human left on the battle field will be mechanics and he's on shaky ground too
Its not about being needed. It's about wanting to do it and being there.

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Posted
like what???

If you dont know then you believe the end of the human species is near because robots can do everything and better.

 

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

  • Confused 1
Posted

You know what happens when there’s not enough work to sustain a population? It shrinks. The environmental people would be extremely happy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
3 hours ago, flyingfool said:

no reason for human troops to be fresh anymore, you seem to think your needed,. the only human left on the battle field will be mechanics and he's on shaky ground too

A troop being "fresh" is a Cold War concept which is more effective today with all the technology.  This is not an even or, technology will keep a troop fresh whether military command structure knows it or not.  Troop numbers have downsized a bit because of technology, but won't be replaced because of technology.  Hollywood is the only place technology doesn't need a troop on the battlefield.  In the real world, human intelligence can't be replaced.  Although, it would be nice to have an android like "Data" (Star Trek Next Gen) working next to me.

Posted
3 hours ago, flyingfool said:

sky net is already up and running under Elon's SPaceX , they launched over a 1000 mini sats last year. I rememeber watching them being launched out over the west coast.

In the last 30 yrs, launches from the Western Range have never been more than 36 per year, 20 of which had nothing to do with satellites.  Your information source is grossly inaccurate.  During my glory days, I was a member of a rocket launch Disaster Control Group.  

Posted
1 hour ago, The Zip said:

In the last 30 yrs, launches from the Western Range have never been more than 36 per year, 20 of which had nothing to do with satellites.  Your information source is grossly inaccurate.  During my glory days, I was a member of a rocket launch Disaster Control Group.  

This might be what he was referring to:

https://www.kmov.com/news/see-a-string-of-lights-in-the-sky-it-was-probably-spacex-s-starlink-satellites/article_ca175fb8-88ff-11ea-acb9-63a781c28857.html

 

The 60 Starlink broadband satellites rode atop one of SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rockets, taking off from Florida’s Kennedy Space Center at 3:30 pm ET. The devices are now coasting through orbit, where they will soon begin climbing to about 340 miles above ground, their operational altitude. This launch brings the total number of Starlink satellites in orbit to more than 400.

 

SpaceX has said the satellites will allow it to beam Internet directly to terminals that consumers will set up at their homes or offices. Service is expected to roll out in the United States and Canada this year, CEO Elon Musk has said. The company plans to eventually grow its constellation to more than 40,000 satellites, blanketing the entire planet in cheap, high-speed Internet connectivity.

Posted
1 hour ago, The Zip said:

In the last 30 yrs, launches from the Western Range have never been more than 36 per year, 20 of which had nothing to do with satellites.  Your information source is grossly inaccurate.  During my glory days, I was a member of a rocket launch Disaster Control Group.  

what's inaccurate ?

Posted
26 minutes ago, aseibel said:

This might be what he was referring to:

https://www.kmov.com/news/see-a-string-of-lights-in-the-sky-it-was-probably-spacex-s-starlink-satellites/article_ca175fb8-88ff-11ea-acb9-63a781c28857.html

 

The 60 Starlink broadband satellites rode atop one of SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rockets, taking off from Florida’s Kennedy Space Center at 3:30 pm ET. The devices are now coasting through orbit, where they will soon begin climbing to about 340 miles above ground, their operational altitude. This launch brings the total number of Starlink satellites in orbit to more than 400.

 

SpaceX has said the satellites will allow it to beam Internet directly to terminals that consumers will set up at their homes or offices. Service is expected to roll out in the United States and Canada this year, CEO Elon Musk has said. The company plans to eventually grow its constellation to more than 40,000 satellites, blanketing the entire planet in cheap, high-speed Internet connectivity.

Kennedy Space Center (KSC) is the Eastern Range launching into a different orbit than the Western Range.  He said he remember watching these launches from the West Coast.  There is no way he could see these KSC launches from LA?

Posted
15 minutes ago, The Zip said:

Kennedy Space Center (KSC) is the Eastern Range launching into a different orbit than the Western Range.  He said he remember watching these launches from the West Coast.  There is no way he could see these KSC launches from LA?

I'm no rocket scientist, I don't even know which way they go once they are airborne, but I do know people in Wisconsin who could see the string of lights from a recent launch. We're pretty far from America's wang up here. Just saying they could be seen from a ways off- not the launch itself, but when they went overhead.

 

Here's the story from a local news station. https://waow.com/2020/04/27/spot-a-line-of-lights-in-the-night-sky-its-most-likely-spacex-starlink-satellites/

 

Posted
28 minutes ago, flyingfool said:

what's inaccurate ?

As a member of a Launch Disaster Control Group (LDCG), you are on the ground in close proximity to a rocket launch.  I have been a member of the LDCG for over 300 rocket and missile launches.  In the best year of the Western Range, there was no more than 3 launches per month.  You watching 1000 launches from the Western range is inaccurate.  That's an average of 83 per month, not possible.

  • Like 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, The Zip said:

As a member of a Launch Disaster Control Group (LDCG), you are on the ground in close proximity to a rocket launch.  I have been a member of the LDCG for over 300 rocket and missile launches.  In the best year of the Western Range, there was no more than 3 launches per month.  You watching 1000 launches from the Western range is inaccurate.  That's an average of 83 per month, not possible.

Did you read the article I shared? It said 60 mini satellites were launched on 1 Falcon 9 rocket. So not 1000 launches, but 1000 satellites in total. 

Posted
1 hour ago, aseibel said:

Did you read the article I shared? It said 60 mini satellites were launched on 1 Falcon 9 rocket. So not 1000 launches, but 1000 satellites in total. 

I read what you wrote, but don't click on untrusted links.  Subject got off track for a minute, I have no more comments about rocket launches.

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, The Zip said:

Kennedy Space Center (KSC) is the Eastern Range launching into a different orbit than the Western Range.  He said he remember watching these launches from the West Coast.  There is no way he could see these KSC launches from LA?

i'm telling you what i saw,  on the west coast Los Angeles San Pedro area. I stood there for "20 minutes"  1 hour after sunset. watching a conga line of sats cruising by West to East..at least 1000 units.  no way will 60 mini sats traverse the sky for this long of a duration. while flying by at a steady speed of a normal satalite in orbit, they where all perfectly spaced probably 50 mile separation.  some one has an interesting project up there if its not  SpaceX stuff.

on a side note, i had a super bright led focusing flashlight and set it to pulse mode. and managed to train it on a few of them. interesting enough one sat pulled off the conga line stopped and gave a relfective flash back at me, then continued back in the group

Edited by flyingfool

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Yes, and only a couple years before delivery. 🙄
    • So you're saying toss the baby out with the bathwater? @txab posted article was her take on how AI can be used to manipulate pricing as it already does and has been rebuked by the judiciasry in housing. How AI can be and is used to maximize refinery or even Amazon operations all of which are true but because she is who she is; that makes what she says about what is true, false? Is that something akin to Pre-justice aka prejudice?    Look, I'm first in line to approach all information with caution just because we live in a world where people like to lie about someone or something with such a straight face and in such volume that it makes digging to the truth wearisome. Meaning I understand the skepticisms but if I were to toss out everything a person is for a view they hold then my pool of people to draw wisdom from would be non-existent and I'd be forced to reinvent the wheel daily. Not practical.    "Be innocent as a dove but as cautious as a serpent."    Test each word. Every good lie is part truth or no one would believe it. Find the truth in it and reject what isn't.    On this one, AI is being used to do what has been done by hand for hundreds of years already but at such speed, the point of a computer, that it is more easily monetized. This one wasn't that hard a lift.    I wrote a few formulas in a Lotus 123 program decades ago, a series of linked Macros actually, that allowed a daily inventory to be turned into a running P&L and production plan. Something that took three departments a week to assemble now took the time it takes to input the 'daily changes' in inventory. Later that was ungraded to the more powerful Excel program an and integrated with bar code scanning, inventory to supply was done once per shift. It had a huge impact on production scheduling, Seamless interruption flexibility, inventory error reduction, raw materials cost effective utilization and scrap reduction. Huge improvement in the bottom line. I spent months on that and AI could have done it in minutes. So yes, it not only can be used, they would be foolish to not try. The legality, ethics and morality are not the domain of AI. Humans need to keep a reign on it. 
    • New to this forum.  Also looking to tune a 6L80 and trying to work out all the issues in my transmission swap.  I have a 6.2 diesel (1983) and have removed the TH-400 and about to put in a 6L80 with a TCM-2600 interface and don't have a clue what I doing after that.  Did you (Leatherneck/RAV3) get your slip resolved? I too hate to spend that kind of money on a tuner that hopefully I will not need too many times although from what steelerdude15 added about the HP Tuner being great for diagnostics would be a plus.  I am also from WNC but below you in Columbus.  Any helo would be greatly appreciated.  
    • Sounds like a smart reasonable person with common sense. Bill O’Riley never said he was just a journalist, by the way.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...