Jump to content

Anybody running level kits??

Flash23

By Flash23
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

gSwift Enthusiast

gSwift

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 3/7/2021 at 5:06 PM, Alpha7 said:

Don’t bother with leaving kit. 
 

every shop I went to said that everyone that put a leveling kit on there 2500 hates it to either leave it as is and just put bigger tires if you want that can fit or put an actual suspension lift kit. One of the shops straight up just said they wouldn’t even do leveling kit on 2500s that it was just a waste of time and money.  
 

 

This is 100% false!  The shops that say " oh i'd never run a leveling kit" most likely only deal with people that want to spend $300-$500 on a kit and then expect it to ride the same or better. I was that guy a few years ago. I had a 2" leveling kit on my last truck that cost like $150 bucks and it rode like garbage.

 

But, I can tell you that my Cognito set up rides like a freakin dream and i'd put the ride quality of this kit up against any "proper" lift kit on the market. After my leveling kit nightmare, I spent 5k on my last truck suspension and it had Fox coilovers with the external resi's and that kit rode way better than the leveling kit, but it rode like a log wagon compared to the leveling kit on my 2500.

 

There's a reason why a Cognito leveling kit runs north of 2k with the Fox upgrade vs all the other's, and its because of the amount of R&D they put into their kits. You get what you pay for. If someone is cheap enough to skimp on the suspension of their 60-80k truck, then they will get exactly what they deserve when it comes to the ride quality.

Edited by gSwift
gSwift Enthusiast

gSwift

Posted
Posted
On 3/8/2021 at 7:22 AM, CobraEatr said:

Swift, your truck is the reason why I want the Cognito premier kit. I saw it on this board last week while searching leveling kits. It looks awesome. That’s the exact look I’m going for. 

Will you be running your stock wheels as well? And 37's or 35's? I had 37x12.50's but keep in mind that I had to run a 1" hubcentric spacer in order for the inside of my tires to clear my Cognito UCA's when at full lock. If you plan on aftermarket wheels then you'll want to do your research on an offset that will clear everything.

 

Good luck and post pics when its done.

CobraEatr Enthusiast

CobraEatr

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, gSwift said:

Will you be running your stock wheels as well? And 37's or 35's? I had 37x12.50's but keep in mind that I had to run a 1" hubcentric spacer in order for the inside of my tires to clear my Cognito UCA's when at full lock. If you plan on aftermarket wheels then you'll want to do your research on an offset that will clear everything.

 

Good luck and post pics when its done.

I’m going to run stock wheels. I saw today in the “how have you modded your truck” thread that you used spacers. I was disappointed when I read that because I would prefer not to use spacers. I like the tires tucked in as much as possible. I wanted to go with 37x12.50x20 Nitto Trail or Ridge Grapplers. 
 

If you have any more pics of your truck I would love to see them. Any and all angles. I may end up just using the spacers. How bad was the tire/UCA rub at full lock before you added the spacers? 

gSwift Enthusiast

gSwift

Posted
Posted
On 3/9/2021 at 9:02 PM, CobraEatr said:

I’m going to run stock wheels. I saw today in the “how have you modded your truck” thread that you used spacers. I was disappointed when I read that because I would prefer not to use spacers. I like the tires tucked in as much as possible. I wanted to go with 37x12.50x20 Nitto Trail or Ridge Grapplers. 
 

If you have any more pics of your truck I would love to see them. Any and all angles. I may end up just using the spacers. How bad was the tire/UCA rub at full lock before you added the spacers? 

It still stayed pretty tucked. Honestly I think it made the stock wheel and 37" tire combo look even better. I've always been anti spacer too, but with this one being hubcentric I didn't have a single vibration or anything. There was another user here that tried to use a cheaper spacer and it vibrated, he then swapped to the one I use and his vibrations stopped.  I did have to trim about a 1/4" off my factory wheel stud, but the last 1/4" isn't threaded anyways so you're not losing any useable thread.

 

 

CE6535DF-20F4-436B-A3D2-2AFCD5F880F1.jpeg

CobraEatr Enthusiast

CobraEatr

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, gSwift said:

It still stayed pretty tucked. Honestly I think it made the stock wheel and 37" tire combo look even better. I've always been anti spacer too, but with this one being hubcentric I didn't have a single vibration or anything. There was another user here that tried to use a cheaper spacer and it vibrated, he then swapped to the one I use and his vibrations stopped.  I did have to trim about a 1/4" off my factory wheel stud, but the last 1/4" isn't threaded anyways so you're not losing any useable thread.

 

 

CE6535DF-20F4-436B-A3D2-2AFCD5F880F1.jpeg

Wow, that looks really good. Before you added the spacer, how bad was the rubbing? Was it something you could have lived with? 

gSwift Enthusiast

gSwift

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, CobraEatr said:

Wow, that looks really good. Before you added the spacer, how bad was the rubbing? Was it something you could have lived with? 

The inside of the tire rubs the Cognito control arm at full lock real bad, the rubbing on the liner was minor and easily fixed with very little trimming. But the tire/control arm rub was so bad that the inside of the Ridgegrappler would grab the metal control arm and almost bring you to a full stop. Theres no way around running 37x12.50's on the factory offset wheels and the Cognito UCA's unless you run the spacer. 

 

Cognito told me from the beginning that it wouldn't work but I figured i'd risk it and find a solution. If i had it all to do over again I wouldn't change a single thing. The ride quality is truly unbelievable and everyone that rode in it couldn't believe how well it rode. 

gSwift Enthusiast

gSwift

Posted
Posted

Actually, Nitto makes a 37x11.50 which actually may give you all the room you may need. I didn't know they had a 11.50 until I had already bought my 12.50's. But I still think the spacer bringing the wheel out some completed the look

CobraEatr Enthusiast

CobraEatr

Posted
Posted
On 3/12/2021 at 7:11 PM, gSwift said:

Actually, Nitto makes a 37x11.50 which actually may give you all the room you may need. I didn't know they had a 11.50 until I had already bought my 12.50's. But I still think the spacer bringing the wheel out some completed the look

That’s a great idea. Thanks swift! Maybe the 1” difference in width will keep the tires from touching the UCA. 

  • 3 years later...
Cnelson New Member

Cnelson

Posted
Posted

Hi, thanks for all the detail in this thread. I wanted to ask your opinion on shocks. I’m pulling the trigger on a congnito level kit for a 2024 2500. My question is do you think the ride is as good as factory with the Fox 2.0s or are the Elka or Fox 2.5s worth the upgrade? This is only for aesthetics. Very limited off roading. I do tow often. Thanks! 

revrnd Senior Enthusiast

revrnd

Posted
Posted (edited)

My 2 cents on levelling kits/reindexed keys...

 

On my 2004 2500HD I had installed them, only to realize when I bought & towed a travel trailer (5000#) that it made the rear squat. Even though the tongue weight was 500#, I got a WD hitch to level that truck & my 2011 truck. When I got my 2017, It appeared that the WD hitch wasn't req'd. The truck didn't squat w/ the load (I still use a sway control).

Edited by revrnd
bruceb58 Enthusiast

bruceb58

Posted
Posted (edited)

Never understood why people level trucks that tow or actually use their truck as a truck. There is a rake for a reason.

 

I use a WDH with my 6500# trailer that has 800# of tongue weight.

Edited by bruceb58
  • Like 3
Epsilon Plus Enthusiast

Epsilon Plus

Posted
Posted

Shocks will do nothing to soften the ride of such a heavily sprung truck unless you are fully loaded or towing heavy. Those monster springs need to compress before the shock can dampen the compression and rebound. These trucks have payloads of 3,000+lbs. Those springs aren't easily compressed by potholes and speed bumps.

 

As far as a factory driving level kit, the king of kings is the ZR2 suspension swap. Pros are factory suspension geometry, fit 37s, and low cost parts. Cons are it's not for wrench novices and consists of the same amount of work as doing a full 4"+ lift kit for a mere 1.5".

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined

  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,008 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • dna9656
      No low range 4 x 4

      By dna9656 · Posted

      My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • asilverblazer
      Transmission Woes :-(

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • asilverblazer
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • Chuck FB
      summer road trips in the 2026 2500HD

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Aimatdeer
      Ac not keeping up

      By Aimatdeer · Posted

      Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...