Jump to content

Putco 60" Blade Red/Amber/White installed on 2021 2500 HD

powderMonkey
 Share

Recommended Posts

powderMonkey Enthusiast

powderMonkey

Posted
Posted

This went well, but there is one gotcha that I wasn't expecting.  Total install time was 1.5 hours.

 

I installed the 60" Blade Red/Amber/White Part 92009-60 using Putco Harness 529005 on my 2021 2500 HD.  There is no splicing wires or scotch-loks needed, this is a totally plug and play solution for 2020/2021 HD's.

 

Basically you are unplugging a multi-pin factory connector head on either side of the spare tire, and then plugging the harness into each end of that. And then plugging the standard 4-pin trailer connector and single wire on the other part of the harness, into the 4-pin and single lead on the BLADE tailgate light bar.  Other than routing and zip-tying up the harness behind the bumper - that is it.

 

I performed this without removing the tailgate.  I'm a 6' 215lb guy and there was enough room for me to reach up behind the bumper and get one fingers on the lightbar, and the other hand reaching in between the bumper and tailgate from the outside to get it positioned before sticking it down.

 

The gotcha is that there is a new factroy GM non-weight bearing bracket that helps prevent lateral tailgate movement, that is in the way of the lightbar itself on our 2020/21 HD's.  The answer to that I found by googling, is on Putco's own small forum for their products.

 

Thread -> Putco Blade Thread on 2020-21 HD's

 

The last post in the above thread (post #3) shows to simply reposition the bracket on the blade 4" to the right of the GM bracket, and mount the BLADE over top of the tailgate bracket.  I've included the pictures from that thread, as well as a picture of my completed install.  Without getting down and looking into the small area, you can't tell that the one end it on top of somthing.

 

Just wanted to post some info for others.

 

 

 

image_98.jpg

image_99 (1).jpg

Screenshot_20210308-131715_Gallery.jpg

powderMonkey Enthusiast

powderMonkey

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks CT.  I saw a BLADE on a co-workers 2018 2500HD High Country Duramax and instantly had to have one also.  ; )

cdh7917 Enthusiast

cdh7917

Posted
Posted

I had this light bar on my 2020 2500 AT4HD.  It began to malfunction, but Putco replaced it with a brand new complete kit (new wiring harness, clips, etc) under warranty.  Their customer service is fantastic.

 

I haven't installed the new one yet because I ended up trading my 2500 in for a 3500 that is yet to be built.

 

I did notice in the new kit from Putco that I have two sets of brackets, which is something new compared to the first kit I bought.  The first set of brackets has a thinner base and would be used if you didn't have that tailgate bracket you ran into.

 

The second set of brackets has a thicker base that accommodates the tailgate bracket, essentially lifting the Blade bar off truck body surface so that the entire Blade is evenly placed in front of that bracket.

 

Install is definitely easier with the tailgate removed, but you have me considering trying to install it on the new truck without removing the tailgate.

 

As for the Blade itself, it's a really nice product.  The extra light from the reverse function is well worth it.

powderMonkey Enthusiast

powderMonkey

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Glad to hear two things - one that Putco stands behind their parts - and two about those newer brackets! Man I must have gotten old stock! Had mine been packaged with the taller brackets I'd have used those for sure!

 

Trust me you can do it without removing the tailgate.  You can get your hand up under the bumper and get some fingertips into that area. 

 

I stuck all four pieces of two-sided tape to the brackets first which were snapped onto the light bar and spaced out how I wanted them. I left the rear backing on the two-sided tape. I started all four corners of the rear backing and creased them over.  When I was set and ready, I pulled the backing down from the passenger side bracket so it was hanging down where I could get to it. Flipped the light bar over, and I stuck it down. Did the drivers side next - set the two ends then did the middle two keeping it all level. I was able to pull backing off with the light bar lights facing me. I did this to keep the tape from getting contaminated or sticking to something before I was ready.

  • Like 1
CT Chevy Connoisseur Enthusiast

CT Chevy Connoisseur

Posted
Posted

Thoughts on the GoRecon lightbar compared to this one?  Also do you have to order the wiring kit seperately?  Does the kit that is sold by Chevy include the wiring kit as it is based on VIN?

 

Thanks!!

CT Chevy Connoisseur Enthusiast

CT Chevy Connoisseur

Posted
Posted
23 hours ago, cdh7917 said:

I had this light bar on my 2020 2500 AT4HD.  It began to malfunction, but Putco replaced it with a brand new complete kit (new wiring harness, clips, etc) under warranty.  Their customer service is fantastic.

 

I haven't installed the new one yet because I ended up trading my 2500 in for a 3500 that is yet to be built.

 

I did notice in the new kit from Putco that I have two sets of brackets, which is something new compared to the first kit I bought.  The first set of brackets has a thinner base and would be used if you didn't have that tailgate bracket you ran into.

 

The second set of brackets has a thicker base that accommodates the tailgate bracket, essentially lifting the Blade bar off truck body surface so that the entire Blade is evenly placed in front of that bracket.

 

Install is definitely easier with the tailgate removed, but you have me considering trying to install it on the new truck without removing the tailgate.

 

As for the Blade itself, it's a really nice product.  The extra light from the reverse function is well worth it.

I suppose the fact that there are clips instead of 3M tape all the way across makes it easier to replace if there's an issue

cdh7917 Enthusiast

cdh7917

Posted
Posted
Just now, CT Chevy Connoisseur said:

I suppose the fact that there are clips instead of 3M tape all the way across makes it easier to replace if there's an issue

In theory, it would. 

 

Had I gone about the reinstall/replacement on my 2020, I would have removed the older/thinner brackets and started from scratch again with the thicker brackets that are designed to clear the tailgate alignment bracket on the truck.

 

But yes, once the Putco brackets are installed (with 3M VHB tape, as supplied) the Blade light bar clips into the brackets.  It's a secure and snug fit but replacement would be fairly easy if you had problems.

  • 2 months later...
Greg4524 New Member

Greg4524

Posted
Posted

Just curious why you chose the amber instead of the blade red?

 

just bought an 18 2500hd and it doesn’t have any amber lights in the back, so I got the blade with only red and white so it matches the trucks colors and functions of the taillights 

  • 2 weeks later...
powderMonkey Enthusiast

powderMonkey

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 5/17/2021 at 6:57 AM, Greg4524 said:

Just curious why you chose the amber instead of the blade red?

 

just bought an 18 2500hd and it doesn’t have any amber lights in the back, so I got the blade with only red and white so it matches the trucks colors and functions of the taillights 

So there is a story behind that choice...

 

Before I chose a color I googled around a bit, and found out that the DOT allowed the change from rear signal from amber being mandatory, to red some years ago. The article pointed out that the next year, there was a 37% increase collisions where lane changes or turning was a contributing factor. Theory is, that if you see a single flash of amber - you know it's a turn signal.  If you see a single flash of red at the rear, you don't know whether it's just a brake touch or a signal. Made sense to me, and it gave me a reason to choose one over the other. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • richard wysong
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By richard wysong · Posted

      I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • James Beyer
      Trading 7.3 (Godzilla) for G.M.C gas

      By James Beyer · Posted

      Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • asilverblazer
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • Coastie05
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...