Jump to content

mass air went bye bye

02denali

Recommended Posts

02denali Enthusiast

02denali

Posted
Posted

well my Z06 mass air went south. am going to have to get another one. put in a granatelli for now but she isnt running as good. will have to wait. got beat last night by a fellow chevy driver, man i need to get another one. :confused::crazy::(

Black02Silverado Senior Enthusiast

Black02Silverado

Posted
Posted

Help me out here. You had a Z06 MAS installed on the truck? The same MAS that goes on the Z06 vette? Didn't think that would work. What do they cost? I know my Ganatelli didn't seem to make a difference but then I didn't change much of anything else on the truck either.

02denali Enthusiast

02denali

Posted
  • Author
Posted

yes i did have one. and will again. it goes higher in flow i think.29.98 for the granatelli. if i remember correctly my Z06 went highter, i have another one on the way and i will give exact specs

SportSide 5.3 Enthusiast

SportSide 5.3

Posted
Posted

anywhere in particular you bought your ZO6 MAF or just found one off a vette? I'd like to go to a local junk yard and find one if you say it works well?

 

thanks

1BADHD Enthusiast

1BADHD

Posted
Posted
anywhere in particular you bought your ZO6 MAF or just found one off a vette? I'd like to go to a local junk yard and find one if you say it works well?

 

thanks

:thumbs: Ebay!

SportSide 5.3 Enthusiast

SportSide 5.3

Posted
Posted

yeah, i went lookin and saw one there also :cheers: did you descreen yours? From what i here, descreening doesn't help at all, and infact may decrease a bit of hp.....? Mine is descreened but i cant tell either way if it helped or hurt...

02denali Enthusiast

02denali

Posted
  • Author
Posted

actually the Z06 mass air comes descreened from the factory. gm descreened it themselves.

granatelli---------29.98

stock with screen--28.92

Z06-----------------34.08

i did several runs and these are the numbers they posted up the most.

these reading came at wot at around 5800 to 5900 rpms when i am getting rady to shift.yes it is a direct bolt on. :cheers:

02denali Enthusiast

02denali

Posted
  • Author
Posted

25341604 is the part number i have orderedfrom gm parts direct. and if you look it up you need to look it up for the 2002 or 2003 corvette. and lyndon can tune a little for it also. allen tuned mine and it is awsome.dont know if it is just my set up but mine is working out great for me. and it does work better for me than a granatelli. good luck man.keep me posted how it works if you get it. :cheers:

02denali Enthusiast

02denali

Posted
  • Author
Posted

not sure if you will be able to tell right away. i did gain a difference before it was tuned in. but it will not hurt and it is gm. :fume:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • ryan35205
      Lets Talk Z60 Suspension

      By ryan35205 · Posted

      Did the KYBs keep it the same height in the front? I was concerned that pre-assembled assembly would raise it up an inch to standard non-z60 height.. I guess which it would make the rake 1 inch instead of 2 inches.
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Thank you for keeping the train on the tracks and for a thoughtful engagement. I enjoyed the reflection on a previous stance to refine and improve your position. I like that inquisitive flexibility about you Atlas.    No the process isn't sterile. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of miles of piping, vessels, pumps. Chevron, the people I worked for, were keenly aware that there is a market for what is known as their "ISOCLEAN" line of lubricants. These are lubricants that are the same as those sold bulk that are further processed by filtration to a level your particular application demands. They will filter and package and provide lab documentation as required. Do not kid yourself. Every gallon of oil that goes into a Chevron Turbine, reciprocating compressor, generator is prefiltered and tested before being charged. Lest wise it was when I was there in the plants I worked in.    There are requirements set by manufactures for the cleanliness of the oils used in their equipment. OTR such as CUMMINS has standards shared with customers on this. Commercial interest selling to Ma and Pa do, but don't share that information. Not even upon request but internally, they do exist.    The GM study sited, (Graph from Machinery Lubrication in previous post) only shows "relative" importance.  I find that fascinating. By constructing the graph like this they admit there are dozens of factors in engine life and via scientific method determined the effect of 'relative cleanliness' on engine life not in miles but in 'FACTORS'. This allows a certain amount of reverse engineering does it not?   They even provided some touchstones. Beta 75 as a reference point. Wonderful stuff!!   Smaller blenders CAN and some DO take the time and effort to do better than a refinery or large bulk blender, like Warren Oil, in improving the "in the can" cleanliness. No I don't have a list but testing could generate that information.    Again, but one of several levers we can pull to improve engine life. The simplest is keeping a clean work station while doing your own oil changes.     
    • Mykel544
      New Guy from Oklahoma

      By Mykel544 · Posted

      Thank you. I'll give it a try 
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      I just spent the last 45K miles doing samples every oil change over more than a full year to get the data for seasons and break-in to broke in.    I found the same thing to be true. Something was always teetering on done or had stepped off the cliff long before the OLM was DOA. In fact, I found about a thousand mile difference between summer and winter. That is during the winter half the OLM was STILL too long. Even the severe schedule was to long in the winter.   Now having done the work I can say I was NOT DISAPOINTED. I saw nothing I didn't already know. Nothing my father hadn't already demonstrated in his 2K OCI's pushing dated iron on dated oils and weak filters to mileages well beyond 300K.   Building on his work through use of Lab testing it wasn't hard to find the correlation between 'sight/feel/odor, the things dad relied on, and test results. Use of current viscosity stable chemistries & filters has pushed that marker for my motors out to 3K summer, 4K winter.    So the early lies were 3K on conventional oil and the lie upon the lie was 7K+. turns out to be off by a factor of two.    So... it is true that modern chemistry has doubled the useful oil life. But the base milage that came from was off by double. It's how good lies work. Partly true, sometimes mostly true so that your meter isn't set off. It also means that non-shear-stable shelf oils are only now as good as the old oils were in their best case scenario.    So the question now is how do we improve on that? Thus the question into cleanliness among the other items listed in the post quoted below.    If this bores you, feel free not to participate.       
    • newdude
      2027 Chevrolet Silverado: Official Discussion

      By newdude · Posted

      Is it though?  Like LTZ, not a high take rate.  Current Sierra has AT4, Denali and Elevation as its main bread winners.  Each trim accounting for 25-35% of sales for Sierra.  SLT makes up about 10-15% at best.        Like others have predicted here for GMC, it will be:   - Pro (equal to WT Chevy)   - Elevation (replaces SLE and SLT)   - AT4 (and X)   - Denali (and Ultimate).  

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...