Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

We're do for our (first) scheduled 100,000 mile transmission fluid change on our '08 4 speed automatic trans and our regular servicing shop says they have a machine the flushes the trans and replaced "all" 12 quarts of fluid. One of the remarks that throws me is hearing that the filter gets flushed.

I really don't know the details of the procedure as I didn't know what to ask.

I have read opinions on both sides of the fence but don't know the basis of the opinions, irregardless of which side of the fence they are on.

I would appreciate hearing from anyone with first hand experiences with that so I can make an informed decision.

Posted

I would suggest not getting a flush persay but do the slow drain method, using the cooler line.  This method does replace all the tranny fluid with new, and also doing this method the filter would be changed, not flushed.

 

 

Here is a write up/how to from one of the site members.   https://www.truckmodcentral.com/threads/how-to-flush-your-transmission-on-a-gmt800-gm-truck.4699/

 

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Sharpz said:

I would suggest not getting a flush persay but do the slow drain method, using the cooler line.  This method does replace all the tranny fluid with new, and also doing this method the filter would be changed, not flushed.

 

 

Here is a write up/how to from one of the site members.   https://www.truckmodcentral.com/threads/how-to-flush-your-transmission-on-a-gmt800-gm-truck.4699/

 

 

If only I had a pan with a drain bolt. What was Chevy thinking eliminating the drain plug?

Does the fill tube go directly into the pan? If so, maybe the pan could be pumped out before dropping it.

Edited by Beamie
Posted
8 hours ago, Beamie said:

 

If only I had a pan with a drain bolt. What was Chevy thinking eliminating the drain plug?

Does the fill tube go directly into the pan? If so, maybe the pan could be pumped out before dropping it.

even with out the drain hole, you just unbolt the pan (evenly and slowly) if you do it right you can prevent a huge mess, but its not perfect.  You can also purchase a new pan relatively cheap (last I looked) with a drain screw.  

 

https://www.amazon.com/Transmission-Chevrolet-Silverado-Suburban-Workhorse/dp/B07GJF6WYN/ref=sr_1_2?_encoding=UTF8&dchild=1&qid=1630754314&s=automotive&sr=1-2&vehicle=2004-48-548-296-29-77-6-8-7910--9--145--2&vehicleName=2004+GMC+Sierra+1500

 

you will have to verify that you have the 4l80e trans.  Gasket and filter sold separately.  There are also plenty of you tube videos on "how to"  if you didnt find what you needed in the video I suggested to you.

Posted
1 hour ago, Sharpz said:

even with out the drain hole, you just unbolt the pan (evenly and slowly) if you do it right you can prevent a huge mess, but its not perfect.  You can also purchase a new pan relatively cheap (last I looked) with a drain screw.  

 

https://www.amazon.com/Transmission-Chevrolet-Silverado-Suburban-Workhorse/dp/B07GJF6WYN/ref=sr_1_2?_encoding=UTF8&dchild=1&qid=1630754314&s=automotive&sr=1-2&vehicle=2004-48-548-296-29-77-6-8-7910--9--145--2&vehicleName=2004+GMC+Sierra+1500

 

you will have to verify that you have the 4l80e trans.  Gasket and filter sold separately.  There are also plenty of you tube videos on "how to"  if you didnt find what you needed in the video I suggested to you.

Thanks. That pan may not be compatible as my pan is stepped but maybe there is something else in the alternates list there..

I've seen the videos and that's what makes me think twice about the potential mess removing the full pan. No lift here so it would be in close quarters, on the back, in the driveway for the pan removal and I don't want an oil spill. The exhaust crossover will run interference making the "careful" removal all that much more iffy. If the pan were mostly empty it would make the removal procedure less of a potential problem.

 

Posted

I had the same question a while back.  I have '11 GMC Sierra 4x4 with 134k miles I bought used from a dealer 18 mos ago.  I felt the dealership might have changed the fluid when I bought because it was bright red.  Even though the fluid was stil a good color at 129k it was slightly less red than when I bought it.  So,,,, do I flush, or just change fluid?  The dealership and two trans shops said don't change it at all...leave it alone.... because a change not done at 100k miles like the manual says do I might get a trans failure.  But, knowing shops "might" have a built in bias, and after getting opinions from others on here (and mostly from Ray Voy) I decided to do the change, not flush.  I knew I was running a risk (at least according to shop and dealership advice), but I did it.  After 4k miles after the change I have No problems.  However, in your case, you are right on 100k miles.  So....in your case....I would go with whatever the owner manual says. If says flush, I'd flush.  If it says change, I'd change.  I'd go with the owner manual.  In my case, though I was well over the 100k mark by 29k miles. 

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Jworks said:

I had the same question a while back.  I have '11 GMC Sierra 4x4 with 134k miles I bought used from a dealer 18 mos ago.  I felt the dealership might have changed the fluid when I bought because it was bright red.  Even though the fluid was stil a good color at 129k it was slightly less red than when I bought it.  So,,,, do I flush, or just change fluid?  The dealership and two trans shops said don't change it at all...leave it alone.... because a change not done at 100k miles like the manual says do I might get a trans failure.  But, knowing shops "might" have a built in bias, and after getting opinions from others on here (and mostly from Ray Voy) I decided to do the change, not flush.  I knew I was running a risk (at least according to shop and dealership advice), but I did it.  After 4k miles after the change I have No problems.  However, in your case, you are right on 100k miles.  So....in your case....I would go with whatever the owner manual says. If says flush, I'd flush.  If it says change, I'd change.  I'd go with the owner manual.  In my case, though I was well over the 100k mark by 29k miles. 

Thanks for that.

As far as I can see the manual just has a table with a dot in the "change fluid and filter" without getting into the details.

 

For yours, were they implying that merely swapping out 5 or so quarts of new for old fluid was a risk?

I don't understand how dropping the pan, draining and cleaning the pan is anything but good. 

 

Edited by Beamie
Posted

At that mileage, I would change the filter out. 

 

That being said,  the procedure at the dealer doesn't do anything but a fluid exchange.  They hook up a tank with two bladders.  One on top of the other.  They fill the bottom bladder with new fluid, hook up to the cooler lines and start the vehicle.  As the vehicle runs it puts the old fluid into the top bladder which pushes down on the bottom bladder and pushes the new fluid into the system.  They use more than what the total capacity of the transmission uses so that they get a complete exchange of fluid.

 

The transmission does all the work.  No force or anything like that.  When they are done and the bottom bladder is empty, they disconnect everything and hook back up to the vehicle and then top off as needed.

 

If you did this and didn't change the filter then you have a dirty filter.  The new fluid doesn't do anything to it.  That is why it is better to change out the filter and then do the fluid exchange.

 

I had the dealer do my 2002 Silverado at around 10k miles from new and installed AMSOIL. I then dropped the pan and changed out the filter at around 70k miles.  Here is my write-up on it.

 

I have done the same thing now on our 2016 suburban.

 

I've changed out several GM truck transmission with over 100k miles with no issues.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Black02Silverado said:

At that mileage, I would change the filter out. 

 

That being said,  the procedure at the dealer doesn't do anything but a fluid exchange.  They hook up a tank with two bladders.  One on top of the other.  They fill the bottom bladder with new fluid, hook up to the cooler lines and start the vehicle.  As the vehicle runs it puts the old fluid into the top bladder which pushes down on the bottom bladder and pushes the new fluid into the system.  They use more than what the total capacity of the transmission uses so that they get a complete exchange of fluid.

 

The transmission does all the work.  No force or anything like that.  When they are done and the bottom bladder is empty, they disconnect everything and hook back up to the vehicle and then top off as needed.

 

If you did this and didn't change the filter then you have a dirty filter.  The new fluid doesn't do anything to it.  That is why it is better to change out the filter and then do the fluid exchange.

 

I had the dealer do my 2002 Silverado at around 10k miles from new and installed AMSOIL. I then dropped the pan and changed out the filter at around 70k miles.  Here is my write-up on it.

 

I have done the same thing now on our 2016 suburban.

 

I've changed out several GM truck transmission with over 100k miles with no issues.

 

The shop claims they "flush" the filter and that caused concern. Sitting on the fence but thinking I won't have them do it, just in case. Maybe I'll try to reduce the fluid in the pan through the dipstick tube and a vacuum pump and then try to drop the pan and access the filter. The crossover pipe is a potential hurdle.

Is there any harm to be done with a conventional pan drop/filter change with just changing the pan fluid?

I recall a former Tahoe with that done and tranny burning smell a short while later.

Edited by Beamie
Posted
 

 

The shop claims they "flush" the filter and that caused concern. Sitting on the fence but thinking I won't have them do it, just in case. Maybe I'll try to reduce the fluid in the pan through the dipstick tube and a vacuum pump and then try to drop the pan and access the filter. The crossover pipe is a potential hurdle.

Is there any harm to be done with a conventional pan drop/filter change with just changing the pan fluid?

I recall a former Tahoe with that done and tranny burning smell a short while later.

I don't know their procedure, but to me you don't want to "flush" the filter and have all that debris flowing through your transmission.   Dropping the pan with the cross over exhaust pipe can be a challenge.  Some can get the pan off some can't.  I had to drop my exhaust down some to get mine off.  Nothing else that I could do,  ie jack up the transmission tail shaft after loosening the cross-member bolts and pull down on the exhaust didn't work for me.  After that mess I put a drain plug in my transmission pan.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Black02Silverado said:

I don't know their procedure, but to me you don't want to "flush" the filter and have all that debris flowing through your transmission.   Dropping the pan with the cross over exhaust pipe can be a challenge.  Some can get the pan off some can't.  I had to drop my exhaust down some to get mine off.  Nothing else that I could do,  ie jack up the transmission tail shaft after loosening the cross-member bolts and pull down on the exhaust didn't work for me.  After that mess I put a drain plug in my transmission pan.

 

Searching for more clarity, would the transmissions be circulating all the debris all the time when they run?

Posted
 

 

Searching for more clarity, would the transmissions be circulating all the debris all the time when they run?

No, that is why there is a filter.  But if they are saying they flush the filter then that makes me believe that it pushed what the filter caught out into the fluid and you don't want that.  Drop the pan, remove the filter that is dirty, replace with new and go from there.

 

Dexron VI has been out since 2006 so it is a better fluid then the old dexron III but GM's isn't a full synthetic

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,821 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...