Jump to content

6.2 engine fuel

Bherm

By Bherm
in Troubleshooting, Warranty & Recalls

 Share

Recommended Posts

M1ck3y Senior Enthusiast

M1ck3y

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, Supreme Pizza said:

All I can say about octane is that you must use at least the minimum octane rating recommended by the manufacturer.

 

So why does it always say "minimum octane rating". Well, because more is OK, less is death.

 

Higher octane doesn't make a car faster, but higher octane is required by faster cars.

 

More octane = less volatile fuel.

 

You can raise your octane rating by diluting your fuel with a less volatile fuel, like kerosene.

 

High octane fuel should be cheaper than low octane fuel. But its not. Because people that need high octane fuel have more money. And because people think paying more for fuel will get you better fuel.

 

If the fuel is "too combustible", then it will ignite before the spark happens. That is called pre-ignition, spark knock, or detonation.  High compression engines have issues with pre-ignition, so they use higher octane fuel, so that the gas wont "blow up" before its supposed to during the compression cycle. Its counter-intuitive, but lower grade (deluted) fuel works better for higher compression engines. I see people put "octane booster" or "premium gas" in their crappy cars, hoping it will make them faster or more reliable. Doesn't work that way. You want to use the minimum octane fuel that is acceptable for your engine. Low octane fuel is more powerful than high octane fuel.

 

 

BLOG06_180419780_AR_0_UQSWVLQCCQFO.jpg

 

RCF71 Enthusiast

RCF71

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 12/21/2021 at 2:07 AM, Supreme Pizza said:

All I can say about octane is that you must use at least the minimum octane rating recommended by the manufacturer.

 

So why does it always say "minimum octane rating". Well, because more is OK, less is death.

 

Higher octane doesn't make a car faster, but higher octane is required by faster cars.

 

More octane = less volatile fuel.

 

You can raise your octane rating by diluting your fuel with a less volatile fuel, like kerosene.

 

High octane fuel should be cheaper than low octane fuel. But its not. Because people that need high octane fuel have more money. And because people think paying more for fuel will get you better fuel.

 

If the fuel is "too combustible", then it will ignite before the spark happens. That is called pre-ignition, spark knock, or detonation.  High compression engines have issues with pre-ignition, so they use higher octane fuel, so that the gas wont "blow up" before its supposed to during the compression cycle. Its counter-intuitive, but lower grade (deluted) fuel works better for higher compression engines. I see people put "octane booster" or "premium gas" in their crappy cars, hoping it will make them faster or more reliable. Doesn't work that way. You want to use the minimum octane fuel that is acceptable for your engine. Low octane fuel is more powerful than high octane fuel.

 

 

BLOG06_180419780_AR_0_UQSWVLQCCQFO.jpg


All of that bolded info is incorrect.

Edited by RCF71
Accuracy
  • Like 1
Supreme Pizza Senior Enthusiast

Supreme Pizza

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, RCF71 said:


All of that bolded info is incorrect.

 

 

 "I see people put "octane booster" or "premium gas" in their crappy cars, hoping it will make them faster or more reliable."

 

How is this statement incorrect in any way? And how would you be able to determine if I have seen people pour octane booster into their Geo Metro, while they were bragging about how much faster it makes their car?

 

Anyway,

 

I would suggest that people do their own research and choose the option that they feel is best. Especially when its something as important as using the correct octane, diet, medical treatments, vehicle to purchase, the best brand of refrigerator, etc.

 

Read the forums, talk to the experts, research all the available information, and draw your own conclusions. Facts and opinions can be a grey area. Interpretation can be a factor as well.

 

Even if one direction is the "correct direction" for most, its not going to be ideal for all.

 

Don't follow anyone's advice, but rather use that advise in combination with your other sources of information in order to make the decision that you feel will suit your needs the best.

RCF71 Enthusiast

RCF71

Posted
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, Supreme Pizza said:

 

 

 "I see people put "octane booster" or "premium gas" in their crappy cars, hoping it will make them faster or more reliable."

 

How is this statement incorrect in any way? And how would you be able to determine if I have seen people pour octane booster into their Geo Metro, while they were bragging about how much faster it makes their car?

Ok, fixed it.


A few notes:

 

- octane and volatility are not correlated, octane has more to do with the chemical structure of each molecule, not its size (which is what most affects volatility)

- higher octane fuel is definitely not cheaper to produce, refineries have processing units that cost 100’s of millions of dollars to convert low octane molecules into higher octane molecules… why should higher octane fuel be cheaper?

- lower octane is not “more combustible”, it simply has a lower activation energy - combustion is a chemical reaction, and all reactions need a certain amount of energy to start/continue

- “diluted” fuel is not better for high compression engines, unless you are “diluting” the gasoline portion with an additive that has much higher octane (ethanol, methanol, mtbe, etc)

- lower octane fuel may or may not have more energy than higher octane fuel, again, not directly correlated.  In the case of ethanol addition to raise octane, it is true that the energy content is lowered (ethanol has approx. 30% lower energy content than typical gasoline)

- do not put kerosene in your gasoline, it will not burn completely and will leave you with carbon deposits (at best, because it will not vaporize and mix thoroughly), but kerosene can go into diesel to lower power pour point/prevent gelling

 

 

Edited by RCF71
  • Like 1
TJay74 Senior Enthusiast

TJay74

Posted
Posted

To reinforce what RCF71 just said:

Lower octane fuel burns faster, but doesnt produce more BTU's (energy) than higher octane fuel. The speed of the burn from the octane is what can cause the issue when used in a engine that has a high compression ration.

The sound of detonation or knock is caused when pre-ignition happens. As the fuel-air mix is pushed into the combustion chamber and is compressed the leading edges of the valve or the valve reliefs on the pistons can be hot enough they ignite the fuel-air mix before the top of the compression cycle and before the spark plug actually fires to ignite the fuel-air mix. This causes an issue due to when the hot spot in the chamber ignites the fuel-air mix it starts a flame front (propagation) to race across the combustion chamber. As the flame front is racing across the chamber the spark plug then ignites the mix as well, now you have 2 different flame fronts traveling across the chamber towards each other at the speed of sound. When they collide the cause the audible "knock" or pinging that we hear. This also can cause damage of the knock is severe enough, when inspected the tops of the pistons will have marks on them similar to if you hit the piston top with a ball peen hammer.

The way you control this is with a higher octane fuel that burns slower and resists pre-ignition, this allows the spark plug to do its job and to ignite the fuel-air mix with a single spark source.

M1ck3y Senior Enthusiast

M1ck3y

Posted
Posted (edited)
57 minutes ago, TJay74 said:

To reinforce what RCF71 just said:

Lower octane fuel burns faster, but doesnt produce more BTU's (energy) than higher octane fuel. The speed of the burn from the octane is what can cause the issue when used in a engine that has a high compression ration.

The sound of detonation or knock is caused when pre-ignition happens. As the fuel-air mix is pushed into the combustion chamber and is compressed the leading edges of the valve or the valve reliefs on the pistons can be hot enough they ignite the fuel-air mix before the top of the compression cycle and before the spark plug actually fires to ignite the fuel-air mix. This causes an issue due to when the hot spot in the chamber ignites the fuel-air mix it starts a flame front (propagation) to race across the combustion chamber. As the flame front is racing across the chamber the spark plug then ignites the mix as well, now you have 2 different flame fronts traveling across the chamber towards each other at the speed of sound. When they collide the cause the audible "knock" or pinging that we hear. This also can cause damage of the knock is severe enough, when inspected the tops of the pistons will have marks on them similar to if you hit the piston top with a ball peen hammer.

The way you control this is with a higher octane fuel that burns slower and resists pre-ignition, this allows the spark plug to do its job and to ignite the fuel-air mix with a single spark source.

 

You shouldn't state that low octane fuel burns faster. It's entirely dependent on the composition of the fuel. Some of the highest octane fuels are also some of the fastest burning. Resistance to pre-ignition is the purpose of high octane. Burn speed really only becomes a factor when you have a high reving, high strung engine and you require a faster burn speed at high rpm's. Tuning is also a big factor here. Adjustments in timing can be made to accommodate the fuel's burn speed; making as much, or even more power then the slower burning fuel. Or vice versa for that matter..

Edited by M1ck3y
TJay74 Senior Enthusiast

TJay74

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, M1ck3y said:

 

You shouldn't state that low octane fuel burns faster. It's entirely dependent on the composition of the fuel. Some of the highest octane fuels are also some of the fastest burning. Resistance to pre-ignition is the purpose of high octane. Burn speed really only becomes a factor when you have a high reving, high strung engine and you require a faster burn speed at high rpm's. Tuning is also a big factor here. Adjustments in timing can be made to accommodate the fuel's burn speed; making as much, or even more power then the slower burning fuel. Or vice versa for that matter..

 

 

This was a very basic run down, once you get into oxygenated fuels you get into a whole new type of conversation.

TJay74 Senior Enthusiast

TJay74

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, swathdiver said:

I wonder how many folks know that ethanol is used to reduce spark knock these days?

 

Ethanol is a cheap and amazing way to get rid of knock. My 2016 6.2/A8 has been on E85 for 4 years now, it runs great. Even still if a person only has 91 they can add up to E10 with no harm. If the trucks tank is 26 gallons that means you can easily add 2.5-3 gallons of E85 to the 91, it will help with detonation and make the truck run better as well.

  • Thanks 1
GullLakeMi Enthusiast

GullLakeMi

Posted
Posted

I had a '16 with 6.2L and 8 speed.  Damn 8 speed was so clunky I often ran 87 octane.  Why the hell not.  Shitty transmission didn't deserve any better.  It's only $3k for the 6.2L.  Sold it after 5 years to CarMax for nearly what I paid for it excluding sales tax.

 

Don't see the reason to pamper a full-size truck when they consistently are at bottom of any reliability rating anyway.

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined

  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 384 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...