Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Why are you guys chopping up your wheelwells just to fit a 35" tire on it? 

Put a real lift kit on it and be done.

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
37 minutes ago, dieselfan1 said:

Why are you guys chopping up your wheelwells just to fit a 35" tire on it? 

Put a real lift kit on it and be done.

 

-Proper lift kits cost a lot of money

-IFS lift kits add complexity and part count

-Install may be past what some people can do on their own so more money spent at a shop

-Taller truck = may not fit in garage, parking garages, tight spaces, etc

-Taller truck = more drag so worse gas mileage

-Lower center of gravity is better on and off road

-It's their truck so who cares what they do with it?

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

If you are cutting or "chopping" anything you are doing it wrong. One zip tie on each wheel well to move the wheel well liner up a ball hair. Same thing can be done with a heat gun and a stick. A body mount chop is an entirely different animal and not something I'd recommend doing to a vehicle this nice although that's not that big of a deal either. Look up a NorCal mod. Takes five minutes and gives you a fair amount more room to stuff a bigger tire. 

 

4-6"+ lift kits don't look as good on these trucks as a 2" level with ~35 inch tires. Too much wheel well and you get the golf cart tire look. Although that is what most people on these forums do. It's as simple as a stuffed wheel well looks a lot better than an exposed wheel well. Now tire offset or wheel spacers is something different altogether as that pertains to the pushing of the tire out past the fenders. 

 

The guy above also hit on some other solid points although I didn't buy a truck to worry about MPG. Also worth pointing out that putting one of these 4" plus lift kits with "off-road" springs and coils is idiotic unless you spend a bunch of time off-road. You effectively are giving your vehicle an infinitely harsher ride on city & highway roads. Those are much firmer springs and struts than are meant for pavement as they are made to travel less when flexed. 

 

If you are trying to keep your ride quality and don't want to sink 10 grand into doing it right with 37's, a 2" level is a no brainer on these vehicles. Just because a bunch of other idiots do something doesn't make it the smart way to do it. Hence why you see so many 60 grand vehicles with garbage super rigid off-road suspensions on here,  a foot of wheel well and 35's that look comparatively small on the vehicle.

 

Read my other posts. I'm not trying to make fun of folks, nor do I care about how another grown adult spends their money. I'm simply trying to save folks from making an common mistake. When I first got into off-road vehicles, I always thought bigger was better aesthetically and you got what you paid for. It's a game of inches folks. Also, not everyone is running the baja5000. 6" isn't that much bigger than 2". And when you understand that that 4" goes directly to the wheel wells, or when you understand that off-road shocks are just really rigid shocks that suck on the pavement... It's not rocket science. 

 

Learned a long time ago the idea is not to "lift" the vehicle, but rather to "stance" the vehicle. Lots of first timers on this forum IWBH. To each his own. 

Edited by DustSierra
Posted
On 2/23/2022 at 9:50 AM, superhighsierra said:


That oughta work.

 


I’ve got 275/65/r20 which are a 34.1 inch tire, 11” wide on stock 20’s and they barely rubbed at full lock. Needed to zip tie the liners and now they don’t. 
 

295/55r22 are a 34.8” tire and 11.8” wide. You do the math. They are going to rub. But you should be able to get away with moving/heating the wheel well liners and not have to cut or do a body mount chop. I’ve seen plenty of people running 35’s on a stock suspension who claim they did nothing and they fit.

 

You should be fine but might have to break out the heat gun, modify the liners and/or mudflaps if you don’t want any rubbing. So worth it though as ~35” tires and a small lift on these trucks is the best thing you can aesthetically do to them. Too much lift = too much wheel well unless you put on 37’s which presents a whole host of other things you need to do to properly run them.


 

thanks for the input.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • If everything checks out at the MAF, then the MAF is BAD, new or not.   You don't need a signal generator to troubleshoot this. PCM needs ALL powers and ALL grounds able to light a halogen headlight bulb - if it can light the bulb bright, then the wiring is good enough to run the PCM.   Best thing you can do for yourself is spend some time here: scannerdanner.com - Check out all his YouTube videos on similar issues. If you decide to subscribe it's the best bang-for-buck ratio in the automotive world, hands-down. He's got TONS of free vids on YouTube, too.
    • Yes, I used my multimeter to probe all of the wires at the MAF, both with the sensor connected, sensor disconnected, key on engine off, key on engine running, etc etc etc. I probed all of the wires again at the PCM, at the connectors, etc. All voltages are what they should be according to the service manual/wiring diagrams. All grounds are good, less than 20 millivolts from the battery negative under load. Both at the connector of the MAF, at the PCM connector etc.      I know this throws a pretty big wrench into things, but this truck was acting up before the swap. I don't have very much information, if any on what was causing it, but if you cleared all of the dtcs it would do the same thing where it would crank, fire, then die. And it would do the same thing a dozen or so times, and eventually it would start and run, but the difference is that it would run and actually be drivable. Whereas now if you can drive it at all, it goes into reduced power mode almost immediately, and even then it's not running correctly. When you come to a stop at a light it stumbles down to for 500 RPM before catching itself and returning to the smooth idle. And if you go more than about 50% throttle then it immediately goes back to doing the misfire thing.    Like I said, I know that throws a wrench into things, and unfortunately I was not able to pull any data or anything like that before I did this work, so I don't have much to go on.    I'm trying to not fixate on one particular thing as the cause of the problem, but it seems like all avenues are pointing me towards the PCM. Like I said I have tested the wiring extensively (see above), and during cranking the sensor does produce seemingly legitimate values at least according to my multimeter, but as soon as the engine fires those values quickly descend into gibberish. I've tried it with multiple different known working sensors, I have done literally every test I can think of multiple times on the wiring (probing the signals, probing the pins with the sensors unplugged, probing the pins at the PCM, voltage drop, voltage drop under load, continuity, ohms, and double-checking everything against the wiring diagrams/ proper values in the service data.)    Another thing that pushes me towards a possible PCM failure is, I have noticed in troubleshooting a little bit taking a break and coming back, that when I leave the truck to sit for a while and cool off, it starts and runs smoothly when I first start it up. However once it warms up. It starts having problems. For example, when I went out to the truck this morning after it had been sitting overnight, I was actually able to drive it down the block. And then once I got on the throttle a Little bit after going about a thousand ft, it started misfiring again. I pulled it back into the driveway, shut it down, and started it back up. It idled smoothly. As soon as I touched the throttle it did the misfire thing again. From then on as soon as I started it it would misfire. I shut the truck off and went to go get a coffee and do a bit more research. When I came back out I started the truck up and it immediately went into the smooth idle. After a couple of minutes of playing around with it, it would not idle smoothly anymore. Let it sit a couple of hours, rinse and repeat. This makes me think with temperature change something is going wrong inside the PCM. I have the PCM out of the 2007 donor vehicle and I'm thinking of getting a one-day subscription to the ACDelco programming service to try and program that and see if it helps.   Like I said, I'm really trying to not fixate myself on one potential cause, but it seems everything is pointing me towards PCM failure. I would really like to try to confirm that, but unfortunately I don't have an oscilloscope or a signal generator to do the GM service procedure where you feed 5 khz into the signal pin. 
    • Ahh, sorry about that - I got some bad info. Newdude is correct. That's what I get for working 13 hours straight ... on my "vacation", lol.   Should've checked the files I had instead of the internet.   Anyway ... this is GREAT news, since this would've been an absolute friggin nightmare to get working.   I don't think the lack of VVT is causing this - you've got another issue. Wiring, I'm betting.   I'm telling you right now, your computer isn't bad. If it worked before the swap, it's working now. You need to do some more (better) diagnostics and figure out exactly what you're missing. Did you test every wire directly at the MAF? Have 5V reference? Ground? If you're reading ZERO g/s, your Hz isn't much use - it's going to be the wrong value anyway. The MAF is not working, and you need to find out WHY.   I got this off the net, so VERIFY first: Pin A: Black (BLK) wire, Circuit 552, serves as the Sensor Return (Ground).  Pin B: Tan (TAN) wire, Circuit 472, carries the Intake Air Temperature (IAT) signal.  Pin C: Yellow (YEL) wire, Circuit 492, is the primary MAF Sensor Signal output to the PCM. Pin D: Pink (PNK) wire, Circuit 339 or 539, provides Ignition 1 Voltage (Power).  Pin E: Tan/Black wire, Circuit 552 or similar, often associated with the Intake Air Temperature ground or signal return.  Global-A list: https://postimg.cc/KKJnQC85    
    • Correct....the end user can't reach to Realtruck directly like they can if they purchase a Bak, Undercover, etc...  It has to go through a dealer.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...