Jump to content

Alignment after Leveling

Black and Blue Z71
 Share

Recommended Posts

Black and Blue Z71 Enthusiast

Black and Blue Z71

Posted
Posted

Hey all, recently put Pro Comps 1.5 leveling kit on my 2020 Silverado 1500 z71. Got it aligned after and the shop said my caster was almost maxed out from the factory and were only able to make some adjustments. I put the print out below. Is this normal or cause for concern? Appreciate any insight.91821.thumb.jpeg.2130a3665969564b8ef32d8a3845c7a2.jpeg

  • Thanks 1
winks79 Enthusiast

winks79

Posted
Posted

I have a 2019 Sierra SLT 4wd that I put Bilstein 5100's on and leveled at 1.5 inch. When I had mine realigned was nothing like that. Guy had to do very little and everything was put back to normal. Have not had any issues. If that is the specs after an alignment something is bad wrong. I would have someone else check.

Black and Blue Z71 Enthusiast

Black and Blue Z71

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Interesting to hear that minimal adjustments were needed on your truck compared to mine. Those are the specs after the alignment was done. Truck tracks straight and drives normal. Definitely thinking I should go to another shop and have them take a look.

rbdjr Enthusiast

rbdjr

Posted
Posted

For me those readings would be perfectly fine as long as truck tracks straight and handles ok down the road, cross caster is a bit higher than I like to set, I prefer 1/2deg more on RS than left to fight road crown on most secondary roads( yours currently 1 deg) , but if it tracks straight and handling ok leave it alone, Caster has no effect on tire wear, so those are good if good for you. Camber and Toe looks fine. Keep a close look on tires and rotate tires every oil change its worth it in the end. 

 I also installed a level kit in my 2021 RST4x4 3.0L 4door,short bed. I installed top spacers in front and 1" spacer in rear. redid alignment , I did notice you must really torque lower control arm eccentrics to spec and they do tend to slip when hitting large bumps/potholes especialy if you sprayed with penatraint before adjusting( lesson learned myself) I did have plenty adjustment as they are very adjustable if needed, Caster/Camber and Toe. Some times you must start from scratch and create a new starting  point with eccentrics,  and not try to just to adjust from where they set from factory.

Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted

Why would anyone tell anyone else that a spec out of spec it okay?

😡

 

Needs MOOG extended caster bolts installed and your alignment man replaced. 

:idiot:

 

 

LEFT side IF different not more than 1/4 degree MORE positive caster. Equal is fine. 

LEFT side 1/4 degree MORE positive camber which when you decide to run negative camber is less negative left. 

.04 to .05 POSITIVE toe is great and there is no reason other than laziness for it to not be dead on identical. It is literally the easiest of the specs to hit. 

 

Trust angle as close to zero as possible. Steer ahead zero. 

 

This alignment was good for 125K miles on factory 60K tires when rotated, balanced and inflated routinely. 

 

HUGE caster angles make the ride harsh and adds stress to the power steering. Makes it heavy and turn in lazy. Corner like a snow plow. 

 

 

 

AlignmentSilveradoAfter.thumb.jpg.aff58cc4e7a400382ae677338215973a.jpg 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted (edited)

I'd try another shop or have them redo it.  Did they give you a "before" and "after" printout?  

 

"Technically" they used the wrong specs and your caster was probably fine to begin with.  Look at the top of their screen it says "Silverado 1500 4x4 dblcab +Z7X".  RPO code Z7X is Trail Boss suspension, and you didn't install the GM Trail Boss kit, so those specs should NOT have been used during the alignment.  

 

They should have aligned it as "-Z7X (minus Z7X)".  

 

I cut the chart down just to double cab 4x4 with and without Trail Boss so you can see the difference in GM's specs:

 

aligin.thumb.png.a44f543d5207be7f6dfc0b9ccafac811.png

 

Edited by newdude
SilveradoRST Enthusiast

SilveradoRST

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, newdude said:

I'd try another shop or have them redo it.  Did they give you a "before" and "after" printout?  

 

"Technically" they used the wrong specs and your caster was probably fine to begin with.  Look at the top of their screen it says "Silverado 1500 4x4 dblcab +Z7X".  RPO code Z7X is Trail Boss suspension, and you didn't install the GM Trail Boss kit, so those specs should NOT have been used during the alignment.  

 

They should have aligned it as "-Z7X (minus Z7X)".  

 

I cut the chart down just to double cab 4x4 with and without Trail Boss so you can see the difference in GM's specs:

 

aligin.thumb.png.a44f543d5207be7f6dfc0b9ccafac811.png

 

 

Sorry to hi-jack but this got me thinking.  I had the GM Trail Boss Accessory Suspension installed back in Feb '21.  So the dealer (further away from me) did the lift and alignment.  They also did the power steering controller calibration as stated in the instructions.  Fast forward months later, I felt my steering wheel was off-center.  Constantly had to hold the wheel slightly left to track straight.  

 

I went to my local dealership and had them do an alignment again, they said the toe was off a bit.  The wheel is centered now but I get a bit of wandering, not terrible.  I did mention to my local dealership I had the Gm 2" lift done at another dealer when I went in for the alignment.   Is this something they would have know by looking up the VIN?  Because an authorization code, VIN and a call to Techline was needed to do the power steering controller (per Lift Kit Instructions), is my VIN in the GM system now reflect that I have the 2" lift?   Or am I completely wrong, VIN will show I have an RST and I'll have to always remind the dealer to use +Z7X when getting an alignment done?  

c.schill Enthusiast

c.schill

Posted
Posted

I just put 2.5" leveling struts on the front of my 2019 LT, and the alignment went fine. They were able to get everything perfectly in spec. Seems odd to me that with a lesser height spacer, they had that much trouble getting everything in spec. 

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Black and Blue Z71 said:

Great info and good catch on the trail boss specs. Yes they provided the before specs, I put them below. I scheduled an appointment for at a local dealership on Monday to have them look at it. Definitely not ideal....

Screenshot_20220310-104411_Chrome.jpg

 

 

Yea, see your before caster is much more in line with the non Trail Boss alignment specs, perhaps even in the green if they had loaded in with the correct specs to start with.  It should have been a toe and go more likely, or possibly a quick caster tweak followed by a toe adjust.  

Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, newdude said:

I'd try another shop or have them redo it.  Did they give you a "before" and "after" printout?  

 

"Technically" they used the wrong specs and your caster was probably fine to begin with.  Look at the top of their screen it says "Silverado 1500 4x4 dblcab +Z7X".  RPO code Z7X is Trail Boss suspension, and you didn't install the GM Trail Boss kit, so those specs should NOT have been used during the alignment.  

 

They should have aligned it as "-Z7X (minus Z7X)".  

 

I cut the chart down just to double cab 4x4 with and without Trail Boss so you can see the difference in GM's specs:

 

aligin.thumb.png.a44f543d5207be7f6dfc0b9ccafac811.png

 

 

I'm going ask a question before I step in IT. Does this lift change the frame rake angle? Ever measure it?

 

I ask because when I did my lower via the back end it of course changed the frame rake when also changes the caster angle by the EXACT same amount. These numbers in this chart reflect the exact change in frame rake which means the 'ideal' caster angle is "Ideal' for GM in that changing the spec means no alignment required. 

 

IF that sounds absurd I direct you to the TSB on the 2.4 ring and piston replacement that states that even at the 150K warranty limit to NOT hone the cylinders. 

 

Or to the GM memo on further reducing of the OCI beyond the 2014 OLM recalibration to 7.5K. 

Recalibration of the ABS to 'Band-Aid" a brake vacuum pump. No need to go on, eh? 

 

Point is there is nothing in a lift or lower that would change the 'ideal' caster value Think about it. They have a habit of moving a spec instead of doing the work. IMHO of course. 

 

The recalibration of the power steering adjust the 'assist' to reflect the higher input effort required to overcome an extra degree of two of caster. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • bluemonstercali
      wipers come on randomly

      By bluemonstercali · Posted

      I am experiecing the same issue, I have gone in the setting and disabled rain sensing function but I am still experiencing this. Whe i use my turn signal they will redomly turn on. Sometime they stay on and others times we swipe 2 or 3 times and stop. Its super anoying, escpecially after a fresh wash. Anyone have any advice? . rain-sensing function, but I am still experiencing this issue Sometimes they stay on, and other times we swipe 2 or 3 times and stop.It's super annoying, especially after a fresh wash.When I use my turn signal, they will randomly turn on. I am experiencing the same issue. I have gone into the settings and disabled the rain sensing function, but I am still experiencing this.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Gas Prices

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      If we actually used any significant amount of that source in the USA then I'd agree but we don't. We've had that discussion before. We drill and pump more than we use. Thing is, we sell. We export. Gas and Crude. It's more profitable so any shortage here is self inflicted and LEGAL.    I worked a gas plant that has multiple fuel sources available and I worked in the furnace and boiler plant in that facility. I'd had days we swapped fuel types four times in a twelve hour shift which isn't done on supply but on margin. Two of the fuel sources are internally generated. Tail gas and DAK, both of which are sold as well a consumed. We always had more than we needed to run the process but we chose the fuel that produced the best margin not bought at the cheapest price always. A good bit of math to that and back in the time that was done on a slide rule.     I worked the Shale Oil Semiworks of Chevron Research and CONOCO Research in Salt Lake City. That process never went into production although it was very successful. Why? Did we lack oil bearing shale? Nope. Price of crude never made the margins work. That was in the late 70's early 80's. Remember history? What was happening then was a reaction to that situation. It didn't drive it. If so then it's easy. This isn't a supply and demand thing. This is a profit and margin thing and AI rules that now.    In no refining situation that I was ever in would a bomb hitting a well anywhere in the world 'instantly' interrupt or even distress the supply. Most plants have more than a months worth of crude in the tank field and more in pumping stations. That yo-yo could play out over days, weeks and maybe months and have zero impact on plant operations. How many times has this been off and on in the last few months? These people and not stupid. These plants measure down time in hundreds of thousands of dollars per day. They are not sucking fumes or waiting on the next truckload with baited breath. Besides, as I noted, they are for the most part 'vertically integrated'. They own it from the dirt is sits in to the delivery rack and sometimes to the pump. It has a HUGE shock absorber built in. When production suffers, refining wins and when refining is winning exploration is killing. The rest of that crap in the news is a 'news cycle'. Government dipping in to reserves? Oil is stealing their milk money. There's a reason Chevron abandon Venezuela infrastructure and it had nothing to do with security of US citizens. Nationals run those plants. it has to do with MARGINS disappearing to corruption. They are in no hurry to return. Is there supply there? Oh yea. More than enough to offset what is bought in the middle east. Just isn't ???? Profitable.    We have supply. There are places in Illinois you can drive a pipe into the ground and run your homes natural gas furnace on it.    A refinery fire will gum up the supply works but not a localized war where the market is using a limited supply from. Now Europe, that's something other....
    • CamGTP
      Gas Prices

      By CamGTP · Posted

      $4.00 a gallon here now.   Diesel nearly $5.00 again.
    • Atlas
      Gas Prices

      By Atlas · Posted

      If we're talking futures, yes, it's speculation.   The spot price of a delivered barrel is elevated now compared to before the conflict. And that is related more to current supply/demand.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Gas Prices

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      SPECULATION on the wars effect raised prices. AI is maximizing the profit. Refining is vertically integrated. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...