Jump to content

Alignment after Leveling

Black and Blue Z71
 Share

Recommended Posts

Black and Blue Z71 Enthusiast

Black and Blue Z71

Posted
Posted

Hey all, recently put Pro Comps 1.5 leveling kit on my 2020 Silverado 1500 z71. Got it aligned after and the shop said my caster was almost maxed out from the factory and were only able to make some adjustments. I put the print out below. Is this normal or cause for concern? Appreciate any insight.91821.thumb.jpeg.2130a3665969564b8ef32d8a3845c7a2.jpeg

  • Thanks 1
winks79 Enthusiast

winks79

Posted
Posted

I have a 2019 Sierra SLT 4wd that I put Bilstein 5100's on and leveled at 1.5 inch. When I had mine realigned was nothing like that. Guy had to do very little and everything was put back to normal. Have not had any issues. If that is the specs after an alignment something is bad wrong. I would have someone else check.

Black and Blue Z71 Enthusiast

Black and Blue Z71

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Interesting to hear that minimal adjustments were needed on your truck compared to mine. Those are the specs after the alignment was done. Truck tracks straight and drives normal. Definitely thinking I should go to another shop and have them take a look.

rbdjr Enthusiast

rbdjr

Posted
Posted

For me those readings would be perfectly fine as long as truck tracks straight and handles ok down the road, cross caster is a bit higher than I like to set, I prefer 1/2deg more on RS than left to fight road crown on most secondary roads( yours currently 1 deg) , but if it tracks straight and handling ok leave it alone, Caster has no effect on tire wear, so those are good if good for you. Camber and Toe looks fine. Keep a close look on tires and rotate tires every oil change its worth it in the end. 

 I also installed a level kit in my 2021 RST4x4 3.0L 4door,short bed. I installed top spacers in front and 1" spacer in rear. redid alignment , I did notice you must really torque lower control arm eccentrics to spec and they do tend to slip when hitting large bumps/potholes especialy if you sprayed with penatraint before adjusting( lesson learned myself) I did have plenty adjustment as they are very adjustable if needed, Caster/Camber and Toe. Some times you must start from scratch and create a new starting  point with eccentrics,  and not try to just to adjust from where they set from factory.

Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted

Why would anyone tell anyone else that a spec out of spec it okay?

😡

 

Needs MOOG extended caster bolts installed and your alignment man replaced. 

:idiot:

 

 

LEFT side IF different not more than 1/4 degree MORE positive caster. Equal is fine. 

LEFT side 1/4 degree MORE positive camber which when you decide to run negative camber is less negative left. 

.04 to .05 POSITIVE toe is great and there is no reason other than laziness for it to not be dead on identical. It is literally the easiest of the specs to hit. 

 

Trust angle as close to zero as possible. Steer ahead zero. 

 

This alignment was good for 125K miles on factory 60K tires when rotated, balanced and inflated routinely. 

 

HUGE caster angles make the ride harsh and adds stress to the power steering. Makes it heavy and turn in lazy. Corner like a snow plow. 

 

 

 

AlignmentSilveradoAfter.thumb.jpg.aff58cc4e7a400382ae677338215973a.jpg 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted (edited)

I'd try another shop or have them redo it.  Did they give you a "before" and "after" printout?  

 

"Technically" they used the wrong specs and your caster was probably fine to begin with.  Look at the top of their screen it says "Silverado 1500 4x4 dblcab +Z7X".  RPO code Z7X is Trail Boss suspension, and you didn't install the GM Trail Boss kit, so those specs should NOT have been used during the alignment.  

 

They should have aligned it as "-Z7X (minus Z7X)".  

 

I cut the chart down just to double cab 4x4 with and without Trail Boss so you can see the difference in GM's specs:

 

aligin.thumb.png.a44f543d5207be7f6dfc0b9ccafac811.png

 

Edited by newdude
SilveradoRST Enthusiast

SilveradoRST

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, newdude said:

I'd try another shop or have them redo it.  Did they give you a "before" and "after" printout?  

 

"Technically" they used the wrong specs and your caster was probably fine to begin with.  Look at the top of their screen it says "Silverado 1500 4x4 dblcab +Z7X".  RPO code Z7X is Trail Boss suspension, and you didn't install the GM Trail Boss kit, so those specs should NOT have been used during the alignment.  

 

They should have aligned it as "-Z7X (minus Z7X)".  

 

I cut the chart down just to double cab 4x4 with and without Trail Boss so you can see the difference in GM's specs:

 

aligin.thumb.png.a44f543d5207be7f6dfc0b9ccafac811.png

 

 

Sorry to hi-jack but this got me thinking.  I had the GM Trail Boss Accessory Suspension installed back in Feb '21.  So the dealer (further away from me) did the lift and alignment.  They also did the power steering controller calibration as stated in the instructions.  Fast forward months later, I felt my steering wheel was off-center.  Constantly had to hold the wheel slightly left to track straight.  

 

I went to my local dealership and had them do an alignment again, they said the toe was off a bit.  The wheel is centered now but I get a bit of wandering, not terrible.  I did mention to my local dealership I had the Gm 2" lift done at another dealer when I went in for the alignment.   Is this something they would have know by looking up the VIN?  Because an authorization code, VIN and a call to Techline was needed to do the power steering controller (per Lift Kit Instructions), is my VIN in the GM system now reflect that I have the 2" lift?   Or am I completely wrong, VIN will show I have an RST and I'll have to always remind the dealer to use +Z7X when getting an alignment done?  

c.schill Enthusiast

c.schill

Posted
Posted

I just put 2.5" leveling struts on the front of my 2019 LT, and the alignment went fine. They were able to get everything perfectly in spec. Seems odd to me that with a lesser height spacer, they had that much trouble getting everything in spec. 

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Black and Blue Z71 said:

Great info and good catch on the trail boss specs. Yes they provided the before specs, I put them below. I scheduled an appointment for at a local dealership on Monday to have them look at it. Definitely not ideal....

Screenshot_20220310-104411_Chrome.jpg

 

 

Yea, see your before caster is much more in line with the non Trail Boss alignment specs, perhaps even in the green if they had loaded in with the correct specs to start with.  It should have been a toe and go more likely, or possibly a quick caster tweak followed by a toe adjust.  

Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, newdude said:

I'd try another shop or have them redo it.  Did they give you a "before" and "after" printout?  

 

"Technically" they used the wrong specs and your caster was probably fine to begin with.  Look at the top of their screen it says "Silverado 1500 4x4 dblcab +Z7X".  RPO code Z7X is Trail Boss suspension, and you didn't install the GM Trail Boss kit, so those specs should NOT have been used during the alignment.  

 

They should have aligned it as "-Z7X (minus Z7X)".  

 

I cut the chart down just to double cab 4x4 with and without Trail Boss so you can see the difference in GM's specs:

 

aligin.thumb.png.a44f543d5207be7f6dfc0b9ccafac811.png

 

 

I'm going ask a question before I step in IT. Does this lift change the frame rake angle? Ever measure it?

 

I ask because when I did my lower via the back end it of course changed the frame rake when also changes the caster angle by the EXACT same amount. These numbers in this chart reflect the exact change in frame rake which means the 'ideal' caster angle is "Ideal' for GM in that changing the spec means no alignment required. 

 

IF that sounds absurd I direct you to the TSB on the 2.4 ring and piston replacement that states that even at the 150K warranty limit to NOT hone the cylinders. 

 

Or to the GM memo on further reducing of the OCI beyond the 2014 OLM recalibration to 7.5K. 

Recalibration of the ABS to 'Band-Aid" a brake vacuum pump. No need to go on, eh? 

 

Point is there is nothing in a lift or lower that would change the 'ideal' caster value Think about it. They have a habit of moving a spec instead of doing the work. IMHO of course. 

 

The recalibration of the power steering adjust the 'assist' to reflect the higher input effort required to overcome an extra degree of two of caster. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,942
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    tblt44
    Newest Member
    tblt44
    Joined

  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 613 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • C/K Man
      Silverado 4500-5500-6500 are they still being produced? Would have sold better as GMCs as well

      By C/K Man · Posted

      There was talk over the last couple of years that the contract to build these trucks between GM and International would not be renewed.  International moved production of all their other trucks besides the companion CV model out of the Springfield plant some time ago when they opened their San Antonio plant.  That left Springfield only building the Silverado Medium Duty, International CV Series, and some Express/Savanna long wheelbase cutaways.  International also put the plant up for sale some time ago.  This all answered my earlier question as to why GM and International did nothing with these trucks since they were introduced, as they had basically become a market 'placeholder' with a finite life.    The Silverado Medium Duty/International CV trucks were interesting combination of a GM powertrain, electrical system, and K2XX Silverado cab with an International chassis that was supposedly designed for a step-van type vehicle they never produced.  They were manufactured in International's Springfield plant along with the IH MV series initially.  When first introduced, there was much talk that the Silverado Medium Duty/CV would eventually get a gasoline engine option along with other upgrades and GM and IH would work on a class 6/7 joint venture truck.  This was before VW bought Navistar out, after that happened no more was said.  Draw your own conclusions...   About the time talk started that the GM/IH joint venture was not going to be renewed, rumors started that GM would develop a new line of medium duty trucks themselves.  The story is the new trucks will be part of the next generation HD's due in 2028, and will still feature a 'straight rail' chassis design that the current medium duty has.  GM views this as a desirable feature that differentiates their truck from the competition.  A gasoline engine option is also expected.  As the current Silverado Medium Duty remains in production until September 2026 and there is still a lot of inventory available do not expect any official word for some time.   I believe GM remains committed to their successful partnership with Isuzu, and all the LCF models will still be available from Chevy Commercial dealers.  Isuzu is on the cusp of opening a new large plant in South Carolina and there is also speculation that this may result in new product for both Isuzu and Chevy Commercial dealers.                  
    • davester
      push to talk button

      By davester · Posted

      drive the truck back to the dealer and complain that the button works.
    • davester
      push to talk button

      By davester · Posted

      drive the truck back to the dealer and complain that the button works.
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      I have a 2026 2500 HD Ultimate. My phone app says there’s a software update available. It’s something about improved battery management and something to do with the running boards. I follow the instructions for the update but the “Check for Updates” option is greyed out in my settings menu. Has anyone else seen this? How did you resolve it? The help message just says “see your dealer” if the download doesn’t work. I’m just trying to save a trip. 
    • newdude
      Exhaust Question

      By newdude · Posted

      Fuel mileage?  That's all how you use your right foot.  Exhaust will give you sound.   Stock exhaust 5.3 is 2.75" diameter piping.     If the truck is nice and worth putting some $$ into it, I'd go for a Corsa catback.  I had one on my 2019 old body 5.3 and it was just perfect.  Zero drone, just driving around and cruising on the highway you'd think it was stock, but when you opened it up it was like a Camaro with the factory dual mode.  Corsa bumps their catback to 3in diameter.  

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...