Jump to content

Towing

Chevy Mike
 Share

Recommended Posts

Chevy Mike New Member

Chevy Mike

Posted
Posted

I just bought a 2022 Silverado 2500HD with the 6.6 gas engine. Can anybody tell me when i can start pulling my 8000 lb camper with no restrictions. Owners manual says on the 1st towing trip to not go over 50 mph. By the time we go camping we should have around 1200 miles on the truck. 50 mph is a little slow considering speed limit is 65 mph on way down to the shore. I dont want to cause an accident. Thank you, Mike W.

Thankful Enthusiast

Thankful

Posted
Posted

I don't know what your manual says, but that's where I'd go to find out.  Years ago, the standard break in mileage was 500 miles before you towed.

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
56 minutes ago, Chevy Mike said:

I just bought a 2022 Silverado 2500HD with the 6.6 gas engine. Can anybody tell me when i can start pulling my 8000 lb camper with no restrictions. Owners manual says on the 1st towing trip to not go over 50 mph. By the time we go camping we should have around 1200 miles on the truck. 50 mph is a little slow considering speed limit is 65 mph on way down to the shore. I dont want to cause an accident. Thank you, Mike W.

 

 

Heat.  Diffs produce lots of heat during the first 500mi of break in.  They also will produce lots of heat during initial towing.  I'd get the trailer hooked up after you put 500mi on it to get it "broke in" with a trailer, and then before you do your camping trip change the oil as it also says.  

ShotgunZ71 Senior Enthusiast

ShotgunZ71

Posted
Posted

When my 2020 was new, it sure had a pile of various driving before the first tow. That happened between 500-1000 miles. Towed like normal, normal speeds, etc. Trucked performed great pulling a 42' 15000lb fifth wheel on that trip and multiple others.

Another JR Senior Enthusiast

Another JR

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, newdude said:

 

 

Heat.  Diffs produce lots of heat during the first 500mi of break in.  They also will produce lots of heat during initial towing.  I'd get the trailer hooked up after you put 500mi on it to get it "broke in" with a trailer, and then before you do your camping trip change the oil as it also says.  


There’s a good reason the manual recommends not towing in the break in period, and it is primarily related to the differential. Heat is part of it but really a by-product of the break in process. However, it also aggravates the conditions during break in by thinning the oil.  


When the differential ring and pinion are new, the gear tooth contact area is very small, creating very high contact pressure. This causes oil film breakdown and surface wear, which eventually wears in the contact point, spreading the tooth contact pressure and reducing the local surface stress. If the differential is highly loaded before this wearing in has been allowed to slowly occur, the high local contact stress can cause spalling of the tooth surfaces at the contact point.
 

If spalling occurs, best case it will cause a noisy differential with reduced life, and worst case it can cause tooth failure due to the created stress concentrations. 
 

instead, you want to run the differential lightly loaded until the gear contact patches have worn in to some extent, spreading out the force and reducing the contact pressure. Once this has occurred to some extent, the gear teeth can withstand the higher load assocIated with towing. GM has recommended a particular minimum number of miles for this. More is better. 

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
the wanderer Enthusiast

the wanderer

Posted
Posted

No doubt you should follow GM's recommendations. But note that there is not a single guy who uses these trucks for work (landscapers etc) who give a seconds thought to "break in". They buy it off the lot one day and it's working hard the next day.

Another JR Senior Enthusiast

Another JR

Posted
Posted

Agreed. I was just explaining why you don’t want to do that and why you probably don’t want to buy a used truck from someone like that. If they weren’t pulling heavy weights up long climbs, and not applying max torque (like pulling a big boat out of the water) it probably is just fine.  There is a legitimate physical reason to break it in, though. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      Thanks - I wasn't quite caffeinated this morning. 2:1 makes sense, turning the crankshaft 360 degrees will turn the cam 180 degrees, and had I done that, the cam's dot would be at 6 and the crank's at 12 again.   I went ahead and took the sprocket off anyway, aligned everything dot-to-dot including the balance shaft just for s&g. I'm glad I did because I discovered no Loctite on the timing sprocket bolts. Maybe it's not required, but at only 20 ft-lb torque spec, those bolts aren't in there very tight. Cleaned and reassembled with some thread locker and torqued.   A general observation: Less is more with RTV. If a little doesn't stop a leak, a LOT probably won't, either. RTV is thinly veiled revenge, in a tube...      
    • richard wysong
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By richard wysong · Posted

      The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • Grumpy Bear
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • Tyler Gibbs
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Tyler Gibbs · Posted

      It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...