Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

'22 Sierra 2500HD, 6.6L gas.

 

Was driving along a rural road today, through rolling hills. Up and downhills of fairly short distances. Can't relate the exact incline but nothing too serious. Speed limit at 60 kmh (not mph), and decided to use Cruise Control. so set it at 63. Did as expected on flat sections but on the first downhill, the speed reached 82, before I pressed the brake. The truck had downshifted and RPMs up to 3500 - 4000, before I applied brake, so it appears it was responding to the speed, but I was not prepared to see how far this would go.

 

I have driven previous truck (Sierra 1500, 6.2L gas) many times along same stretch and also used CC at same speed,  and it never went above 70-ish maximum before it slowed itself down, which was why I was quite surprised on this occasion.

 

CC works fine on level terrain or slight inclines. I recognize CC will not keep speed right on set speed and will vary, depending on steepness of incline, but is at least 19 over the set speed a bit excessive?

 

Marv

Posted

That surprises me. I have a 2020 2500HD with the 6.6 gas. I sometimes pull a trailer with a skid steer on it (probably around 10K lbs total). I have been amazed how well it handles going down a large hill by my place in cruise. Downshifts, I don't think it has ever sped up over 5 MPH. Never hit the brake. Actually, does better on that hill than my car does.

  • Like 1
Posted

I've noticed cruise control works better for controlling speed in Tow Haul mode.  The down side is Tow/Haul mode is more aggressive with shifts up and down.  At least that is the way it seems to work on my truck. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Regular cruise control can only do so much going downhill over speed is possible. Adaptive cruise or hill descent control uses brakes and can maintain speed going downhill. If increased speed is a problem going downhill then you probably have regular cruise control. When I was pulling loads I usually would engage the trailer brakes to save on overheating the truck brakes. 

Posted

Yes, I have regular Cruise Control, not Adaptive or HDC. However, as initially noted, I have driven the same route a number of times in previous truck (also no HDC or Adaptive) and CC has always worked as I expected. Just seemed weird this time and for a second I actually thought CC had somehow deactivated itself. But the higher rpms then seemed to indicate otherwise. One would think, especially for an HD, that if reasonably gentle foot braking can slow the truck that CC would be able to do same.

Posted (edited)

When I’m in CC not in Tow Haul Mod, I’ve had a nice experience of controlled speed when I was in a low gear before the descent. You got me thinkin… maybe I should try some experimentn’ with tricking her into a lower gear before the descent.

Edited by NaturallyAspirated
Posted
On 1/13/2023 at 1:08 AM, marpel said:

Yes, I have regular Cruise Control, not Adaptive or HDC. However, as initially noted, I have driven the same route a number of times in previous truck (also no HDC or Adaptive) and CC has always worked as I expected. Just seemed weird this time and for a second I actually thought CC had somehow deactivated itself. But the higher rpms then seemed to indicate otherwise. One would think, especially for an HD, that if reasonably gentle foot braking can slow the truck that CC would be able to do same.

That is kind of odd.  Loaded or unloaded with the cruise set I've never experienced more then 4mph difference up and down hills.  The trans will downshift going down steep hills enough to keep it within range we will say.  So I have no idea why yours is that excessive.  That would definitely concern me too but I can't think of any reason that would be happening....very odd.

Posted

Seemed odd to me too. And I forgot to initially mention, this was with no load.

 

I have driven my prior truck to/from Vancouver, B.C. and Denver, Co. multiple times (also unloaded), mainly along the Interstates, with CC on for much of the drive and even on the steepest descents I don't recall it ever getting anywhere near this far over the set speed. Having said that, although it was the 6.2L with tow package, it was lighter than the new one.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, marpel said:

Seemed odd to me too. And I forgot to initially mention, this was with no load.

 

I have driven my prior truck to/from Vancouver, B.C. and Denver, Co. multiple times (also unloaded), mainly along the Interstates, with CC on for much of the drive and even on the steepest descents I don't recall it ever getting anywhere near this far over the set speed. Having said that, although it was the 6.2L with tow package, it was lighter than the new one.

With no load makes this even odder.  I wish I had an answer for you, but I can't imagine it being normal.  What the fix is for it, I honestly have no idea.  I hope you report back if you find one in the event others might have the same problem.  I think most will agree that's not normal what you are experiencing.  But I'm racking my brain trying to think of why?  It makes no sense and is certainly not how my truck reacts with or without loads with the CC set.  Have you had the codes read?  Do you have a check engine light on?  All I can think of is not just one but two bad wheel speed sensors.  I'm probably way off but there is something that's not reading right to the ECU.

Edited by Jettech1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I noticed a similar issue with my truck. I was going down a 7% grade for 10 miles with CC on and I had to keep tapping the brakes to keep the truck from going 5+ mph over the set CC speed. The truck was empty and I wasn't towing anything.

 

I tried using the manual shift button but I think I need to shift to "L" to use it. The truck was brand new at the time and I'm still learning it. My previous vehicles would downshift automatically so this was new to me.

 

Next time I'll try turning on tow mode to see if that helps. 5+ mph over the CC set speed seems excessive to me.

Posted

For those who didn't happen to read another post, in which I added an update about this thread as well, I visited the dealer the other day, for another matter, and asked a senior service rep about the Cruise Control and described my previous experience. He advised CC is not really intended to slow down a vehicle, but to accelerate up to the set speed and "maintain" it in that general area. I didn't really understand that, and as he gave me some questionable info on another topic, I left it there.

 

Anyway, as has been my intention, I had a chance to drive the same route I initially posted about, and set the CC to the same speed (63kmh in a 60 zone). I was prepared to just let the CC handle the up/down hills and not manually press the brake, just to see what it would do.

 

On some in/declines, it was like the truck was a bit schizophrenic. I can only describe the management of the set speed as "clunky". The transition was not smooth and not even close to my prior truck.

 

On the exact decline as in the first post, I just let it do it's thing and by the time it reached the bottom (fairly short hill as well), it had reached 85kmh. It then downshifted and hit 3000 rpm and slowed, although by that time, it was at the bottom of the hill anyway. Not sure what it would have accomplished (or not) had the decline been longer in distance.

 

On relatively flat grade, the CC acted as I expected it should.

 

Not really that impressed, though, especially for an HD.

 

Marv

Posted
12 minutes ago, marpel said:

For those who didn't happen to read another post, in which I added an update about this thread as well, I visited the dealer the other day, for another matter, and asked a senior service rep about the Cruise Control and described my previous experience. He advised CC is not really intended to slow down a vehicle, but to accelerate up to the set speed and "maintain" it in that general area. I didn't really understand that, and as he gave me some questionable info on another topic, I left it there.

 

Anyway, as has been my intention, I had a chance to drive the same route I initially posted about, and set the CC to the same speed (63kmh in a 60 zone). I was prepared to just let the CC handle the up/down hills and not manually press the brake, just to see what it would do.

 

On some in/declines, it was like the truck was a bit schizophrenic. I can only describe the management of the set speed as "clunky". The transition was not smooth and not even close to my prior truck.

 

On the exact decline as in the first post, I just let it do it's thing and by the time it reached the bottom (fairly short hill as well), it had reached 85kmh. It then downshifted and hit 3000 rpm and slowed, although by that time, it was at the bottom of the hill anyway. Not sure what it would have accomplished (or not) had the decline been longer in distance.

 

On relatively flat grade, the CC acted as I expected it should.

 

Not really that impressed, though, especially for an HD.

 

Marv

There is something wrong, what it is I wish I knew.  But that is not how my truck reacts when in CC.  There is definitely something wrong, I wish I could help.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,791
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    d.lowrey
    Newest Member
    d.lowrey
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 4,169 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Just did an injector/HPFP replacement on Pepper at 192,400 miles; close enough to 200K, RIGHT? (If 200K is considered life end and to me it isn't). But hey, to each his own.    Have never run a catch can on this vehicle. Back side of every valve looked like a new valve spray painted semigloss black. Port walls looked 'neat' (all a normal result of passive EGR via VVT) Zero build up even in AFM cylinders. Just color. It uses no measurable oil and never has.    At 155,000 I put her on E-85 and a borescope of the cylinders at plug change showed very clean pistons and valve faces. The replaced injector tips looked new. (It was the pump piston seal that was leaking). Oh well, have six good backups.    Still gets 28 mpg on gas (highway average) and over 20 (highway) on alky. UOA's look good and runs as good now as it did when I bought it. Better in fact.    What improvement would a Catch Can provide this motor?     And given all this I expect that IF I installed one I'd see some water/gas/oil vapor accumulation. Byproducts of normal combustion.   Having said that, IF my motor used an appreciable amount of oil I'd consider it a useful 'crutch' until I had the situation corrected OR if bore polished, until I junked it or rebuilt it to stave off repeated plug fouling.    I'm not telling you what I THINK. But what its DONE.          
    • Love the look. I'm a SCSB lover myself.    Two items. 1.) A spacer changes scrub radius but this also changes when we use wheels of different offsets. A little isn't a big deal. 2.) Steel wheels, alloy wheels all have different thickness. Same effect on the stud and lug nut as a spacer. When hub centric the wheel isn't supported by the stud. It's supported by the hub. The stud just keeps it all together.  
    • I had a evap sol go bad a couple weeks ago. . I replaced it.  While watching live data at the time I saw I had some cylinder 1 misfires. No MIL but on live data I could see ~50 at startup and about 70 more after an hour a drive all on cyl 1.  I also noticed that the LTFT were -5% to -15% always.  And that bank 2 is always -3% richer than bank 1. Even across all driving modes, city, highway, etc it’s always 3% richer than bank 1. So I start with the misfire. Swapped coil, plug, and plug wires from 1 to 3. No follow. I got an Injector reseal kit, pulled the D/s injector rail, swapped #1 and #3 injectors, resealed them, reinstalled and retested.  The misfire followed to 3. So I ordered and replaced all 8 injectors, spark plugs, and plug wires. Also replaced the 1 time use fuel pipes under the intake manifold.  Injectors that were in the truck since new were  Part # 12668390.  I replaced them with # 12742701 Got from RockAuto. Pretty certain they’re genuine and the correct ones. I called a friend at a parts store who told me “the 12742701 were the correct superseded part # for the originals I was replacing”. So started truck after replacing all that and it’s running -15 - -30 LTFTs. I reset the fuel trims with GDS2 and drove it for a 60 miles trip each way. There have been no changes in the LTFTs.  I checked if the HPFP was leaking into the crankcase. I removed the pvc and watched the trims. No difference.  I checked the alcohol content and it was at 10%  I’m out of ideas here. Truck seems to run great. Just always rich on the fuel trims.  Anyone with any help or ideas would be greatly appreciated.  I ran an injector balance test just for the heck of it and it came back this. I’m confused.  I have gds2 and some other diag tools if anyone knows of anything I should test next.
    • Definitely needs to go back to the dealer. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...