Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I got to see and sit in two pre-production Colorados at the Philly auto show a couple of weekends ago. One was a Trail Boss and the other was an LT. This is my personal opinion and I think it was a bag of mixed results.

 

I really liked the layout of the dashboard and the rest of the interior, but I wasn’t impressed with the materials used. The materials used were pretty cheap plastics and it was a little better in the LT with some soft touch materials, but I think the plastics could have been of better quality. Of course, what main manufacturer has not cheaped out on interior materials over the last several years.

 

I’m 5’7 and found it hard to get in and out of the back. It’s a tight fit due to the size of the doors, but I found I had good head room and leg room once seated in the back. Seat material and quality was fine.

 

One thing that really impressed me was the box size. I remember looking at the previous gen crew cab Colorados and thinking to myself how tiny the beds were. This bed or box, whatever you want to call it, is much bigger and a huge improvement over the previous gen crew cab. Another cool thing is that there is a storage compartment on the inside of the tailgate. I don’t remember if there was a way to lock it with a key, but there were two small levers that kept it closed. This feature is called the Stowflex Tailgate per Chevy’s website.

 

Exterior looks wise it’s fine. What I found interesting about the LT was that it was a black truck, had a black front bumper, but had a dark gray grille. I think it would have looked much better if the grille was black too.

 

The hood was open on the Trail Boss and everything fluid wise is easy to find and reach.

 

GMC did not have any Canyons there which was disappointing.

 

Overall, there were some positives and negatives. I think there are areas that could be improved, but other aspects that have improved compared to the last gen. Hopefully these trucks turn out to be dependable and sell well.

Edited by steelerdude15
  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Just drove up to Toronto to check out the Canadian Interational Auto Show and saw 3 twins there.  A Z71, a Trail Boss and a Denali.  Wish I had some more shots of the Canyon but it had a crowd for a while. 

 

I think my biggest gripe is no physical headlight switch.  This is IMO the biggest offense of the twins.  2nd biggest gripe is power passenger seat is exclusive to GMC AT4, AT4X and Denali.  My 2016 Colorado LT with the LT lux package had a power passenger seat.  3rd biggest gripe is no availability of a factory LED headlight option on the Trail Boss.  Even if it was $895 or something, it would be a worthy option.  As for minor gripes, all the GMCs have that ZR2 style high clearance front bumper, which doesn't look good on the Denali.  

 

As for materials, I would agree with you steelerdude.  My current 2022 refresh Silverado LT, the door panels up front have a more premium feel than the Z71 Colorado I saw, especially the top of the panel (arm resting area).  

 

Gauge cluster was a bit odd as it doesn't function like the refresh Silverado one does (nor does it graphically look as good IMO).  It cycles through 4 main pages of info (gauges, radio, off road and I forgot the last one).  And if you want to alter what they show its controlled via the radio.  What I found nice in the radio that I played with in the TB was there was a LOT of data that was viewable.  G meter, off road angles, elevation, vehicle data, etc.  

 

IMG_E5197.JPG

IMG_E5198.JPG

IMG_E5199.JPG

IMG_E5202.JPG

IMG_E5210.JPG

IMG_E5212.JPG

IMG_E5213.JPG

IMG_E5242.JPG

Edited by newdude
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, mayfieldjeff said:

any idea when these are hitting the dealerships? or when one can be ordered?

 

 

If your dealer has allocation they can order.  Ordering opened some time in January?  We've got a couple Trail Boss in the order system, one I think is being built this month or April.  

 

Our guy that does ordering checked the national inventory, some have been built already but not sure if any have shipped to dealers.  

Edited by newdude
Posted

By the looks of the GMC, they are saving time and putting in LED lighting that is already failing, heading towards the "purple" hue😁

  • 3 months later...
Posted
On 3/3/2023 at 3:14 PM, JimCost2014 said:

By the looks of the GMC, they are saving time and putting in LED lighting that is already failing, heading towards the "purple" hue😁

 

On the new Canyons they're already failing? Gonna have to keep a lookout for mine. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Tacito said:

 

On the new Canyons they're already failing? Gonna have to keep a lookout for mine. 

 

 

I don't think any have yet.  He was just making a smart/funny remark is all about the LED perimeter lighting in the headlight.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monthly payment is only part of the equation. With today's prices and interest rates, I'd look at the total monthly cost: payment, insurance, registration, fuel, maintenance, and expected repairs. A vehicle that fits comfortably into your budget is usually the better choice than stretching for a higher trim. I've also kept my vehicles longer over the past few years. New cars have gotten expensive enough that driving one for 10+ years, while staying on top of maintenance, often ends up being the most cost-effective approach.
    • 10 Ford and Chevy engines proven to reach 300,000 miles   You may note a common 3K OCI on this list of gas motors. I skipped over the diesels. Dh'O. 
    • Thanks newdude!  By the time manual selection is needed, I'm probably too much of a control-freak to depend on the transmission sensing braking to activate automatic downshifting.  I would be anticipating the situation and already be manually downshifting.   This truck replaced a 2004.5 LLY diesel with the Allison 5-speed.  Putting it in T/H made noticeable differences (when the torque converter locked, upshift points, downshift behavior).  On this 2024 gasser with the 10L1000 I haven't been able to detect much, if any, difference.  Ok, I can never tell now when the torque converter locks up.  But I also don't notice differences in shifting.  For downhills, I've probably already manually downshifted by then anyway.  Since it's also more awkward (than the 2004.5) to engage/disengage I don't even bother.  Or maybe it doesn't really matter with just a 3k lb. camper in the bed?   Thanks also for the list of reasons the charging system might select various voltages.  However, what I am seeing doesn't fall into any of those categories.  It very definitely, and very consistently, rises after coasting/braking.  Maybe not immediately, but not very long after coasting/braking.  Very consistently drops voltage when no longer coasting/braking.  It might also be interacting with the camper battery charging (I might disconnect the camper and see if it changes the charging behavior).  I also need to recheck turning on headlights for when I want to force it to charge the camper.   Another JR, in June I converted the camper to LiFePO4.  Since it's not a good idea to try to charge lithiums directly using truck, I installed a Victron Orion XS DC-DC charger (which BTW is AMAZING!!).  Being cheap, I only had to buy that one item (besides the battery, of course) to do the conversion.  The camper OEM 120v battery charger (only 19 years old and works perfectly) and the truck feed the input to the DC-DC charger (not at the same time).  But I didn't want the camper charger feeding back to the truck so I kept the old separator.  I considered replacing the separator with a 30amp diode but that means more work and might add another 1/2 volt drop.  One thing that surprised me was the voltage drop over the long 10awg wire run, so I can only charge smoothly at 8 amps (because the DC-DC charger is completely configurable).  Another reason I don't want an added voltage drop with the diode.  I might also be a little lazy but all this work is being done under the sink with a small cabinet opening.    
    • apparently CA smog is (or at least was)  checking that the vehicle is using the oem and/or a ca smog approved tune, so I expect you'll fail inspection doing it.
    • yes, leaking exhaust will mess up o2 sensor readings, which in turn messes up fuel trims.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...