Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I own a 2015 Silverado (Crew Cab). 5.3L

I already had the rear shocks installed, and now I am wondering if (when they install the front struts) my front end will rise or fall... and by how much?

 

I am aware that the "default" height (ring) is set for stock height...  but will it be different than my current ride height?

 

Thanks for reading.

Matthew

DSCF8441.JPG

Edited by Matthew Normand
  • Matthew Normand changed the title to How will my ground clearance change with new installation of Bilstein 5100 Shocks/Struts?
Posted
1 hour ago, Matthew Normand said:

I own a 2015 Silverado (Crew Cab). 5.3L

I already had the rear shocks installed, and now I am wondering if (when they install the front struts) my front end will rise or fall... and by how much?

 

I am aware that the "default" height (ring) is set for stock height...  but will it be different than my current ride height?

 

Thanks for reading.

Matthew

DSCF8441.JPG

Love you color & chrome on your truck. My favorite 

Posted (edited)

I had Bilstein 5100s installed all around, as well.
I had the fronts set to 1.85" lift (no adjustment for the rear is available - I used 2" blocks and 1.5" spring lift) but I wanted it that way.
As @asilverblazer mentioned, with no adjustment, your ride height should not be affected.

Edited by MikeBMW
Posted
On 3/24/2023 at 4:46 PM, asilverblazer said:

Should not change at all.

Thanks for the reply..  I am hoping it stays the same..  🙂

Posted
20 hours ago, MikeBMW said:

I had Bilstein 5100s installed all around, as well.
I had the fronts set to 1.85" lift (no adjustment for the rear is available - I used 2" blocks and 1.5" spring lift) but I wanted it that way.
As @asilverblazer mentioned, with no adjustment, your ride height should not be affected.

Nice.  I kinda like how easy it is to get in and out of.. Thanks for the reply, and may long live your truck!  🙂 

  • Like 1
Posted
20 hours ago, MikeBMW said:

I had Bilstein 5100s installed all around, as well.
I had the fronts set to 1.85" lift (no adjustment for the rear is available - I used 2" blocks and 1.5" spring lift) but I wanted it that way.
As @asilverblazer mentioned, with no adjustment, your ride height should not be affected.

Thank You!  I appreciate the reply

  • Like 1
Posted

I put a 2" level on the front of my '18 Crew, spacer under the strut and, yes, the static ground clearance in the front center of my truck has increased by at least 2", say measured at the center of the front air dam to the ground. The suspension travel has not changed and the rear clearance has not changed under the rear diff, but from ground to running board is definitely higher (according to my dog biffing the jump up for about 2 weeks after the level was installed).

 

 If your concern is a higher step into the cab Yes, there is now a higher step into the cab than before the level. The running board moved up, to varying degrees front to rear, with the of rest of the truck in front of the rear axel.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 3/26/2023 at 12:27 PM, Rock said:

I put a 2" level on the front of my '18 Crew, spacer under the strut and, yes, the static ground clearance in the front center of my truck has increased by at least 2", say measured at the center of the front air dam to the ground. The suspension travel has not changed and the rear clearance has not changed under the rear diff, but from ground to running board is definitely higher (according to my dog biffing the jump up for about 2 weeks after the level was installed).

 

 If your concern is a higher step into the cab Yes, there is now a higher step into the cab than before the level. The running board moved up, to varying degrees front to rear, with the of rest of the truck in front of the rear axel.

 

 

OP will not have any of these issues if leaving the front Billys set at stock height.  Now if they set the ring all the way to 1.85", then there will be some slight changes like you mention though. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,778
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    daveishi
    Newest Member
    daveishi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 798 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...