Jump to content

Proper way to level AT4?

SierraStorm21
 Share

Recommended Posts

SierraStorm21 Enthusiast

SierraStorm21

Posted
Posted (edited)

2021 GMC Sierra AT4 and looking to level it the proper way. The truck came with 33's (275/60/20) and I'm looking at getting new slightly bigger tires too (34's (275/65/20's) and not sure if this would affect the way I should do it.

 

I've read through several threads talking about you should replace the UCA's in the process due to angles being outside the factory tolerance and I completely understand that and willing to spend the extra $ to do it right.

 

Reading through various reviews of the numerous kits out there, I think I've settled on the Rough Country one that includes the UCA's. I've never lifted or leveled a truck before, so I'm new to this and want to make sure I'm getting it right. So if you have experience or wisdom in this arena, feel free to chime and let me know if I should be doing something different.

Edited by Mstorm18
Had tire sizes reversed
Texanfisherman Enthusiast

Texanfisherman

Posted
Posted (edited)

The 275/65 will fit without a level kit. Possible that an extreme tread may rub a little, but it will fit. If you want to level on the cheap, I personally would not install anything more than a 1” without also replacing a-arms to correct geometry and improve the ball joint. Just my $.02. I have the silverado with the factory 2” and will do the BDS arms when I swap the tires. I will run a 295/65 with a 2” level and the BDS arms. 

Edited by Texanfisherman
SierraStorm21 Enthusiast

SierraStorm21

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
48 minutes ago, Texanfisherman said:

You have your current and desired tire sizes reversed, but the 275/65 will fit without a level kit. Possible that an extreme tread may rub a little, but it will fit. If you want to level on the cheap, I personally would not install anything more than a 1” without also replacing a-arms to correct geometry and improve the ball joint. Just my $.02. I have the silverado with the factory 2” and will do the BDS arms when I swap the tires. I will run a 295/65 with a 2” level and the BDS arms. 

Good catch. Thanks! Edited

a-arms? The UCA's, right? The kit I linked has new ones that come with it, is that not right?

Edited by Mstorm18
Texanfisherman Enthusiast

Texanfisherman

Posted
Posted

Yes, a-arms/UCAs same thing. This is what I am banking on: https://www.jackit.com/bds-121260.html?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9deiBhC1ARIsAHLjR2AH8h5vX_coGf8m9IH8Lxcw94-iiPk3Z34gA3d21xnTpKfHIzrYd4QaAqlMEALw_wcB

 

Same setup they use in their 4 or 6 lifts. Just in case I want to go higher later. More expensive, but hard to find anyone dissatisfied with BDS and their quality. 

SierraStorm21 Enthusiast

SierraStorm21

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I think the more I read up on this, that perhaps the best thing to do is just have the front shocks swapped out for the 5100 Bilsteins, the ride adjustable ones to get a 1.1" lift. Seems doing so keeps things more within spec while still getting a slight lift in the front. While it may not be completely leveled, it's better than stock. 

  • Like 1
Luc1f3r Enthusiast

Luc1f3r

Posted
Posted

To everyone who levels their trucks, do you never carry heavy loads or tow? The factory Rake is meant to compensate for that.

 

Also stock height AT4 will fit 35x12 general grabbers with a slight rub on the mud flaps at full lock.

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, Mstorm18 said:

I think the more I read up on this, that perhaps the best thing to do is just have the front shocks swapped out for the 5100 Bilsteins, the ride adjustable ones to get a 1.1" lift. Seems doing so keeps things more within spec while still getting a slight lift in the front. While it may not be completely leveled, it's better than stock. 

 

 

I'd still get arms.  Non AT4s with a leveling kit will still fail the UCA.  We've had two come in now, one with significant damage to other components.  

SierraStorm21 Enthusiast

SierraStorm21

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, newdude said:

 

 

I'd still get arms.  Non AT4s with a leveling kit will still fail the UCA.  We've had two come in now, one with significant damage to other components.  

 

Ugh, good to know. Any reason not to get the Bilstein version of those if I go with the upgraded shocks?

 

https://cart.bilsteinus.com/details?id=2972832273118789803&fyv=true&Year=1490468497551627837&Make=7109127503953767713&Model=2312292685622996290&Submodel=2928454506658859972&Pos=Front Upper&En=3896745598793439258

 

Or is another brand a better option? 

SierraStorm21 Enthusiast

SierraStorm21

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 hours ago, Luc1f3r said:

To everyone who levels their trucks, do you never carry heavy loads or tow? The factory Rake is meant to compensate for that.

 

Also stock height AT4 will fit 35x12 general grabbers with a slight rub on the mud flaps at full lock.

I'm sure everyone knows that, but most that are going for that leveled look aren't towing or carrying heavy loads on a daily or even weekly basis. I surely don't and if I was, I'd just get air bags to compensate. It's all about the look.

 

I didn't want to go to 35's because I swapped out the factory flaps for the molded ones that hang down slightly lower to prevent rock throw from hitting the panels and that would require even more modifications. I think 34's are the best I'll get and I'm ok with that.

  • Like 1
newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Mstorm18 said:

 

Ugh, good to know. Any reason not to get the Bilstein version of those if I go with the upgraded shocks?

 

https://cart.bilsteinus.com/details?id=2972832273118789803&fyv=true&Year=1490468497551627837&Make=7109127503953767713&Model=2312292685622996290&Submodel=2928454506658859972&Pos=Front Upper&En=3896745598793439258

 

Or is another brand a better option? 

 

 

Can't speak on them really but from quick reading at that link, they appear to be engineered for use with a lift strut like theirs so would be a good move to pair them with their struts.  It does say not compatible with lift spacers which is interesting so I wonder if there is a clearance or geometry change on these where you can't do that.  

SierraStorm21 Enthusiast

SierraStorm21

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, PureZ71 said:

Similar to Trail bosses, AT4 also recommends getting new UCA. I went with ReadyLift kit to level mine

 

ReadyLIFT 2" SST Kit

 

loamo1m.jpg

How long have you had it on? No issues I assume?

Ran into a friend of mine today who's in the mechanical program. Was talking about how I should have the ADAS system recalibrated after doing a level? I had planned on redoing the headlights, but hadn't thought about the cameras and other systems needing to be recalibrated. That's something I haven't seen anyone discuss on here...

PureZ71 Enthusiast

PureZ71

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Mstorm18 said:

How long have you had it on? No issues I assume?

Ran into a friend of mine today who's in the mechanical program. Was talking about how I should have the ADAS system recalibrated after doing a level? I had planned on redoing the headlights, but hadn't thought about the cameras and other systems needing to be recalibrated. That's something I haven't seen anyone discuss on here...

I've had it on for about two years now. Been great! even go off roading here and there.

 

My truck doesn't have any of that fancy cameras and stuff so I cant help you there. But I doubt that's an issue. I did lower the headlights a little since the kit brought the front end up (didn't want to blind people lol).

4banger Enthusiast

4banger

Posted
Posted
On 5/8/2023 at 2:48 PM, PureZ71 said:

Similar to Trail bosses, AT4 also recommends getting new UCA. I went with ReadyLift kit to level mine

 

ReadyLIFT 2" SST Kit

 

loamo1m.jpg

 

 

doesn't look level to me, bigger fender gap up front and the line under the windows is pointed uphill, looks like you just went and got a load of gravel already

 

these trucks look best with a bit of rake, and x2 on trailering or using it as a truck, I've come to realize the engineers and designers get a lot more right than we give em credit for

  • Like 3
Luc1f3r Enthusiast

Luc1f3r

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, 4banger said:

 

 

these trucks look best with a bit of rake, and x2 on trailering or using it as a truck, I've come to realize the engineers and designers get a lot more right than we give em credit for

We occasionally get things right...😆

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Chuck FB
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      Its no wonder you've gravitated to the oil types and brands you have in later years after trying certain brands and one being a specialty oil or at least very hard to come by up here and the other would have been a commonly found oil of the era and the vastly different outcomes as a result to using the vehicles in question the same distance for an OCI . It shows what marketing hype can do without actually having the product to back up the claims and that is no different now with the insane claims that are written on the side of a bottle of oil from some of the off the shelf oils.    What has surprised me and I was already finding this out before I bought my truck with the GDI engine, that this newer fancy technology that seemingly would suggest better fuel economy/emissions with this high pressure spray of fuel is not in reality kind at all to the engine or at least the oils life. Yet they insist on claiming long OCI with this technology just like they did with the port or similar type fuel injection systems when in reality its a step back in oil life to have a GDI system.    I think the mistake your making Grumpy is that your not sending your samples to Blackstone and getting the feel good glowing report that you can run it another 1000 or more miles and then send another sample where they say run it yet another 1000 miles and on and on it goes until your sending in something that looks a lot like road tar and then they may suggest you change your oil within the next 1000 miles 😆
    • Chuck FB
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      In the 80's 90's I'd run Honda's 7,500 miles between changes using Red Line HP 5W20 and do it for hundreds of thousands of miles with issues. Back in the day it was an SAE 20 with the HTHS of a SAE 30 and SN add load. It was also very polar. Oxidation VOA was over 120. Besides those motors were SPFI and lean burn tech. I could have likely run it longer but never did.    We had a Toyota bought new I ran on Pennzoil's latest and greatest synthetic of the day with "Penthane". A made up word for a very low dose of PAO. Tried 7,500 mile OCI's in that Group III/VI chemistry and the rings tapped out at 90K. Rocker box wasn't as bad as the one Punch put up but it wasn't good either. Also a SPFI motor.    I'm around 3,750 across the board on these GDI monsters and the oil it tapped out by then usually on TBN/TAN crossover and color. Red Line HP Euro.    The AMSOIL SS brochures tell you to follow the OEM values for the service class but that it can be run up to 25K if monitored. I can't imagine what motor could go that distance and not tap out. I've never owned one.    Yes, I know. Lot's of people do. I'm just not going to be one of them. 
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      I knew a guy in the early 80's that bought a new Monte Carlo and ran it a 100,000 miles without ever changing the filter or the oil. Just kept adding. It looked like that inside.     
    • whenindoubtuseahammer
      My First Project and GMC has me stumped

      By whenindoubtuseahammer · Posted

      Good evening. I was lucky enough to get passed down to me a 2007 GMC LBZ that was my great uncle's. While the underside and rockers are more or less gone I feel like with time I can restore it to working order since it only has 110,000 miles and he put nearly every option he could get without getting the new body style since he did not trust DEF. So far I have done everything I can think of but when I put the key into the ignition nothing happens. I put 2 brand new batteries in it. Cleaned the terminals. Check all the fuses and relays and they all pass with my multimeter. I know I'm missing something that I just cant think of. The only odd thing is the OBD2 port works which makes me think its not the mega fuse. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...