Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I am looking at some wheels and tires.  Raceline Ryno 17 inch with 35x 12.50 Mickey Thompson Baja Boss AT.  I can't decide between the 0 offset or the -12.  I would love to have some input on this.  They have the -12 in stock but the 0 is backordered.  Would the -12 even be noticeable from the 0?  Any input is appreciated and any pictures would be greatly appreciated!  By the way my truck has a 3.5 Cognito Coilover lift with new UCA's

Posted

I vote for 0.  Obviously it also depends on the width of the wheel and the tire size, but in most cases -12 sticks out significantly.  With wide wheels and tires it can stick out A LOT.  I have 315/70R17's on 8.5 wheels with 0 offset and the tread edge is dead even with my fenders. 

Posted

The difference is 12mm. I have -12 on mine and they stick out a little. If you want a more a flush look, wait for the 0.

 

IVsIBvA.jpg

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

The 0mm offset should only be on the 8.5" wide and the -12 on the 17x9. But your looking at .25" diff on the backspace and maybe a little wider tire balloon on the 17x9's.  

 

I'm in same boat as most of the 17x8.5's I like are backordered. I like the clutch from raceline

Edited by Vincej138
Added
Posted

Thanks guys- I think that I may pull the trigger on the -12's.  I like the look of those on yours PureZ71.

  • Like 1
Posted

Since PureZ71's suspension and tire/wheel setup is pretty close to mine, this will make a pretty useful comparison.  I had to dig through his build thread cause he didn't post his wheel specs but it looks like he's on 18x9's with a -12 offset and 35" tires.  Mine are 17x8.5's with a 0 offset also on 35" tires.  

 

20230630_144232.thumb.jpg.74dab0a6651b9cfab1ac7509c8e17b76.jpg

 

One difference is that I have the AIR design flares, but they aren't real big.  But I think this does a good job of showing the difference in poke between 0 and -12.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

-12 will stick out about 2". I needed a 3/8" spacer to clear the brake calipers. 

 

Im running 20x10 -12 with 275/60R20 tires (factory size).

 

Useful tool:

 

 https://tiresize.com/wheel-offset-calculator/

 

 

Im running 20x10 -12 with 275/60R20 tires (factory size).

Edited by jashaw
Posted

I have -12 and i like the look but on the Seirra it will out you into issues with rub if you up the tire size. i kinda wish i went with 0mm now. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

-12 will require way more front fender work to not rub. I have owned four T1 trucks and had to do a LOT of trimming and metal bending when I ran 18x9 et-15 BC Forged wheels as opposed to my previous Rotiforms in 17x8.5 et0 and current BC in 18x9 et0. Current 2023 AT4 all I did was pull the fender liner brackets out, which I did preemptively because I can do it with my eyes closed after all these T1s.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

see enough trucks running around with chewed out fenders due to fatties on the offsets that all done with that nonsense, these things are way too expensive now to be beating on them like that, I went from stock 20's with the 33"x11" to 17's with 33"x10" LT 10 ply snowflake at's and dropped 4 lbs a corner, added 1.5" sidewall to retain ride, and 0 offset but skinny tires so I stayed inside the fender but it still pushed the tires out a bit past the stock set up, worked out perfect, dropped 4 lbs a corner to boot, get killer mileage and my actual off-road and snow traction is way better...fatty's no more

Edited by 4banger
  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,958
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    B07
    Newest Member
    B07
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 804 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
    • Looking for this part for my truck. They don't sell just that one piece and to get it you have to pay over $100 even used for the whole air tube. The piece the hose clamp snaps into that is held on by the screw and nut. If anyone has access to one please let me know.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...