Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Happy New Year everyone.  I have a 2024 Silverado RST Z71.  I want to add the Z71 grill emblem.  The new trail boss has this emblem.  I need the part number for the plastic emblem holder that fits the grill and the emblem.  The 2019-2021 does not fit the new grill.  Does anyone add this emblem?  I would appreciate it if someone had the part numbers.

 

Thanks for the help

Posted
1 hour ago, Darthmalo said:

Happy New Year everyone.  I have a 2024 Silverado RST Z71.  I want to add the Z71 grill emblem.  The new trail boss has this emblem.  I need the part number for the plastic emblem holder that fits the grill and the emblem.  The 2019-2021 does not fit the new grill.  Does anyone add this emblem?  I would appreciate it if someone had the part numbers.

 

Thanks for the help

 

 

Someone here was already looking into this.  The "mount" isn't serviceable on the new grilles.  Its molded part of the grille.  

Posted
1 hour ago, newdude said:

 

 

Someone here was already looking into this.  The "mount" isn't serviceable on the new grilles.  Its molded part of the grille.  

ok.  Thanks

  • 8 months later...
Posted

im going to bump this thread. The trail boss has the z71 emblem now. does anyone have a part number for the insert that pops into the lower half of the grille to install the z71? Its a square black box that snaps into the lower hole right side.

Posted
9 hours ago, Ryan Tierney said:

im going to bump this thread. The trail boss has the z71 emblem now. does anyone have a part number for the insert that pops into the lower half of the grille to install the z71? Its a square black box that snaps into the lower hole right side.

Read newdudes post above. There is no insert. You need a Trail Boss grille to have the Z71 emblem in the grille.

Posted
16 hours ago, Bikerjon said:

Read newdudes post above. There is no insert. You need a Trail Boss grille to have the Z71 emblem in the grille.

This is false. Its no longer molded for 2024. my buddy's pops out. Will take a picture over the weekend. 2022 1/2 and 2023 was molded

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
On 9/3/2024 at 11:31 AM, Ryan Tierney said:

im going to bump this thread. The trail boss has the z71 emblem now. does anyone have a part number for the insert that pops into the lower half of the grille to install the z71? Its a square black box that snaps into the lower hole right side.

 

On 9/4/2024 at 12:55 PM, Ryan Tierney said:

This is false. Its no longer molded for 2024. my buddy's pops out. Will take a picture over the weekend. 2022 1/2 and 2023 was molded

 

 

Grilles are same p/n 2022.5-2025.  

 

26 minutes ago, korey waters said:

Also interested in finding this. I have a 2022 RST z71. Looking for the square mounting bracket for the z71 grille badge. On the 2024 trailboss,  it's not molded to the grille.

 

 

My original info was working off the catalog drawings which make it appear molded. 

 

They don't list the mount separate from the whole grille assembly, so even though the mount may come off and is not molded, GM doesn't just sell the mount on its own.  This is for 2022.5 (2022 refresh) to current trucks.  

 

You need to buy the whole grille as far as they are concerned.  This applies to the Custom Trail Boss and LT Trail Boss grilles. 

 

2019-2022 pre refresh, those trucks had a serviceable Z71 emblem mount.  It is different than the refresh trucks.  

Edited by newdude

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...