Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 2017 Silverado 1500 LT with a 5.3L with 114.000 miles that I bought from the original owner two years ago. I am sorry for the length of this post as I have tried to give the briefest but comprehensive analysis possible. I began noticing random misfires on occasions about 6 months ago but they have became more frequent and now are not intermittent anymore but constant. I currently have a steady CEL and codes P0300 and P219A. It shows up on light to moderate acceleration. I took it to a GM tech who suggested decarbonizing the engine. It made no difference at all, so he then suggested replacing the injectors. I did that myself to save a couple bucks and used GM injectors. In the last 6 months I have had two new sets of AC plugs in it and all the plug wires. I had a coil pack failure on cyl #1 so I replaced it and the misfire there went away. Erratic misfires began to start up again so I replaced all the other coil packs as well but the problem remained. The GM tech now thinks I have a collapsed lifter issue. I pulled both valve covers and inspected rockers, lifters and valve springs...no problems found. The inside of the engine looks pristine. There are no wobbly rockers and when spinning the engine over, all 16 valves appear to be opening consistent to all the others. Does not appear to have any wiped lobes or bent push rods. The original owner changed oil religiously at 3K intervals and I have followed that pattern myself. I drained the oil pan and looked for any traces of metal in the oil and found absolutely nothing. The oil is still very clean and clear and easy to see if contaminated. My scanner shows cylinders 2 and 5 as the chronic misfires  I have switched plugs, wires and coil packs from good firing cylinders to see if the misfire will move to those cylinders but the misfires stay with 2 and 5. Since both are non-AFM cylinders, it kinda counters the GM techs theory of lifter problem, especially since visual inspection revealed nothing. Another data concern are the fuel trims. Bank 1 LTFT is around -15% and Bank 2 LTFT is around -28% which indicates a rich condition. I am puzzled that with the high negative LTFT, all the plugs are light colored almost white and certainly don't show a rich condition. Are the O2 sensors somehow being fooled? Their numbers look normal. The high fuel pressure is running around 480-600. The low fuel pressure jumps around while driving, I see it go as low as 25 and as high as 63...it never really holds steady very long, is that normal or possibly a sign of a fuel delivery issue? One more thing I'll throw out there, when it is missing and bucking on light load acceleration, if I kick it down and floor it, it takes off without any hesitation and runs strong and smooth. That seems kind of odd to me considering the multiple misfires. What am I overlooking here? I welcome any thoughts or ideas about this chronic misfire condition. 

Posted

How is the wiring to the coil packs? 

When changing the plugs did you double check the plug gap? 

And have insured the wire is firmly snapped on the plug. I personally haven't experienced a collapsed lifter, but from my understanding it's a noticeable sound when it happens. When I had this issue it was due to needing plugs and wires. And I also put the updated gas pedal in. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks for the suggestions, Buck. No, I haven't researched the wiring to the coils, perhaps that could be the issue. Does that involve a check of reference voltage and ground continuity? I hear talk about checking the various ground points on the engine or frame...maybe that could be a factor? I haven't heard of the gas pedal deal, what's the issue with that? Thanks again.

Posted

 

11 hours ago, ktuck said:

I have a 2017 Silverado 1500 LT with a 5.3L with 114.000 miles that I bought from the original owner two years ago. I am sorry for the length of this post as I have tried to give the briefest but comprehensive analysis possible. I began noticing random misfires on occasions about 6 months ago but they have became more frequent and now are not intermittent anymore but constant. I currently have a steady CEL and codes P0300 and P219A. It shows up on light to moderate acceleration. I took it to a GM tech who suggested decarbonizing the engine. It made no difference at all, so he then suggested replacing the injectors. I did that myself to save a couple bucks and used GM injectors. In the last 6 months I have had two new sets of AC plugs in it and all the plug wires. I had a coil pack failure on cyl #1 so I replaced it and the misfire there went away. Erratic misfires began to start up again so I replaced all the other coil packs as well but the problem remained. The GM tech now thinks I have a collapsed lifter issue. I pulled both valve covers and inspected rockers, lifters and valve springs...no problems found. The inside of the engine looks pristine. There are no wobbly rockers and when spinning the engine over, all 16 valves appear to be opening consistent to all the others. Does not appear to have any wiped lobes or bent push rods. The original owner changed oil religiously at 3K intervals and I have followed that pattern myself. I drained the oil pan and looked for any traces of metal in the oil and found absolutely nothing. The oil is still very clean and clear and easy to see if contaminated. My scanner shows cylinders 2 and 5 as the chronic misfires  I have switched plugs, wires and coil packs from good firing cylinders to see if the misfire will move to those cylinders but the misfires stay with 2 and 5. Since both are non-AFM cylinders, it kinda counters the GM techs theory of lifter problem, especially since visual inspection revealed nothing. Another data concern are the fuel trims. Bank 1 LTFT is around -15% and Bank 2 LTFT is around -28% which indicates a rich condition. I am puzzled that with the high negative LTFT, all the plugs are light colored almost white and certainly don't show a rich condition. Are the O2 sensors somehow being fooled? Their numbers look normal. The high fuel pressure is running around 480-600. The low fuel pressure jumps around while driving, I see it go as low as 25 and as high as 63...it never really holds steady very long, is that normal or possibly a sign of a fuel delivery issue? One more thing I'll throw out there, when it is missing and bucking on light load acceleration, if I kick it down and floor it, it takes off without any hesitation and runs strong and smooth. That seems kind of odd to me considering the multiple misfires. What am I overlooking here? I welcome any thoughts or ideas about this chronic misfire condition. 

 

 

What p/n injectors did you use?  Did you replace all 8?  

Posted

I used OEM injectors. They have GM part #, I don't remember what it was. I did replace all 8. It seemed to make sense to do so after going all that trouble.

  • Like 1
Posted

I found my receipt for the injectors, the GM number on them is 12668390. Since I think I have eliminated plugs, wires and coils by substitution, it may be worth going back in and switching some of the injectors around to see if that moves the misfire problem away from #2 or 5. I'm quite aware of the chance of getting a defective new part. I also am concerned with the wide variance in fuel pressure...could that be playing a part in this?

  • Like 1
Posted

the negative fuel trims are an indication that there is to much oxygen in the exhaust, i would monitor the maf sensor and the o2 sensors. it is indicating that there is unmetered air getting in from somewhere, maybe an intake leak after the maf sensor. 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 4/12/2024 at 11:14 AM, ktuck said:

Thanks for the suggestions, Buck. No, I haven't researched the wiring to the coils, perhaps that could be the issue. Does that involve a check of reference voltage and ground continuity? I hear talk about checking the various ground points on the engine or frame...maybe that could be a factor? I haven't heard of the gas pedal deal, what's the issue with that? Thanks again.

Gm updated their gas pedal at some point in 2017, I'm unsure of exact time. It eliminates some of the pedal lag. Checking and cleaning all grounds is always a good plan. As far as the coil wires I would just start with a visual inspection for damaged wires. 

Posted

My two cents, I have a 2018 'Rado and my HP  fuel pressure is a lot higher than that, in the 1,500 psi range and higher, may look into that.  Have you told your GM tech about your low HP fuel range

Posted
On 4/14/2024 at 9:18 AM, silveradosid said:

the negative fuel trims are an indication that there is to much oxygen in the exhaust, i would monitor the maf sensor and the o2 sensors. it is indicating that there is unmetered air getting in from somewhere, maybe an intake leak after the maf sensor. 

My GM tech is telling me negative LTFT indicates a rich mixture, but he has been wrong about a couple other things I found out. Also, the spark plugs do not indicate a rich mixture, but more towards lean. The porcelains are very light tan, almost still white. He thinks my o2 sensors are being "fooled" into reporting a rich mixture and as a result the ECM is pulling back fuel...hmmm, does this make any sense?

Posted
On 4/16/2024 at 1:36 PM, rlcole321 said:

My two cents, I have a 2018 'Rado and my HP  fuel pressure is a lot higher than that, in the 1,500 psi range and higher, may look into that.  Have you told your GM tech about your low HP fuel range

This is what my scanner is reporting to be my low side fuel pressure as I understand it. It is supposed run around 50 psi or so? I'm not real sure on that and haven't found the accurate spec for it yet. However, my scanner reads as low as 25 to as high as 63 psi. I don't think that is normal, is it?

 

Also, my scanner gives a readout for commanded fuel rail pressure of 580psi at idle and 580 at 2K. On the high fuel pressure side, my fuel rail pressure is running between 480-603 at idle and 574-602 at 2K. So, is it safe to assume that in reference to the commanded fuel rail pressure readings, mine are within range pretty much? The low side of course may be another story and I do not know if that wide range of variation is normal due to engine load, temperature or other sensor inputs.

Posted

I am trying to figure out this problem I'm having methodically and accurately, and I must say, it has challenged my skillset greatly! To briefly restate, my primary issue is a constant misfire on cylinders 2 and 5, with an occasional misfire on #7 to a much lesser extent. All other cylinders firing off like clockwork. Two permanent codes persist, P0300 and P219A. The concerning data I am getting from my scanner is the very high negative long term fuel trims and questionable fuel pressure readings. I have read about various causes of high negative trim and they point to things like MAF, O2 sensors, leaky injectors, high fuel pressure and not enough air. I am inclined to focus on the two misfiring cylinders and consider causes that would isolate those two cylinders. For instance, if the MAF was defective, would it isolate just two cylinders and all others fire just fine? I don't think so. Same thing with high fuel pressure, or O2 sensors. Cylinders 2 and 5 are on opposite banks, if it were to be because of inaccurate O2 data, then there would have to be an O2 sensor on each bank that is bad in the same way...not too likely it seems to me. With that line of thinking, if that makes any sense at all, I feel like I should focus on an injector problem which most certainly could isolate one or more cylinders. It was about a month ago, I installed a new set of OEM injectors. As best as I recall, I have intermittent misfires prior to that, but not the consistent misfire on the two cylinders I have now. As many have said, there is no assurance that a new part couldn't be bad right out of the box. Also, and perhaps more likely, I may have done something during the installation of the injectors that brought this about even though I felt like I took great care and diligence when doing so. This is one time where I would not be too mad at myself if I find out I boogered up the job somehow, because at least then I would be able to finally put this problem behind me! Does this approach to the diagnosis at this point sound logically to all of you? I certainly welcome any other ideas I haven't considered yet.

Posted
6 minutes ago, ktuck said:

I am trying to figure out this problem I'm having methodically and accurately, and I must say, it has challenged my skillset greatly! To briefly restate, my primary issue is a constant misfire on cylinders 2 and 5, with an occasional misfire on #7 to a much lesser extent. All other cylinders firing off like clockwork. Two permanent codes persist, P0300 and P219A. The concerning data I am getting from my scanner is the very high negative long term fuel trims and questionable fuel pressure readings. I have read about various causes of high negative trim and they point to things like MAF, O2 sensors, leaky injectors, high fuel pressure and not enough air. I am inclined to focus on the two misfiring cylinders and consider causes that would isolate those two cylinders. For instance, if the MAF was defective, would it isolate just two cylinders and all others fire just fine? I don't think so. Same thing with high fuel pressure, or O2 sensors. Cylinders 2 and 5 are on opposite banks, if it were to be because of inaccurate O2 data, then there would have to be an O2 sensor on each bank that is bad in the same way...not too likely it seems to me. With that line of thinking, if that makes any sense at all, I feel like I should focus on an injector problem which most certainly could isolate one or more cylinders. It was about a month ago, I installed a new set of OEM injectors. As best as I recall, I have intermittent misfires prior to that, but not the consistent misfire on the two cylinders I have now. As many have said, there is no assurance that a new part couldn't be bad right out of the box. Also, and perhaps more likely, I may have done something during the installation of the injectors that brought this about even though I felt like I took great care and diligence when doing so. This is one time where I would not be too mad at myself if I find out I boogered up the job somehow, because at least then I would be able to finally put this problem behind me! Does this approach to the diagnosis at this point sound logically to all of you? I certainly welcome any other ideas I haven't considered yet.

 

 

I wonder if you've got 2 bad injectors.  Going off the p/n you posted on your receipt, that # is a VERY old number.  If you got some that were sitting around for some time, you could have a couple faulty injectors.  If you got fresh ones when you bought those, you should have seen 12710481 (current #) or 12698484 or 12684125 (last 2 numbers GM used).  

Posted
2 hours ago, newdude said:

 

 

I wonder if you've got 2 bad injectors.  Going off the p/n you posted on your receipt, that # is a VERY old number.  If you got some that were sitting around for some time, you could have a couple faulty injectors.  If you got fresh ones when you bought those, you should have seen 12710481 (current #) or 12698484 or 12684125 (last 2 numbers GM used).  

Wow, that is good information to know, thanks newdude. That kinda makes me more inclined now to go ahead and redo the injectors, although the injectors I put in have the same GM part # as the original ones I took out. That is why I bought them, I assumed they were an exact match. Apparently, they have been upgraded since 2017. At this point, it would be worth it to purchase all new injectors with the current part # you listed and see what happens. Another reason I suspect injectors as the culprit is that when I floor it, it pulls fine with no hint of misfire. That makes me think the injectors, for whatever reason, are getting adequate fuel spray at higher speeds/load and at idle and light throttle driving not so much. Thanks again for enlightening me on those new part numbers.

Posted
14 hours ago, ktuck said:

Wow, that is good information to know, thanks newdude. That kinda makes me more inclined now to go ahead and redo the injectors, although the injectors I put in have the same GM part # as the original ones I took out. That is why I bought them, I assumed they were an exact match. Apparently, they have been upgraded since 2017. At this point, it would be worth it to purchase all new injectors with the current part # you listed and see what happens. Another reason I suspect injectors as the culprit is that when I floor it, it pulls fine with no hint of misfire. That makes me think the injectors, for whatever reason, are getting adequate fuel spray at higher speeds/load and at idle and light throttle driving not so much. Thanks again for enlightening me on those new part numbers.

 

 

Its not so much that they are "upgraded".  The numbers can change just from changing supplier even.  My thinking is you got old stock and could have 2 bad ones.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 452 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...