Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am looking at trucks simply because I’m looking for a relatively smoother riding truck and because it’s about time to trade in my current truck. 
 

current truck is a 2023 f350 lariat single rear wheel. Been a flawless truck for me and it has a 23,000lb tow rating. So it’s been great when I was towing a little heavier but we’ve got several other trucks in our fleet now that can move our equipment around. 
 

with a decreased need for heavy towing I’m looking at a 2500 Denali hoping it will ride softer. 
 

with that being said I’m looking for feedback on several things. 
 

1–will a 2500 gmc ride smoother than my current f350?

 

 

2–are there any common problems with the 24s? I hear people have been having oil cooler issues (mixing coolant and oil which is no good). Anything else?

 

 

3–level kits on these trucks seem to really ruin the ride with the torsion bar setup. Any decent kits to get 2”? I don’t want a 6” lift on 40s. But I do like messing with my trucks a little bit

 

 

4–I’ve also been spoiled with the fords and how easy it is to run bigger tires…..these square wheel wells on the gmcs don’t seem as big. What’s the biggest tire I can run stock?  My current truck is 2” leveled and 37s with plenty of room to spare. 
 

thanks in advance for the advice. I’m not familiar with these trucks

  • Like 1
Posted

You really need to go test drive them to see if it rides softer. Just because it says Denali on the side doesn't mean it will ride better, it's still the same heavy duty suspension under the truck. Most trucks will ride a little smoother with weight in the bed or towing, just your normal everyday driving with nothing in the bed will likely ride the worst. Mainly because the suspension in unloaded and the tires will have lots of air pressure in them which causes a rougher ride.

 

For sure a 35in tire will fit. The biggest stock tire is like a 34in if I remember right but I'd need to double check.

 

You didn't say if you wanted a gas truck or a diesel truck.

Posted

Diesel and of course trim level doesn’t decide stiffness in the ride. That’s why I put in the relevant information of f350 vs gmc 2500. Looking for that feedback from anyone who has been there and done that. Never had a GM truck before always had ram or super duty……that’s all. 
 

 

Posted

They are both heavy duty trucks and ride like it. My '24 2500 does ride slightly nicer than my '21 F350 did though.

 

The main issue that seems to have popped up on various forums is 10-speed valve body failures.

 

I have no input on running bigger tires.

Posted
4 hours ago, Ry Guy said:

They are both heavy duty trucks and ride like it. My '24 2500 does ride slightly nicer than my '21 F350 did though.

 

The main issue that seems to have popped up on various forums is 10-speed valve body failures.

 

I have no input on running bigger tires.

Yeah I’m seeing people experiencing nightmares with the valve bodies in these trucks. Wait times from GM in a lot of the cases I’m seeing seem long. 
 

I always thought this ten speed was co-developed with Ford to some degree so it would be similar to the one on my current F350 (and it’s been rock solid).

Posted
1 hour ago, Rwhjr said:

Yeah I’m seeing people experiencing nightmares with the valve bodies in these trucks. Wait times from GM in a lot of the cases I’m seeing seem long. 
 

I always thought this ten speed was co-developed with Ford to some degree so it would be similar to the one on my current F350 (and it’s been rock solid).


That was the half ton truck transmissions. The heavy duty truck as I understand it was not co-developed. 

Posted

the independent front suspension is much nicer than Ram and Ford imo.....had 4 of these and no issues so far, low miles too....the digital steering on higher trims is a plus vs LT and below......havet lifted it but craking on torsion bars will stiffen it....there are coilover kits available but $$$....

 

any truck can have an issue so just depends

Posted

If you must go to GM I would go with a 25' to hope I escape the 10l transmission issues. I have been looking at the super duty's myself and I didn't find the ride to be that much harsher then my 23' Sierra 2500. I would test drive one to see, If the Ford has been flawless maybe switch to a f250 instead. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • same here , i have a 2020 first gen and the cost to repair these engines far excedes replacement
    • But Grumpy I did show several subdivisions that had homes starting in the 170K range. If you bought a Townhouse or Condo you could go cheaper. Same with a car 3000 dollars in the 70s translates to around 20K today. There are several models at that price. You actually get more for the money. In the 70s I drove a 3000$ car bought a 28K home and made 4.50 per hour. Thank goodness for overtime. Today I could buy a 170K house drive a 20K car and make 25 dollars an hour operating the same machine today. The difference the house, car, machine would be better and have AC. And I wouldn’t be taxed on overtime. And statistically your wife works too. Easing the burden. I thought we agreed to disagree. I brought receipts earlier, showing examples. I think you’re more stubborn than me. I was done with this debate. 
    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...