Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just bought a 2025 suburban ls. My wife hates that the lift gate is manual. Can I add some part and convert it to power lift gate? If so what do I need? Thank you

Posted
18 minutes ago, RAWBurban said:

I just bought a 2025 suburban ls. My wife hates that the lift gate is manual. Can I add some part and convert it to power lift gate? If so what do I need? Thank you

 

 

In all seriousness, if it was a priority item for you and your wife, should have gone LT to get the power gate.  

 

Definitely not an item that can be added after its built.  The system has the power strut, a liftgate control module and its programming, and all the wiring through the truck for it as the body wiring is different for power gate equipped and manual gate equipped.  

  • Like 1
Posted

Amazing people think modifying vehicles today is doable, this isn't the old days. 

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, newdude said:

 

 

In all seriousness, if it was a priority item for you and your wife, should have gone LT to get the power gate.  

 

Definitely not an item that can be added after its built.  The system has the power strut, a liftgate control module and its programming, and all the wiring through the truck for it as the body wiring is different for power gate equipped and manual gate equipped.  


yea I already looked into power strut, the control module, and was hoping the wiring might have been there but just not used. The parts aren’t expensive but the wiring part is a no go lol. Thanks

Posted
5 hours ago, diyer2 said:

Amazing people think modifying vehicles today is doable, this isn't the old days. 


why did you even comment? Lol boring life I see. Try getting a wife that might help!

Posted

why did you even comment? Lol boring life I see. Try getting a wife that might help!

Because I thought it was right on.

  • Like 1
Posted

If you're like me, you like to keep them for a long time.

That means the manual gate will piss you/her off for a long time. 

I'd be talking to the sales person and finding what it would take to move up one trim level. 

 

For 2025 model, LS is the only trim without power lift.

 

image.thumb.png.86617c5aacbeb559debc7499deecaaeb.png

  • Like 1
  • 9 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...