Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Just wanted to share my experience, I got the "service parking brake" message awhile ago, it's just a parking brake. 🤓

 

I have the Ford/Allison MGM 10L1000 transmission so I need to get the truck to the dealer for the software bailout (N242454440). But before I do that I wanted to get all the DTCs cleared and such, last thing I need is the dealer telling me what they want a few $k for a parking brake job, I am strong believer in the right to repair. Alldata lists 2.4 hours of labor for both wheels.

 

I had an XTOOL AD20 Pro OBDII scanner quickly on hand and I pulled:

 

C15DD-00 Parking brake excessive wear detected Brake System Control Module (BSCM)
C15DD-00 No description found-Electronic Brake Control Module (EBCM)

 

I went to O'Reilly Auto and the shoes that they have listed do not work with this model truck. At the time written, the model number does not match, you can read my one star review with a picture of the OEM one here:

https://www.oreillyauto.com/detail/c/brakebest-select-brake-shoes/brakebest-select-brake-shoes-9-inch-bonded-brake-shoes/bgs0/1050/v/a/149155/automotive-truck-2020-chevrolet-silverado-2500-hd?q=parking+brake&pos=0,


this shoe and the one Napa has listed too do not fit. The employee at Napa had a hard time finding the part number and he even brought the part to the desk and cut the plastic off so that we can compare to the OEM ones that I brought in. They did not match.


I order Powerstop B1117, I have used a lot of Powerstop brake products over the years without issue(s). And this was no exception.

 

I also have a Thinkcar 689BT bidirectional scan tool, this has been a great tool! I was having an issue with the driver side express window close feature not working when closing. I used the scan tool to fix this. I have also learned that the truck definitely has current draw while powered off. This was proven with seeing the the DTC B3883-01, I removed the OEM rear bumper and installed a Hammerhead bumper.

 

When I pulled the rear passenger side rotor off, the shoe facing to the rear was down to the metal! I do not recall driving with the parking brake on! And I would think that the truck would warn you about the behavior! I found that someone else had a similar issue, https://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/267997-service-parking-brake/

And as mentioned the brake shoes can be replaced without pulling the hub off, and be sure to have 45 degree needle nose pliers and other small picking and pulling tools, this is a PITA!

 

Using the 869BT I actuated the right rear parking brake, but I made the mistake of doing it with the rotor off and the actuator expanded to as far as it could go and an error popped up on the scan tool, “device limits exceeded anti-lock braking system solenoid valves or pump motor malfunction” and it did not retract. I am not sure if this is the way it was supposed to function, expand 1st and then retract? If this is the correct function, I suspected that it was trying to find the resistance of the rotor being in place and effectively engaging the parking brake 1st and then releasing. This make sense because I recall reading that the system time to retract (2.5 seconds?) is monitored and if the time is exceeded the DTC is set. So if you get in this situation pull the actuator motor off use a T-40 torx to retract the actuator, I had a Dewalt right angle drill that helped with this. Once the shoes were replaced I tested my theory by actuating the right rear parking brake with the rotor on and it did apply pressure 1st and then retracted. Started the truck and applied the EPB on and off three times, the error cleared.

 

Yes, I still have the driver side shoes to replace, but it is just a parking brake and now I can the truck off to the dealer for the recall fix.

Before I ordered the Powerstop shoes I called around to 4 dealers and non of them had the shoes in stock and I was told that it would cost $130 per a wheel. I paid $31.99 for the Powerstop ones and they came with new retaining clips, the O’Reilly and Napa ones where shoes only in the box.

While having the truck on without the engine running I noted the voltage was low, the Thinkcar scanner shows real time voltage when connected, is was as low as 11.58v. So I added an onboard Noco2D charger, the truck does a lot of sitting, I have “Dad’s ski wagon”, a 2002 Subaru LL Bean Outback that keeps the mileage low on the truck.

 

Torque values from Alldata:

Rear brake caliper bracket bolt 221 ft lb, I cleaned the threads and add Loctite 242

Parking Brake Actuator Bolt 106 in lb (round up to 9 ft lb)

Parking Brake Actuator Splash Shield Replacement – Inner 16 ft lb

acuator_t40.jpg

oem_brake_shoes.jpg

right_parking_brake_actuator.jpg

Edited by digger86
  • Like 2
Posted

 Very good write up on EPB, parts, and replacing shoes.  Details and pics are important and appreciated for the average DIYer.  Thanks for the post!

Posted

Good writeup, my 2020 LTZ was done 3000 km ago, after market shoes, pretty much same story, dealer wanted $1500. My mechanic did it for just over $600.

Posted

Xy74, my parkbrake shoes separated from brake material, i had never used them and the bonding process let go. I wish supplier's would bring back brake material riveted to metal shoes.

Posted

An isolated flaw no doubt......... according to GM.  :)  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Progress... sort of.   Intake is disassembled, spider is out, fuel lines removed. Used a torch on the stripped screw with the lower intake off, much easier when I've got the intake sitting on my workbench, I made it talk. Walked right out with a pair of vice grips once it was nice and toasty hot.   New parts are piling up on my service cart waiting to be installed. Distributor, temperature sensor, new gaskets, fuel line kit, themostat, water neck.   My new pickle is I don't want to spend $600 on a replacement spider. I'm not sure IT is bad. I'm probably splitting hairs. Or it's $300 to send mine away and another 3 weeks of the truck just sitting. I have half a mind to assemble everything with the old spider to see if I can get away with just replacing the fuel pressure regulator to be safe. The obvious issue was the gushing high pressure fuel line which will be replaced. Getting to the spider really isn't that hard, and now I know what I'm doing , swapping it would be a breeze should it absolutely need one. Stupid, or smart?   The part that gives me pause is replacing the distributor. Well, it's already out. And I didn't mark it, whoopsie! Engine was at TDC when I removed it, I know that, so upon correct reinstall the metal tip on the rotor should point to the TDC mark on the distributor because that's where it was pointing on the old distributor. Worst case I'm a tooth off and have to re-stab it.   But then, what? I assume the truck will start. It doesn't appear the timing can be set. Here's the problem: These distributors can't be rotated but a degree or two, by design. What I read is Cam ****** needs to be -2 to +2 degrees, ideally at 0 (and checked/set above 1000 rpm). There should be enough wiggle to get that properly set, but checking the reported value is another potential issue. My Actron 9185 scanner says it supports enhanced GM PIDs and Cam ****** is one of them but it's unclear that I'll be able to correctly see it over OBD 1.5. I can see why people end up junking these things with life left in them. They're an absolute nightmare with tweener-year diagnostics/electronics and unobtanium parts.   Fingers crossed it starts and idles nicely. There can be hope, right? I'ma buy a lottery ticket the same day just in case.   Next steps..DO IT. I have not installed an intake before so I've been reading and watching a lot. Some say NO RTV except on china walls, some say DO RTV on water ports but not fuel/air intake. 1/4 or 3/8 bead on China walls? I think my strategy will be, obviously, RTV china walls with overlap on the gasket corners. Chapstick-style RTV the water ports. Leave intake ports dry. The only set of intake gaskets I could find locally are Edelbrock performance gaskets (uh...for an asthmatic 190hp V6? LOL) so we'll see how they do.   #NoToolLeftBehind. It took an hour, but my recovery mission for my deep 10mm socket was successful. It had rolled down the bellhousing and wedged itself between what I think are the fuel lines? I couldn't see it at all, but with a junk antenna I had laying around, I blindly went poking/sweeping for it, heard it clink, raised the truck, and caught a sliver glimpse of chrome with a flashlight way up there in Narnia. I had pushed it farther along the lines holding it captive, but within access of severely improvised tools, poking and cursing at it to finally knock it free to where I could get a fingertip on it to bring it home.    Not much to see.      
    • Thats crazy considering im right next door (Indiana)
    • For a limited time, retail and commercial accounts receive an AMSOIL Vinyl Tool Tray with their order of $500 or more when they use code TRAY726 at checkout. The promotion runs through July 21, 2026.   Order at https://syntheticadvantage.com   Want to use AMSOIL in your business or sell at your store, apply here.  https://www.amsoil.com/business-opportunities/?zo=521390  
    • It wouldn’t have happened if the government hadn’t mandated outrageous fuel mileage standards. It does very little for the consumer. It adds cost. Back during Covid there was a chip shortage. They gave a rebate for your truck if it didn’t have the chip to turn on cylinder deactivation. It was 50$ because at best you may see 1/2 a mile increase per gallon. Splitting hairs each fuel mileage trick wasn’t mandated. The government doesn’t do the engineering work and say use this until it’s already in use and they like it. The fuel mileage was mandated. And those add ons the results. There’s a mandate and they are the results.
    • It was never mandated.  Ever.    Automakers were incentivized to install it by getting CAFE credits to help with their vehicle fleet fuel economy scores.  They were being handed money/CAFE credits to install it.  Which is NOT a mandate.       The current admin removed the incentives that were behind them installing it.       
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...