Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Would an aluminum intake manifold heat soak and effect power?

 

I ask because I’m considering BTR’s truck intake manifold. It loses maybe 40 ft lbs in the mid range but gains 60 plus horsepower/torque up top out to 7000.

 

 

Posted

Anything metal will heatsoak, no way around that. Only way to cool the intake charge is with a intercooler or heat exchanger of some sort.

 

Ask yourself this though, how often are you riding that 5,000-7,000rpm rev range? Probably not very often, losing that 40ft/lbs is a lot in that 2,500-5,000rpm section, to me that's not worth it. Adding a camshaft to the engine that suits the proper torque converter would be a better idea to me.

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, CamGTP said:

Anything metal will heatsoak, no way around that. Only way to cool the intake charge is with a intercooler or heat exchanger of some sort.

 

Ask yourself this though, how often are you riding that 5,000-7,000rpm rev range? Probably not very often, losing that 40ft/lbs is a lot in that 2,500-5,000rpm section, to me that's not worth it. Adding a camshaft to the engine that suits the proper torque converter would be a better idea to me.


I am adding a btr 220 cam. And your right I spend very little time at peak rpm. But I’m looking for full throttle power.

Posted

I don't that that adding a camshaft is going to give up 40-60hp throughout the rev range if not more. The stock truck intakes are really good for torque.

Posted
6 hours ago, CamGTP said:

I don't that that adding a camshaft is going to give up 40-60hp throughout the rev range if not more. The stock truck intakes are really good for torque.


No, the camshaft doesn’t give up much, if any in the mid range. But the Btr truck intake manifold does.

 

Heres an example on an L8T. The third intake manifold in the graph is a short runner design and it gives up even more in the mid range.

 

 

IMG_0110.png

Posted
12 hours ago, M1ck3y said:

The cam does give up a bit below 2500…

 

I have that cam in my 2018. BTR makes quality stuff. With headers it added +100 hp and +80 torque. I don't notice the tiny loss of torque below 2500. After 2500 it takes off like a rocket. The idle chop sounds so good. Been trouble free for 30k km

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, SeekAndDestroy said:

 

I have that cam in my 2018. BTR makes quality stuff. With headers it added +100 hp and +80 torque. I don't notice the tiny loss of torque below 2500. After 2500 it takes off like a rocket. The idle chop sounds so good. Been trouble free for 30k km

 

Was that with e85 too? What Catback are you running? I need to change mine from Corsa Sport; its just too loud with headers.

Edited by M1ck3y
Posted
2 hours ago, M1ck3y said:

 

Was that with e85 too? What Catback are you running? I need to change mine from Corsa Sport; its just too loud with headers.


No, tuned for 91. E85 is hard to find here, only one station in the whole city has it. 
 

I have full custom exhaust. 1-3/4” Kooks headers, kooks y-pipe with high flow cats then it duals into 2.5” pipes with Dynomax mufflers. Loud AF. I’ve heard that the Magnaflow 12909 muffles headers good. 
 

This is the dyno sheet. They said it was a 4th gear pull, and it would have 5-7% more power if it was done in 6th.

 

IMG_0854.thumb.jpeg.49660627be24964522253dc2f16bf7e4.jpeg

Posted
6 hours ago, SeekAndDestroy said:


No, tuned for 91. E85 is hard to find here, only one station in the whole city has it. 
 

I have full custom exhaust. 1-3/4” Kooks headers, kooks y-pipe with high flow cats then it duals into 2.5” pipes with Dynomax mufflers. Loud AF. I’ve heard that the Magnaflow 12909 muffles headers good. 
 

This is the dyno sheet. They said it was a 4th gear pull, and it would have 5-7% more power if it was done in 6th.

 

IMG_0854.thumb.jpeg.49660627be24964522253dc2f16bf7e4.jpeg


yesh I was thinking I’d try magnaflow out. They have a single exit 4” with two mufflers.

 

Nice numbers. I’m getting my work done at the same place!

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, M1ck3y said:


yesh I was thinking I’d try magnaflow out. They have a single exit 4” with two mufflers.

 

Nice numbers. I’m getting my work done at the same place!


They are good. If you can afford it, get an aftermarket converter with a slightly higher stall than stock. The only issue I have is when I’m coming to a stop the cam will push through the brakes. Not every time, but it’s pretty sketchy on a slippery snow day

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, SeekAndDestroy said:


They are good. If you can afford it, get an aftermarket converter with a slightly higher stall than stock. The only issue I have is when I’m coming to a stop the cam will push through the brakes. Not every time, but it’s pretty sketchy on a slippery snow day

 

Yikes, I didn't think this cam was that aggressive. Looks like I'll have to be quick on shifting to neutral. Converter isn't in the cards. 

 

Do you know why Davenport didnt dyno in 6th? my under standing is the driveshaft is good until 125ish, was it your tires?

Edited by M1ck3y
Posted (edited)
On 5/16/2025 at 3:23 PM, CamGTP said:

Anything metal will heatsoak, no way around that. Only way to cool the intake charge is with a intercooler or heat exchanger of some sort.

 

Ask yourself this though, how often are you riding that 5,000-7,000rpm rev range? Probably not very often, losing that 40ft/lbs is a lot in that 2,500-5,000rpm section, to me that's not worth it. Adding a camshaft to the engine that suits the proper torque converter would be a better idea to me.

 

I've read that the air is moving so fast through the intake that it doesn't really have time to absorb any heat before it enters the cylinder. Is that true? I'm also wondering if you have any real world experience with an aluminum intake; did you notice higher iat's over a plastic one?

Edited by M1ck3y
Posted
2 hours ago, M1ck3y said:

 

Yikes, I didn't think this cam was that aggressive. Looks like I'll have to be quick on shifting to neutral. Converter isn't in the cards. 

 

Do you know why Davenport didnt dyno in 6th? my under standing is the driveshaft is good until 125ish, was it your tires?


It’s not very often, maybe once a month if the tranny downshifts funny. It’ll do one lurch forward. I just mash the brakes harder, lol. 
 

In 6th gear at 6100 RPM I’ll probably be going 180-200 Km/hr. The driveshaft might handle that RPM but the tires are not rated. Just safer for them to dyno it in 4th and do the math after. 

Posted
31 minutes ago, SeekAndDestroy said:


It’s not very often, maybe once a month if the tranny downshifts funny. It’ll do one lurch forward. I just mash the brakes harder, lol. 
 

In 6th gear at 6100 RPM I’ll probably be going 180-200 Km/hr. The driveshaft might handle that RPM but the tires are not rated. Just safer for them to dyno it in 4th and do the math after. 


makes sense. I just used a calculator to figure out the rpm vs speed. Looks like I’ll have to do a 3rd gear run with my heavy LT tires…

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...