Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

gm-3-0l-duramax-diesel-inline-six-silverado.jpg

Following up on the dealer reveal article from earlier this month, we were passed some details that dealers heard at their annual meeting a few weeks ago. 

 

I want to preface this by saying this is still unconfirmed, spotty intel.  BUT... Here is the breakdown of what we are hearing:

  • The 6.7L Rumor now seems unlikely: The gas engine lineup was confirmed to be a 5.7L and a 6.6L V8. No power figures yet, but it looks like Chevy is bringing back the iconic 350-cubic-inch displacement.

  • 1,000-Mile Range Duramax: A surprise detail- GM is targeting a staggering 1,000-mile driving range on a single tank for the light-duty 3.0L Duramax. What would that take to pull off?

I just published a full breakdown on the front page with a deeper dive into the fuel capacity math here:
https://www.gm-trucks.com/2027-chevy-silverado-leaks-5-7l-v8-1000-mile-range/

 

What does everyone think?

Posted

I think you are right with the 36-gallon tank. I see it as an option and not the standard. Just bragging rights for advertising to put out there.

  • Like 1
Posted

I had an 100 gal fuel tank in the bed with my diesel trucks. I could go forever except when I was pulling my tractor. Going long distances is great except when you have to pee. So you have to stop anyway. I usually toped off with fuel while I was there. Stretch my legs. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Loved my Square body’s with dual tanks. Then switched to Suburbans with 40 gallon tank. Almost cried when I bought my 08 and they didn’t offer the bigger tanks. We all don’t use our trucks for school kids and grocery shopping 

Posted

I have a 2021, 3.0 diesel and I love it.

I have 212,000 miles on it and it drives like it is brand new.

I would very much be interested in the 36 gallon tank.

Posted

If i could, I would do a 35 gal tank on my 2025.

With 1000 mile range, I can pick where i get fuel and where i stop to stretch.

Posted (edited)

All looks fantastic on paper, as they usually do! If they offered that engine to the aftermarket alongside the new truck, that would be fantastic, too. 

 

The bigger question is, can GM build this thing and make it RELIABLE? Based on their past 19 model year track record, I have serious doubts.

 

Side note - I have a '93 Ram W250 with a Cummins that has a 1,600+ mile range. The stock 30 gallon tank, plus I've got a small toolbox that is mostly fuel - 91 gallons to be exact. :)

 

1,600 is as far as I dare go. Theoretically I should be able to go 1,900 before it stops running.

Edited by Jsdirt
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,778
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    daveishi
    Newest Member
    daveishi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 906 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...