Jump to content

Which tire?

GAMark

By GAMark
in 6.6L Gas V8 (L8T)

 Share

Tires  

14 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Byrds8 Enthusiast

Byrds8

Posted
Posted

Currently have KO3's on my 2500 and love them. Less than 7K miles on them but they are quiet.

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

MORSNO
MORSNO

Of those three tires, I'd say the Bridgestone AT, I've had problems in the past with the original BFG AT and KO2.  Recently I've ran two sets of Cooper LTX AT3's and now went back to Michelin, you jus

GAMark
GAMark

The problem I have with Michelin is that they suck in most conditions off-road. And can share one story where I was running them pulled off to read a map, yes, I am that old, and the tires would not m

MORSNO
MORSNO

I hear you!  A good All Terrain (AT) tire works best for most people, Michelin makes an AT tire, but it's pretty mellow.  That is why I switched to the Cooper AT3 LTX tires.  I did have one fail in th

Posted Images

GAMark Enthusiast

GAMark

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The main reason I did not run the KO3 is the siping is only halfway through the tread blocks. And drive in too much rain. 

GAMark Enthusiast

GAMark

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
On 5/2/2026 at 6:29 PM, Chuck FB said:

There must be something quite different about the rubber compound then if at slow speed you can notice quite a difference in wet traction from the Goodyear to the Bridgestone. I've read in the last few years about the comparison between the ATW3 ( I do own a set on another pickup but have not had enough varying conditions to make claims other than they seem fine driving down the highway so far ) and the BFG KO2 comparison, that the KO2 was not good in the wet for traction and has hydroplaning issues due to its tread block design that did not evacuate water well. That does surprise me that the ATW3 was not working out so well as for what its worth I certainly saw a lot of positive comments about that tire and my multi brand tire dealer highly suggested the Falken for my use due to some gravel use over the KO2 for sure but also the Toyo AT3. 

 

What did you do with the factory Goodyear tires, hang onto them or let them go cheap at the tire dealer.

I agree, it must be a better compound. The difference is not subtle, either at low speeds on boat ramps or on my steep driveway. The Goodyear would spin and then gain some traction, and the Bridgestone do not. Before this truck, I had AT3W, and they would also spin. I am sure many are better in the dirt, but that is not my use case. 

Edited by GAMark
  • Like 1
Chuck FB Enthusiast

Chuck FB

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, GAMark said:

I agree, it must be a better compound. The difference is not subtle, either at low speeds on boat ramps or on my steep driveway. The Goodyear would spin, and the Bridgestone would not. Before this truck, I had AT3W, and they would also spin. I am sure many are better in the dirt, but that is not my use case. 

 

Back when I bought the AT3W for a different truck and got some input from more than one tire dealers on their tire thoughts, one of the dealers had a KO2, Toyo AT3 and Falken AT3W lined up side by side in the showroom as they do work mostly on pickups and those are three popular tires that an independent shop can get their hands on to sell. It was the difference and was at room temperature of the three tires compounds. The KO2 and Toyo felt very similar with the squeeze test of the tread blocks but the Falken felt quite a bit firmer, it was very noticeable. Tire reviews aside as per winter traction, I wasn't that concerned about that since I was not planning on running them much during the winter anyway although some claim the AT3W was not a bad all terrain choice for winter, none will ever be as good as a dedicated winter tire with studs. 

 

As per use case, I imagine around you as well you might see guys running mud tires on rigs that are too fancy to be going off road but it looks cool in the mall parking lot !. Mud tires are not noted for their best on road traction ( never mind winter/ice conditions ) or handling or rolling resistance or being a quiet ride, or last near as long either. 

asilverblazer Senior Enthusiast

asilverblazer

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Chuck FB said:

 

Back when I bought the AT3W for a different truck and got some input from more than one tire dealers on their tire thoughts, one of the dealers had a KO2, Toyo AT3 and Falken AT3W lined up side by side in the showroom as they do work mostly on pickups and those are three popular tires that an independent shop can get their hands on to sell. It was the difference and was at room temperature of the three tires compounds. The KO2 and Toyo felt very similar with the squeeze test of the tread blocks but the Falken felt quite a bit firmer, it was very noticeable...

 

As per use case, I imagine around you as well you might see guys running mud tires on rigs that are too fancy to be going off road but it looks cool in the mall parking lot !. Mud tires are not noted for their best on road traction ( never mind winter/ice conditions ) or handling or rolling resistance or being a quiet ride, or last near as long either. 

The Falken AT3W has me intrigued, looks similar to the KO2 tread pattern.

PBNB Enthusiast

PBNB

Posted
Posted

I went with the Falken AT4W when we got the truck, they were quiet and smooth for about a year then we got the howling from the front. I just rotated them so hopefully that will wear the them a bit more evenly.

 

For balancing, check out Centramatics balancers in addition to getting the wheels balanced. 

 

I find the Falkens to be heavy even compared to the Toyo AT3's I had on the Tundra. For more road use, I would consider something with a bit less lug.

Chuck FB Enthusiast

Chuck FB

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, PBNB said:

I went with the Falken AT4W when we got the truck, they were quiet and smooth for about a year then we got the howling from the front. I just rotated them so hopefully that will wear the them a bit more evenly.

 

For balancing, check out Centramatics balancers in addition to getting the wheels balanced. 

 

I find the Falkens to be heavy even compared to the Toyo AT3's I had on the Tundra. For more road use, I would consider something with a bit less lug.

Depending on size it seems but comparing the ATW4 to the KO3, there isn't that much weight difference at least in the tire I was comparing but your right that the Toyo AT3 is somewhat lighter as are a few other all terrain tires as well. I haven't put enough miles on my Falken AT3W set to have much wear or a chance to have vibration etc so the jury is out yet on them from my limited experience, they seem fairly quiet although not silent. 

Chuck FB Enthusiast

Chuck FB

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, asilverblazer said:

The Falken AT3W has me intrigued, looks similar to the KO2 tread pattern.

 

The AT3W is probably not made in any size now unless there is old stock around as not long after I bought mine they started the switch to the AT4W. The KO2 has that funky shoulder block with that wedge/slit shape groove and that area of the tread seems horrible for retaining rocks that won't come out at highway speed although it spots out a lot of rocks once off of the gravel and onto the pavement and throwing rocks when on the gravel. Mind you the AT3W certainly picks some rocks as well but didn't seem as bad at least on the gravel I drive on vs the KO2. KO3, good question as I haven't been around them to see what they seem like for rock retention or how they are carcass wise if one was doing a certain amount of gravel driving. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Chuck FB
      Fluid Change Questions

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I know when I was looking around last year to see if someone handled Amsoil gear oil to buy at the retail level which of course means full price. I found an independent shop that works a lot on GM/Duramax pickups and they did not bring in the 75W-85 as they just stuck to the 75W-90 for the front and rear as a standard practice for the HD trucks which makes sense anyway for the higher hp/torque diesel and pulling heavy loads in four wheel drive. I haven't changed my diff oils yet but still plan on using the 75W-85 for the front diff as I highly doubt I will be beating on the truck and figured for my use type the bit thinner oil would be to my benefit for the winter for that slightly less drag. Very different weather here all winter vs northern Washington near the coast, that's for sure. 
    • Chuck FB
      Oil Consumption

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      Ok that confirms the extra quart theme they are still going with which must mean they have noted some initial use more so then some engines and probably the bigger factor in all of this probably isn't the engine so much as its the insane distance or OLM that lulls a lot of the driving public into driving their new vehicle off the lot and not even doing one short interval oil change because the manufacturer doesn't say different and if the dealer follows that logic as well. Selling the rarely needing to be serviced concept seems to go over well with the public that wants to get away with as little as possible for dollars spent on the vehicles maintenance and I bet there are 3.0 engines just like other vehicles out there that never have their oil checked by the owner which goes back to why they probably felt the need to add that extra quart to avoid a costly theme.    Speaking of cutting filters open, it was probably over two years ago now that a youtuber who buys vehicles to do longer term reviews and pulls a fifth wheel through the mountains of Colorado on summer trips and that becomes part of the testing. Anyway he had a GM HD with the 6.6 gas and a Ford 250 with the 7.3 gas at the same time and of no surprise the Ford had more power etc but somewhere along the way in the few thousand miles he put on the truck, he changed the oil and was seeing glitter and cut open the filter and yeah, things were not looking spectacular. The truck about that time or soon after seemed down on power compared to what it had been and then threw some engine code, I expect the cam/lifters were failing and so he brought the truck back to the dealer and made some deal to get out of it as he knew it would sit for months waiting on a new engine as they were so backlogged at the time. He kept the GM for some time after that using it exclusively until he sold it after buying his next vehicle to do a review on. Definitely the filter can tell a story when things are starting to go sideways, but it would be a sickening feeling to cut it open and be faced with an ugly mess like that and be running a magnet through the pleats and the oil on the dirty side of the filter and see all the fines sticking to the magnet.    The dealer may have some ideas based on experience as to where that coolant smell is coming from, I would imagine if they can't find it but its smelling they would put dye in it to they could give it a run cycle and use the black light to see where it pops up, if its a hose connection, water pump, rad or even a head gasket etc. 
    • riddler
      Torsion adjustment

      By riddler · Posted

      Good looking truck, suspensionmaxx looks like a solid option
    • riddler
      Torsion adjustment

      By riddler · Posted

      Thanks for the info, im considering a leveling kit or 4" lift kit.
    • davester
      frustrating P0446 code

      By davester · Posted

      charm.li (website) has the vehicle-specific diagnostic procedure for that code, you can use to find what the cause of it is.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...