Jump to content

95 or 99 Tahoe Differences


Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm looking for some advice. Original plan was to buy a 98 or 99 Tahoe/Sub/Yuk/YukXL to haul the family and boat until I found a 95 Yukon with only 65K and in better shape than most 99. My question the 95 has a 5.7L and the 96-99 have 5.7L Vortec, what's the difference?

 

If my source is correct here is the hp and lb-ft difference:

95: 200 hp, 310 lb-ft of torque

96: 250 hp, 325 lb-ft of torque

97-99: 255 hp, 330 lb-ft of torque

 

It looks like the Vortex gets a little better gas mileage, 2 mpg? Probably easier to get parts for the Vortec?

 

What about the autotrack all-wheel drive that was available in 99, does that make a difference?

 

From a safety stand point the 95 had a drivers side airbag while a passenger airbag showed up in 97?

 

Any differences I'm missing?

Thanks,

Brent

Posted

The '95 5.7L uses a TBI (Throttle Body Injection) unit for fuel delivery. In '96 it was replaced by the Vortec which uses Multiport injection, and is more efficient, thus more horsies and torque. The '95 uses 1 O2 sensor, '96 and up uses 4 and also uses OBDII which can be "tuned" more easily.( ex. Westers or Hypertec hand held type devices) The '95 uses OBDI which would require you to change the PROM ( computer chip ). The Vortec series is also more fuel efficient. But the '95 and older engines are a little more Do It Yourselfer freindly for the backyard mechanic, if you are into that sort of thing. Both engines are durable and long lasting when maintained properly (my '95 has over 185k mi on it) But the newer engines give you a little more BANG for your buck$

 

I'm not that familiar with the Auto-Trac 4wd system other than it's a computer controlled All Wheel Drive system that improves handling in poor traction conditions. If you do a search on this site I'm pretty sure you will find a better explanation and its pro's and cons.

 

Hope this helps a little

Posted

Not much diff in gas mileage..my 94 gets about the same as my dad's 97 Vortec.

I drove his and to be honest , after putting headers,intake and exhaust on my 94...I'm not sure which runs better.

Mine seems to have more torque but, his has more HP.

I can also tell you if the mileage is that low for a 95...it's been settin' a little while and not driven much which means...check it over good.

Both will have issues with the intake manifold gaskets but, that's just the nature of the design with no gaskets on the front or back valley.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hey everyone, I recently had an issue with my 07 2500HD GMT900. My DRL’s stay on at all times. Right front turn and right mirror turn signal indicator stay on solid at all times. By “at all times” I mean the only way to make them go off is disconnecting the battery. I tore the headlight assemblies out, tried disconnecting the harnesses to eliminate bad wiring at the harness, I unplugged the headlight switch, no change and the mirror turn signal still stayed on. My first thoughts were : Bad bulb and/or socket somewhere, under hood fuse panel bad, bcm bad, tail light or trailer wiring problem, or some random short to power in the harness.  Possibly a bad ground but unlikely. I had a big clue in the fuse panel, it had a burnt smell. I started pulling every fuse that had to do with DRL or right turn/park lamp. Nothing made the right directional turn off but pulling the DRL2 fuse made the DRL’s go out.  After studying wiring diagrams, I found that both problems had that fuse panel in common, the bcm also controls both problems but knowing the fuse panel had a burnt smell I removed and disassembled the fuse panel and found a little corrosion on the printed circuit board.  I ordered a new fuse panel from Amazon for like $260. When it arrived I installed it, and put everything back together, the problem was fixed. I figured the fuse panel needed to be replaced anyway so that was a logical place to start. Hopefully this story helps someone in the future. Regretfully I didn’t scan for codes before I did everything.
    • That stinks. I’m sitting on the side of the road right now with the same issue. Never had an issue before taking it in for the ground strap recall. Now I’m outside of warranty and they’ll probably want $200 just to diagnose what they already “fixed”. 
    • I wonder kind of nuts and bolts they will come up with next? Jim
    • “It should be recognized, however, that there becomes a point where fuel economy oils do not make much economic sense for the end consumer—we talk about a fuel saving of ~€100 compared to a risk of €1000 Euros if the oil is too thin and causes increased engine wear rates. However, the benefit of these oils accrues to the car manufacturers. If their vehicles can save 1–2% fuel by using a special fuel economy lubricant, then that OEM can drastically reduce the amount of fines they need to pay.”   I liked this and the following paragraph as well but it’s really only touching the beginning of the benefits OEMs see from spec’ing these oils. After you factor in “out of warranty” service work and new car sales when these engines fail before their time, it’s a good racket for them. Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you!
    • Too much voodoo and snake oil.   Time to go EV    😉
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...