Jump to content

Odometer


Recommended Posts

Posted

Recently I bought a gps an notice that the odometer of my 99 burb 2500 is faulse. when the odometer indicate 49 mph the gps indicate 55. I try the experience an my 2005 montana and they both indicate the same speed. I don't bought my truck new so could it be possible that the ratio diff. have been change and if so, what kind of ratio have I ? I know that the truck came alive whit a 4.10.

Thanks

Posted
Recently I bought a gps an notice that the odometer of my 99 burb 2500 is faulse. when the odometer indicate 49 mph the gps indicate 55. I try the experience an my 2005 montana and they both indicate the same speed. I don't bought my truck new so could it be possible that the ratio diff. have been change and if so, what kind of ratio have I ? I know that the truck came alive whit a 4.10.

Thanks

Tires are the same size as original LT245-75-16

Posted
Recently I bought a gps an notice that the odometer of my 99 burb 2500 is faulse. when the odometer indicate 49 mph the gps indicate 55. I try the experience an my 2005 montana and they both indicate the same speed. I don't bought my truck new so could it be possible that the ratio diff. have been change and if so, what kind of ratio have I ? I know that the truck came alive whit a 4.10.

Thanks

 

What is your VIN?

Posted

If you have the same transmission, transfer case, and tires as factory original then I'd guess you have a 3.73 rearend.

 

My math may be conceptually off here, but a 3.73 gear will make one revolution about 10% faster than a 4.10 ((4.10/3.73)-1) at the same rate of speed. Therefore, if your speedometer were calibrated for a 4.10 rearend and the only variable that changed in your driveline was your rearend ratio, then a 3.73 rearend would make your actual speed about 10% faster than was indicated on your speedometer. In your case, 10% of 49 =4.9 and 4.9+49=54. That's pretty close considering speedo and GPS measurement error.

 

Or, maybe your gauge cluster was swapped?

Posted

I think your wright silverado, but can the rear end gear may have been change whit out changing the casing ? notice here that is a C2500 2X4. So I thing that is an important thing to know because I haul a trailer and GM permitte to haul on the overdrive whit a 2500. I suppose that's because of the tranny and the 4.10 diff. Am I wright ?

Posted

This is what was from the factory:

 

XHH TIRE FRONT LT245/75R16/E BW R/PE ST TL ALS 120Q

YHH TIRE REAR LT245/75R16/E BW R/PE ST TL ALS 120Q

ZHH TIRE SPARE LT245/75R16/E BW R/PE ST TL ALS 120Q

QIZ TIRE ALL LT245/75R16/E BW R/PE ST TL ALS 120Q

MT1 TRANSMISSION AUTO 4 SPD, HMD, 4L80-E

U19 SPEEDOMETER INST, KILO & MILES, KILO ODOMETER

GT5 AXLE REAR 4.10 RATIO

G80 AXLE POSITRACTION LIMITED SLIP

 

Posted
So in non-technical terms is the GPS incorrect or the truck?

 

Probably a mix of the two...+/- 2 mph for each is reasonable, which could equal your discrepancy.

Posted
I think your wright silverado, but can the rear end gear may have been change whit out changing the casing ? notice here that is a C2500 2X4. So I thing that is an important thing to know because I haul a trailer and GM permitte to haul on the overdrive whit a 2500. I suppose that's because of the tranny and the 4.10 diff. Am I wright ?

I don't think it would be a problem going from a 4.10 to a 3.73 without changing the casing, since the 3.73 gear is smaller. Going the other way, though, may require a bigger casing. I'm purely speculating because I don't have firsthand experience with doing a swap, though.

 

As far as being able to tow in OD, I don't think the gearing in your rear differential is going to have any bearing on whether they recommend towing in OD or not. GM created the tow/haul mode which ups your line pressures and such and I haven't heard of GM truck owner's manuals specifically recommending you not tow in OD; I may have to check mine when I get off work.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So, GMCustomerService:  Judging by the Update History pictured above, is this truck missing any updates that it actually needs. If it's just for the infotainment system, the radio is working fine and no trouble with SeriusXM. and Android Auto is working fine wirelessly with my phone. Some months ago, an update notice was sent to my truck. I approved the update and it finished saying that the update was successful, but it seems that whatever that update was, it didn't actually get installed - at least not if I'm to go by the Update History shown above.   So, again, are there any updates that this truck really should have? I've checked with my dealer but they're reluctant or commit to anything and if I want them to check, they require a $200.00 fee just to check it out and then I'd have to pay for the actual update(s).    Ignorance is bliss, and if none of the updates goes to fixing any mechanical discrepancies, I'll just leave things as is.  
    • Hey everyone, I recently had an issue with my 07 2500HD GMT900. My DRL’s stay on at all times. Right front turn and right mirror turn signal indicator stay on solid at all times. By “at all times” I mean the only way to make them go off is disconnecting the battery. I tore the headlight assemblies out, tried disconnecting the harnesses to eliminate bad wiring at the harness, I unplugged the headlight switch, no change and the mirror turn signal still stayed on. My first thoughts were : Bad bulb and/or socket somewhere, under hood fuse panel bad, bcm bad, tail light or trailer wiring problem, or some random short to power in the harness.  Possibly a bad ground but unlikely. I had a big clue in the fuse panel, it had a burnt smell. I started pulling every fuse that had to do with DRL or right turn/park lamp. Nothing made the right directional turn off but pulling the DRL2 fuse made the DRL’s go out.  After studying wiring diagrams, I found that both problems had that fuse panel in common, the bcm also controls both problems but knowing the fuse panel had a burnt smell I removed and disassembled the fuse panel and found a little corrosion on the printed circuit board.  I ordered a new fuse panel from Amazon for like $260. When it arrived I installed it, and put everything back together, the problem was fixed. I figured the fuse panel needed to be replaced anyway so that was a logical place to start. Hopefully this story helps someone in the future. Regretfully I didn’t scan for codes before I did everything.
    • That stinks. I’m sitting on the side of the road right now with the same issue. Never had an issue before taking it in for the ground strap recall. Now I’m outside of warranty and they’ll probably want $200 just to diagnose what they already “fixed”. 
    • I wonder kind of nuts and bolts they will come up with next? Jim
    • “It should be recognized, however, that there becomes a point where fuel economy oils do not make much economic sense for the end consumer—we talk about a fuel saving of ~€100 compared to a risk of €1000 Euros if the oil is too thin and causes increased engine wear rates. However, the benefit of these oils accrues to the car manufacturers. If their vehicles can save 1–2% fuel by using a special fuel economy lubricant, then that OEM can drastically reduce the amount of fines they need to pay.”   I liked this and the following paragraph as well but it’s really only touching the beginning of the benefits OEMs see from spec’ing these oils. After you factor in “out of warranty” service work and new car sales when these engines fail before their time, it’s a good racket for them. Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...