Jump to content

Mpg Gains After Black Bear Tune Poll


Recommended Posts

Posted

I would like to take a Poll to find out what kind of MPG gains/losses you experienced after your Black Bear Performance tune. When you state your MPG gains or losses, also state which tune you went with and whether you switched grades of fuel after your tune.

 

For example a reply could look like:

 

I got the "87 octane" BB tune and it gave me a 2MPG fuel economy boost using 87 octane fuel before and after the tune.

 

or

 

I got the "93 octane" BB tune and it gave me a 4MPG fuel economy boost using 93 octane fuel. but I was using 87 octane before the BB tune.

 

Thanks, Jim

Posted

I don't have a truck that got tuned...but Justin did my Cadillac.

Premium is recommended by my owners manual but it states that you can use regular but you may lose some performance or mileage.

I have always ran Premium in it except for a few instances on road trips ...just to test how it ran on Regular.

 

It runs crappy and loses about 2 to 3 mpg on Regular, even on road trips, so I really can't compare to regular being used on an everyday basis.

 

Justin tuned it to run on Premium.

I gained about 1.5 to 2 mpg on a recent trip from Fort Worth TX to Florida and back.

The last road trip...last weekend was only a little over 600 miles...but about 2 mpg better than it used to get before being tuned.

 

My usual speed on the open road..traffic permitting of course...is 80/85.

 

I will add that I would get the premium tune again, even if I got -0- mpg increase.

It drives so much better and is more responsive in normal driving, that in my opinion, it would be worth the extra cost in fuel of Regular vs Premium.

Posted
I don't have a truck that got tuned...but Justin did my Cadillac.

Premium is recommended by my owners manual but it states that you can use regular but you may lose some performance or mileage.

I have always ran Premium in it except for a few instances on road trips ...just to test how it ran on Regular.

 

It runs crappy and loses about 2 to 3 mpg on Regular, even on road trips, so I really can't compare to regular being used on an everyday basis.

 

Justin tuned it to run on Premium.

I gained about 1.5 to 2 mpg on a recent trip from Fort Worth TX to Florida and back.

The last road trip...last weekend was only a little over 600 miles...but about 2 mpg better than it used to get before being tuned.

 

My usual speed on the open road..traffic permitting of course...is 80/85.

 

Thanks all information on this subject is welcome.

 

Jim

Posted

Cujo8,

 

Just finishing up another road trip today.

About 3,000 miles.

 

Mileage has varied from tank to tank, of course. That is to be expected.

But overall, it seems to be about 1 mpg to 1.5mpg better than before the tune.

 

But the MPG increase is really not the best part, it the way it runs and performs now.

Just thought I would add the latest info.

Posted

The gas stations must be switching over to summer blend or that in combo with 50 degree weather has caused my mileage to spike to record levels for my everyday commute. Been averaging 15.7-16mpg a tank this winter, and I now just went 150 miles on just over a quarter of a tank. :thumbs:

Posted
The gas stations must be switching over to summer blend or that in combo with 50 degree weather has caused my mileage to spike to record levels for my everyday commute. Been averaging 15.7-16mpg a tank this winter, and I now just went 150 miles on just over a quarter of a tank. :thumbs:

 

I bet you left the bear at home though. That extra 500lbs. can really hurt your MPG's.

Posted
The gas stations must be switching over to summer blend or that in combo with 50 degree weather has caused my mileage to spike to record levels for my everyday commute. Been averaging 15.7-16mpg a tank this winter, and I now just went 150 miles on just over a quarter of a tank. :)

 

I bet you left the bear at home though. That extra 500lbs. can really hurt your MPG's.

 

+1

Posted

I haven't seen any MPG gains from my BB Tune. Driving the same routes, style, weather conditions, etc. it's about the same.

 

But those first few tanks after the tune were way down. That Justin is a HACK

 

:)

Posted
I haven't seen any MPG gains from my BB Tune. Driving the same routes, style, weather conditions, etc. it's about the same.

 

But those first few tanks after the tune were way down. That Justin is a HACK

 

:)

You need to drink more Kool-aid!

Posted
I haven't seen any MPG gains from my BB Tune. Driving the same routes, style, weather conditions, etc. it's about the same.

 

But those first few tanks after the tune were way down. That Justin is a HACK

 

:)

You need to drink more Kool-aid!

 

 

:D

  • 11 months later...
Posted

6.0 Before 11.5 and after 13 all city. Have not had the opportunity to test it on the highway without 30 foot of camper being towed. So, I dont know what the mpg would be on the highway.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a 2018 Silverado Custom with 156k on the odometer. In the last month I've replaced the plugs, wires and the driver side engine mount. My wife just returned from a trip of about 1500 miles and told me the brakes are making a grinding noise when applied. I drove it and looked it over and this is what I found with the driver's side rear rotor.   I'm going to order new pads and check about having the rotor resurfaced. Hopefully this is easier than the last 2 jobs.   Peace  
    • Any update if the new valve cover help with the oil consumption?  I have a 2014 GMC sierra and my truck is consuming a lot of oil so I’m wondering if replacing the driver side valve cover will stop some of the oil consumption. Thanks 
    • I bought belts and pulleys for my '20 L5P at Rock Auto a couple years ago. I have used them for many years, and almost always save significant money, especially when I buy maintenance stuff ahead of time.   They carry many OEM parts, which is all I use unless an aftermarket is shown to be same/superior, or if it is an insignificant part or unavailable OEM part anywhere else. RA is usually lower priced, often by a bunch, but parts are sometimes unavailable or out of stock, and I do shop around and sometimes find better prices at other sites.   Be aware that you pay shipping, and if you buy multiple items and they are coming from different warehouses, the shipping can kill the advantage. Planning ahead is best if possible.   If you have a transmission service in the near future, check out their OEM (AC Delco ULV) fluid, usually MUCH less than anywhere else.
    • New member here, very long time occasional guest. Saw this thread, thought it would be a good time to contribute someting. It is only my experience and not a claim that everyone will have the same.   I bought my '20 3500 L5P new and have put 99.9% (literally) of it's current ~400k miles on it myself, with over 50% of that towing loads between 4k to 15k, and to me this truck has been nothing short of amazing. For the first 235k I had zero issues, and from there until 321k I replaced a NOx sensor, two failing glow plugs, and three of the notorious injector connectors. I believe this truck is in part, a testament to good luck, but also good care and following a decent maintenance schedule (I also keep meticulous records.) As a result, it looks as good as a well cared for 70k rig, up and down, inside and out.   At some point before that 321k mile mark I began to get a little spooked about the 10L1000, especially the valve body. Word of mouth about potential issues prompted me to jump on the net to sift through all the noise and determine what all the fuss was about. I routinely take long trips, coast-to-coast and points in between, so roadside breakdowns can be '...a thousand miles from nowhere' and a bit of a challenge, and though I had no issues, my guard was up and activated.   And then I stumbled across a chance to salvage some parts off a new 2025 that had been wrecked in transport. I grabbed a few wear items (alternator, pulleys, etc.) and on a whim asked what the ten speeder would cost me. It was cheap...really cheap. I knew some changes had been made in the '24+ version 10L and were supposedly not compatible, but I called service/parts at my local Chevy dealer and asked why and they didn't know. A call to a well known aftermarket transmission outfit revealed it was very likely it would be fine, but to them not 100% sure.   Because it was cheap (really cheap) and I was spooked, I took the chance. Had it installed by a local shop and it worked like a champ, shifted just like the original. At it's first service at 37k, I had the shop put in a Next Gen valve body kit, which after some initial hiccups and rough shifts, smoothed out though with somewhat firmer shifting.   All that said, I have a very serious concern about my newer transmission as just two weeks ago it suddenly began to exhibit a strong reluctance to engage forward or reverse. It was a bit past due anyway so I took it in for service. The reason it was sticking was due to 'glitter' in the fluid clogging the filter...not good folks, often indicates a converter giving out. We ended up going ahead with the new filter and fluid, first to see if it would move and shift, and then if so buy me a little time. It did, and I've driven it over a thousand miles and it is shifting smooth, no noises or slipping. Regardless, it looks like a third gearbox is in my future so I can resume taking long trips with some confidence. In the very short term, my curiosity will have me examining the fluid to check how much glitter has reappeared.   An earlier poster had alleged, in the context of 10L100 failures, that it is another example of how we seasoned citizens somehow descend into hysteria, lose control of our senses, and react irrationally after brief encounters with the idiocy of the internet infosphere. Let me say (and I have used and abused said internet since it's infancy) there is no segment of the populace that has a corner on over-reaction to digital garbage. Just as my offering of experience in this arena is purely anecdotal and should not be considered gospel or all-encompassing, I believe it is still worthwhile information to consider, along with other relevant anecdotal experiences about things like complex transmissions, especially when balanced with other sources.   So to answer the original question, yes I got high miles out of my first 10L, trouble free for 321,000. Now I really wonder how much longer it would have went. Did I 'overreact' to the internet ghouls by replacing a 'good' one with a 'bad' one? Maybe. Who knows, the thing might have taken a puke a 100 miles later. So I'll just fix it again, then move on and start thinking about all the other stuff that will eventually wear out. It still has the original brakes (they're at ~60%), original injectors/pump, turbo, water pump, etc....pretty much original everything. Knock on wood.
    • At peak temperature.  They get to cool down and warm up more, especially those with the external cooler.  I have three GMT900s and one of them has over 225K on its original transmission.  Fluid gets changed about every 36K miles, all of it.     It's not the bean counters, it was the government.  They had to meet CAFE standards and other government requirements.   To get around that, we tune them and modify them to our liking.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...