Jump to content

Coldstart Problems On E85


Recommended Posts

Posted

Here´s my problem....truck got 2400ls/3800km on it....the first three fillups were premium and when it was empty I switched to E85...I´ve been using E85 the last six fillups without any problems...

Today we had 99F/37C here so I used the remote starter to cool her down a bit inside...what happened was, on the first startup cycle the engine was running for less than a second and then it died...I started her again and everything was normal. Must admitt I noticed some kind of strange behaviour the last few times I started her in the morning. But today the engine needed two starts to run...

Anything I should worry about? Or is that some kind of a normal behaviour when using only E85? :thumbs:

Any help appreciated.

Posted

Her Impala was doing this. She'd been running E85 for a while.

 

Started requiring 2 starts after a weekend. Then every morning. The mechanic said this was common in Fords. The fuel pump impeller would swell with EtOH. But he'd never seen a Chevy like that.

 

Long story we went back to regular fuel. Fixed the problem within a few days. I am a big ethanol fan but it seemed to fix the cold start problem. Never have noticed this with my truck though.

 

Good luck! Keep us up to date!!

Posted
No probs last two times...I guess she had just a bad day :lol:

 

Thanks anyway Nick

 

Well her Impala started only doing this after a long weekend of sitting. It progressively got more and more frequent.

 

Keep your eyes out and let us know what/if you find. :cool:

Posted

Ran E85 in my truck all winter here. Have been running my Tajoe with it the last 2 with no start up issues

Posted

isen't there some sort of relearn procedure that most people neglect to do when switching between e85 and regular? i think i read that on this forum some where

Posted
isen't there some sort of relearn procedure that most people neglect to do when switching between e85 and regular? i think i read that on this forum some where

 

The relearn procedure is only when switching fuels. And it's basically just drive for 7 miles or something like that.

 

Like I said above, my mechanic said this is very common on Ford engines. He had a fuel pump in a bucket and showed me what the deal was.

 

My truck never had this problem and her car was running E85 for 2 years or so before noticing this. :lol:

Posted
isen't there some sort of relearn procedure that most people neglect to do when switching between e85 and regular? i think i read that on this forum some where

 

 

 

 

 

 

I am going to start a little thread on E-85 compatible vehicle refueling and hope on of the admin's will pinn it. The refuel info should be in your owners manual but I'm going to explain why. Improper fueling events cause hard starts, missfires, rich or lean codes and in extreme conditions can cause a no start. As a technician I have seen a bunch of problems created by improper fueling. If a tech hasn't been burned by it a few times checking your content may be last on his list creating comebacks and unhappy customers. This applies to all GM E-85 compatible vehicles built 2005 to present and a few built before that, they all use the same refueling procedure.

The first GM vehicles that were E-85 compatible used a fuel content sensor that measured fuel content as it was being used. This was a very efficent way to measure content but the sensor also needed to be a computer to do some major calculating on the fly. As a result they were about $400 a piece. GM decided to go the way of most other manufacturers to cut costs and do away with the sensor and go to a learn algorithm. It is very efficent as long as refueling is done properly. I wish we would make salespeople go over the procedure to head problems off at the pass but that's another story alltogeather.

 

First let me (try) to explain a little about what the vehicle is doing. When refueling has occoured the PCM or ECM depending on vehicle basically says "we have new fuel" and for the next few miles (distances vary but I'll give you the recommended later) it starts adjusting fuel injector rates and spark timing and watches what happens based on a few of the sensors and uses some crazy math to figure out what is being burned. Lets say you have half a tank of E-10 and add 1\4 tank of E-85, the vehicle sees that since the last drive cycle there has been a 25% increase in fuel volume. It starts varying, watching and calculating and eventually will come up with a tank content of something like E-40 (I know someone is checking my math, don't bother it's just an example I know its not accurate). The vehicle is not measuring what is in the tank it is measuring the difference of what it knew was there and what it calculates was put in. If it gets one calculation wrong every fill after that will be exponentially wrong as well. If it thinks it's burning E-10 and it actually is burning E-40, since the volitility is different there will be problems.

 

On to refueling events. In order for the PCM to watch for one and then adjust for it some things MUST happen. First the key MUST be off. This is a good practice for all vehicles not just E-85 compatible. With the key on evap testing may happen and obviously with the cap off the vehicle will see a large leak, as I'm sure many of you know this gives you a check engine lamp on a vehicle that may be perfectly fine. I'ts especially critical on E-85 vehicles because of the prementioned way the PCM is doing calculations. I know the kids like the radio on and you want to listen to the rest of that song or the ball game, so do I, but you shouldn't. Next the fuel level change must be 3 gallons or more, I recommend more just to take slightly wrong fuel level sensors out of the equation (that gives me another idea, why using top tier fuel protects that sensitive level sensor). Finally The vehicle must be given enough time to make the calculations, our data says and I quote "usually by the time 7 miles of operating temperature driving has been completed" so it's not the same every time it's just a guideline. Basically don't go to the gas station a block away while the vehicle is cold and go to the store 2 blocks from the station the new fuel will not be learned and it will not pick up where it left off, once the learn drive cycle is done it is done. The vehicle needs to be in closed loop for any adjustments to be made and closed loop doesn't happen in the first few minutes of any given drive cycle. Once in closed loop it will take a few minutes for all of the calculations and fine tuning to complete.

 

You may be asking why not just calculate it all the time and do away with the refueling events? Simple answer, it's not efficent, fuel mileage would suffer and it takes quite a toll on processing or so we are told, sounds viable to me and I couldn't change it if it were not so why bother asking why. If the calculated content is wrong it goes something like this. Vehicle comes in and the complaint makes me think fuel quality or content might be an issue. I use the Tech-2 to look at what the PCM has calculated it to be, then take a fuel sample and visually check for water and impurities then I check the actual content. If it is more than 15% off then the tank MUST be dropped down, emptied and dried out and an initial refuel event needs to be done. If that fuel is not E-10 or E-85 it must be disposed of. Using a blend like E-40 for a refuel will not work, you just lost 25 gallons of gas. So to sum it up refuel correctly.

 

  • TURN THE KEY OFF

     

  • USE MORE THAN 3 GALLONS

     

  • DRIVE 7 MILES OR MORE

     

 

This all is not an issue if you never ever from the first mile ever use anything different but if you use something different one time proper refueling needs to be done from that point on.

Posted

I've had the same thing happen to my truck, but I don't run E85. I believe it has to do something with the remote start. It has happened a hand full of times over the past two years. It only happens with the remote start. It does not happen when I start with the ignition. It doesn't happen enough for me to bother looking at it further. It may be a coincidence that it happened with the E85.

 

Al

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • If all oil manufacturers had to meet a higher standard for not just the initial filtering of the oil but that they had to improve on their formulation so that the oil cleaned the engine such as the Valvoline R&P or the new Mobil product ( assuming it works similar of course ), and the oil was changed on an interval based on good UOA data, there shouldn't be any gremlins running around like miniture rats on top of your heads to be washed down into the oil pan below 😁 
    • Worst factory HD wheels GM makes
    • A while back on another thread there were comments and thoughts on air filters and I know that can tend to be a bit of a hot topic because of outfits that have a vested interest in selling aftermarket air boxes fitted with the gauze type of oiled elements touting the lower air restriction. However and unfortunately I don't know where I have seen the test results in the past about the amount of dirt through a test procedure that these style of filters do pass more dirt through than a properly designed ( not some cheap Chinese knock off ) paper/synesthetic media filter can do. Lake Speed had a conversation on that topic with one of the employees at Donaldson and there seemed to be a consensus of these oiled filters falling short in the absolute percentage of dirt holdback.    Which all ties back into how good the air filter is on the engine at keeping dirt out as that is going to reflect as a contaminant introduced into the oil as well as cylinder wear even if some of that dirt does find its way out of the exhaust rather then the crank case. Put another way that one can throw the kitchen sink at filtering the oil and using a bypass system which I fully expect will do nothing but good for the oils contamination but if the air filter system isn't doing its job then its preventing the engine from reaching the best wear/lasting case scenario instead.    Now perhaps this topic is or isn't for this particular thread but Grumpy Bear or anyone else for that matter, do you have access to some scientific trust worthy testing on engine air filter types to get some proper comparison data to post up.
    • WOW, something we agreed on. I only bought at sticker twice. A 94 impala ss and an Acura intagra type r. Made money on the first. Still have the second.
    • I prefer new, but not without a deal. Historically I've bought severely aged new inventory, leftover model year, unpopular configuration kind of stuff that sits around on dealer lots until they just want it gone. $10k off MSRP kind of stuff on a mid-priced truck. That really, really helps knock down that first year depreciation. It also requires being somewhat flexible on colors and options. I wouldn't buy a 4 cylinder if I was looking for an 8 cylinder, but if I got blue paint instead of black, or a great deal was lacking a minor option, I'm willing to overlook those things for savings.   Used <> used. Condition and history are everything. If I'm buying used I'm looking for cream of the crop. The truck from the guy who religiously pampers it, and then decides a year later he wants newer and nicer. NOT the ex-rental vehicle, or the crew cab traded in by the family with 7 kids who like to throw food, and the oil only got changed when there was time long after the oil life monitor started alerting.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...