Jump to content

Favre A Viking


gave20

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Yeah, as much as he's gone back & forth, I'm not convinced he won't change is mind.... again.... and again.. and again..... :cheers:

Posted
Just because he says no now doesn't mean if the vikings get a better offense he won't suddenly change his mind.

 

...or when they get past training camp that maybe he doesn't want to go through... :cheers:

Posted
Just because he says no now doesn't mean if the vikings get a better offense he won't suddenly change his mind.

 

...or when they get past training camp that maybe he doesn't want to go through... :cheers:

 

 

Probably more truth to that than most realize.

 

Once he sees T-jack and Sage failing miserably (which they WILL), maybe he will want to come in and try to save the team?

Posted
Probably more truth to that than most realize.

 

Once he sees T-jack and Sage failing miserably (which they WILL), maybe he will want to come in and try to save the team?

 

I read a couple of things yesterday saying that maybe both sides have agreed to "play along with him staying retired" to keep down the media circus for training camp, to keep everyone focused, and then he'll show up, ready to play.. :cheers:

 

I guess we'll see what happens after training camp! :lol:

Posted
Probably more truth to that than most realize.

 

Once he sees T-jack and Sage failing miserably (which they WILL), maybe he will want to come in and try to save the team?

 

I read a couple of things yesterday saying that maybe both sides have agreed to "play along with him staying retired" to keep down the media circus for training camp, to keep everyone focused, and then he'll show up, ready to play.. :cheers:

 

I guess we'll see what happens after training camp! :lol:

 

 

And the saga continues.....

 

:D

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Favre has made one of the biggest mistakes in sports history with his wavering decision-making. He lost a great deal of fan support the minute he started looking for other teams when he left Green Bay. Not retiring as a Packer should be something he regrets for the rest of his life...don't think he knows that for some reason...

Posted

For some reason, i dont think he cares.... he's probably drinking beer and hunting without a worry in the world. That extra year with the Jets helped him solidify his retirement, now he will never have the "what if" question. He went back and got his answer.

Posted
Favre has made one of the biggest mistakes in sports history with his wavering decision-making. He lost a great deal of fan support the minute he started looking for other teams when he left Green Bay. Not retiring as a Packer should be something he regrets for the rest of his life...don't think he gives a shit though...

 

Fixed. :nono:

Posted
Favre has made one of the biggest mistakes in sports history with his wavering decision-making. He lost a great deal of fan support the minute he started looking for other teams when he left Green Bay. Not retiring as a Packer should be something he regrets for the rest of his life...don't think he gives a shit though...

 

Fixed. :nono:

 

 

+1

Posted

Hahaha - I suppose you guys are all right. If it were me, I would have skipped the year at the Jets and started my full-time hunting, beer-drinking, and big-dollar endorsements career early ;-)

Posted
Farve is better then what the Vikings have now........

 

Who is that? :lol:

 

Oh, and my mom is better than anyone the Vikings have now. :P

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...