Kept thinking about this thread last nite. I feel that my comment was a bit cavalier and didn’t provide enough information into my thoughts on the matter of oil filtration.
First, it makes sense that not all filters are the same and that a filter that is capable of filtering smaller particles will reduce the size of those particles in suspension and reduce engine wear.
Then I remembered that since the company I work for builds the most beautiful aircraft in the world…I have access to SAE articles. So, I read it this morning.
It’s an interesting article, from 1988, but the premise remains the same.
The abstract is descriptive, but doesn’t tell the whole story.
First off, wear is reduced by reducing size of particles. But is too much of a good thing bad? Possibly in the case of oil filtration. The filter may plug sooner with a finer media, thereby causing more damage. There are other considerations in the paper to be reasoned with.
Also note that “Fine Test Dust” was added to the crankcases of the engines to accelerate the engine wear.
More importantly, just because this article reduced engine wear by 70% (in some cases) in a test environment results in real world applications will vary from engine to engine.
This test was done to correlate oil filtration with engine wear. It was not designed to predict how much longer your engine will last. It can be inferred that your engine will last longer with better filtration.
I still agree with UGADawgs. Like I said yesterday. With this one caveat:
Pick a quality filter. Do research (if you want to).
I have way too many other priorities in my life to get down in the details on engine oil filters.
OP, if you are concerned about aftermarket filters, roll with the OEM filter. You can’t go wrong.
You can go better (possibly)…but OEM will serve you well.
Keep your oil clean, use a quality oil and filter. Enjoy your truck.
If anyone is interested in the SAE paper, send me your email. I’ll fwd it to you.