Jump to content

Why Would I Want A 2500ld Vs 1500


Recommended Posts

Posted

As you guys probably know I have been market for a truck since I got back from Iraq this January. I happen to come across a 2004 2500 with 82000 miles on it. It is owned by an elderly couple. Great people. Has the 6.0 and 4 speed tranny. Link with more info below.

 

My question why would I want to buy a 2500LD over a regular 1500. I mean the only reason I can think of is because I want the selectable 4x4 and 6.0.

 

Please chime in and let me know your thoughts. Thanks

 

2004 2500

Posted
As you guys probably know I have been market for a truck since I got back from Iraq this January. I happen to come across a 2004 2500 with 82000 miles on it. It is owned by an elderly couple. Great people. Has the 6.0 and 4 speed tranny. Link with more info below.

 

My question why would I want to buy a 2500LD over a regular 1500. I mean the only reason I can think of is because I want the selectable 4x4 and 6.0.

 

Please chime in and let me know your thoughts. Thanks

 

2004 2500

 

 

if all u want is a truck and u dont plan on towing a lot with it dont waste the extra money on a 2500.. it will be a waste in fuel money too. that 6.0 dont get nearly as good fuel mileage as they 5.3 or even the 4.8. if u dont care about that then get the 6.0 cuz more power is always better.. and as for the selectable 4wd.. what do u mean selectable? u mean like electronic [push button]? cuz thats pretty much standard on the newer trucks.

Posted
As you guys probably know I have been market for a truck since I got back from Iraq this January. I happen to come across a 2004 2500 with 82000 miles on it. It is owned by an elderly couple. Great people. Has the 6.0 and 4 speed tranny. Link with more info below.

 

My question why would I want to buy a 2500LD over a regular 1500. I mean the only reason I can think of is because I want the selectable 4x4 and 6.0.

 

Please chime in and let me know your thoughts. Thanks

 

2004 2500

 

That is a 2500HD with the LT trim package.

 

As well as getting the bigger motor, the 2500 gets bigger brakes, bigger axles, stronger suspension, tranny cooler, etc.

 

The 2500 is a more capable truck and as such it will also retain more of it's value - there will always be a small business (or snow plow company, etc) looking for it.

Posted
As you guys probably know I have been market for a truck since I got back from Iraq this January. I happen to come across a 2004 2500 with 82000 miles on it. It is owned by an elderly couple. Great people. Has the 6.0 and 4 speed tranny. Link with more info below.

 

My question why would I want to buy a 2500LD over a regular 1500. I mean the only reason I can think of is because I want the selectable 4x4 and 6.0.

 

Please chime in and let me know your thoughts. Thanks

 

2004 2500

 

That is a 2500HD with the LT trim package.

 

As well as getting the bigger motor, the 2500 gets bigger brakes, bigger axles, stronger suspension, tranny cooler, etc.

 

The 2500 is a more capable truck and as such it will also retain more of it's value - there will always be a small business (or snow plow company, etc) looking for it.

 

 

I forgot to mention in the original post that they only want 14K for it not including TTL. According to KBB it is worth 15200 is good condition. The guy told me over the phone that is was a regular 2500. If it was an HD, it would have the allison transmission correct? Also be selectable, yes I mean push button. I am buying a truck so gas mileage really isn't an issue. I was looking at a denali earlier because I want the 6.0.

Posted
As you guys probably know I have been market for a truck since I got back from Iraq this January. I happen to come across a 2004 2500 with 82000 miles on it. It is owned by an elderly couple. Great people. Has the 6.0 and 4 speed tranny. Link with more info below.

 

My question why would I want to buy a 2500LD over a regular 1500. I mean the only reason I can think of is because I want the selectable 4x4 and 6.0.

 

Please chime in and let me know your thoughts. Thanks

 

2004 2500

 

Search for a VMax if you want the 6.0 without as much of a fuel penalty. Here are a couple examples from around the country. You could also look up the 1500HD. Some of those came with 6.0 ( I think some came with the 5.3 also :crazy: ) and more load carrying capacity.

 

VMax #1

VMax #2

Posted

 

.... If it was an HD, it would have the allison transmission correct? Also be selectable, yes I mean push button. I am buying a truck so gas mileage really isn't an issue. I was looking at a denali earlier because I want the 6.0...

 

No, the 6.0 did not have the alli transmission..that was/is only available with the 8.1 gas or the 6.6 Duramax Diesel engine. A 2005 would have been a 5 speed alli, but this truck is a 4 speed....not near as capable as the alli. The rear end should have 4:10 gears..and for occasional towing, shorter trips and reasonable sized ttl or 5th wheels, is good enough..but nothing over 8000lbs or milage goes south VERY quickly, and going up hills becomes, well, problematic.

 

This truck would be a good hauler (for stuff in the back) good snow plow truck, etc. The 2500 Crew also has the 6'6" box over the Denali's (1500 crew) 5'5" long box (useless in my mind). Like others said..its more of a 'working' truck, not a run-around like the 1500's would be.

Posted

So if I want the 6.0 I could always go with a 1500HD. Whats the difference between that and a 2500 non HD? From read really absolutely nothing except that it is bigger. Drive train and options are the same. Anyone think this a good deal.

Posted
So if I want the 6.0 I could always go with a 1500HD. Whats the difference between that and a 2500 non HD? From read really absolutely nothing except that it is bigger. Drive train and options are the same. Anyone think this a good deal.

 

 

From what I can remember,the 1500HD is really a 2500 frame with different springs and suspension...(read softer, less load carrying) but mostly everything else is 2500HD... It has the 6'6" bed..crew cab, and you could get the V-max 6.0 (345 HP). Look on GM's website for specs..they might still be present.

 

Probably a good compromise between the 2500 and the 1500....it will still not fit in a 20" garage! but I seriously considered the 1500HD for myself, until I found my duramax....dream find....

 

btw..they stopped making the 1500HD in the nbs, only obs. (not past 2007.5).

Posted
As you guys probably know I have been market for a truck since I got back from Iraq this January. I happen to come across a 2004 2500 with 82000 miles on it. It is owned by an elderly couple. Great people. Has the 6.0 and 4 speed tranny. Link with more info below.

 

My question why would I want to buy a 2500LD over a regular 1500. I mean the only reason I can think of is because I want the selectable 4x4 and 6.0.

 

Please chime in and let me know your thoughts. Thanks

 

2004 2500

 

That is a 2500HD with the LT trim package.

 

As well as getting the bigger motor, the 2500 gets bigger brakes, bigger axles, stronger suspension, tranny cooler, etc.

 

The 2500 is a more capable truck and as such it will also retain more of it's value - there will always be a small business (or snow plow company, etc) looking for it.

 

 

 

I agree with shocktrp.

 

This is a good looking truck. If mpg is a non-issue, I would go with a 2500 over a 1500 (which is what I did). The 2500 will typically be econonical to operate after the 1500 is no longer economical to operate (worn out).

 

I would ask to see the service records on the truck. I would think that a couple that kept the truck in this good of a condition would have detailed service records on the truck.

Posted

So the 2500 is more of a working truck. I honestly don't know if I should go with it then because I do more driving than hauling. How would the gas mileage compare to a denali with the 6.0. It would probably be worse since it has bigger gears in the back correct.

 

I am honestly torn as to what I want. I like the denali truck but can't find one that fits my budget. I also like the 2500 because it sits higher and I can get the 6.0L with the push button 4x4 (denali I can't).

 

If I don't tow or haul much of anything, then I should go with a 1500 unless I want push button 4x4 and the 6.0. (thinking out loud) :crazy:

Posted

you are right.... in 2004 there was both 2500 and 2500HD.....

 

.. it was a nameplate/badge issue... in 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, and 2007 (Old body Style) this very same equipped truck was called 1500HD.... the truck has GVW 8600lbs

 

.. in my opinion this is a great TRUCK .. it has a 6.5 ft box with the crew cab (CCin the 1500 only has the little shrimpy box less than 6 feet)

 

.. it has a 6L engine (not the 6L that is in the 2500HD), and has a strong transmission, 8-bolt wheel/axles

 

.. good choice if you ever intend to haul a travel trailer or 5th wheel trailer once in a while

 

.. if I were looking this week for a newer truck, I'd buy it!!! ... I think it's a good price..... and it looks like it has been well looked after.

Posted

thank you for all the comments. I don't attend to haul anything now but you never know what I will get in the future. :thumbs: I am going to test drive it tomorrow after work. I will let you guys know. What size gears did the 2500 non HD come with?

Posted
So the 2500 is more of a working truck. I honestly don't know if I should go with it then because I do more driving than hauling. How would the gas mileage compare to a denali with the 6.0. It would probably be worse since it has bigger gears in the back correct.

 

I am honestly torn as to what I want. I like the denali truck but can't find one that fits my budget. I also like the 2500 because it sits higher and I can get the 6.0L with the push button 4x4 (denali I can't).

If I don't tow or haul much of anything, then I should go with a 1500 unless I want push button 4x4 and the 6.0. (thinking out loud) :thumbs:

 

The Vmax trucks should have push button 4x4. Correct me if I am wrong fellas.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • You can install tailpipes that direct the exhaust sideways vs the OEM one that goes straight back. There are several on the market, do you own research. HOWEVER, you need to make sure the Venturi vents are still intact, otherwise it will throw a engine code. There is a sensor somewhere that detects back pressure on the exhaust. And if it doesn't collect the correct metrics, it will throw the truck into limp mode. 
    • "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...
    • // Thank you, also for your  response. More information is always good. This 2013 GMC is most likely my 'forever truck"-I'm 77 and retired...and truck only has 42K on it-very clean-so I try to keep it that way.  Tks again for your  response- glenn
    • I started my install this weekend. Everything was pretty straight forward but I ran into one issue with running power through the firewall. The nipple grommet on my High Country already has a small harness running through it - has anyone else ran into this issue? And on the engine bay side, does the wire basically just penetrate the factory wiring boot? I did this on my '22 Trail Boss and it seems much easier but thats been a few years. My other thought would be possibly drilling a new hole adding a rubber grommet just to the lower left of the factory hole. Thoughts?   Has anyone used a T-harness off the Bose amp and obtained power from there? It seems a little odd that such a small amp needs 3 power leads
    • ///// Ok--Thanks for that info--I could not find yesterday when I looked for the specs on that NAPA filter what I wanted. Their website is not very user friendly. I buy all teh filters for  our three vehicles once or twice a year. Have always run NAPA Gold on everything I own....I buy it thru my Son's account for his business-which he has a Heavy Equipment repair shop-one reason he uses NAPA so much-they have such a full line of coverage for just about anything/anywhere- He gets s  good discount because of volume bought. Anyway-Thank you -Sir for your response.   glenn
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...