Jump to content

Another Recall


pm26

Recommended Posts

Posted

that's it? where;s the big IN BOLD headline? that's what "we" do when it's toyota, dodge, ford, etc. lol. great so my rear axle may locak up and send me into a tree? why does that seem like a waaaaaaaaay more important recall than the Ford/Dodge's lol..

Posted

I can honestly say this is one time were us dealers knew about the recalls before the media and the general public!!

 

A lot of the trucks involved haven't even been delivered to dealers yet,we have one truck involved,and were waiting for it to show up from the plant.

 

 

Subject: 10426 - Rear Axle Cross Pin Fracture

 

Models:

2011 Cadillac Escalade EXT

 

2011 Chevrolet Avalanche, Silverado

 

2011 GMC Sierra

 

Condition

General Motors has decided that a defect, which relates to motor vehicle safety, exists in certain 2011 model year Cadillac Escalade EXT; Chevrolet Avalanche, Silverado; and GMC Sierra vehicles. Some of these vehicles have a condition in which the rear axle cross pin was not manufactured to specification. The pin was improperly heat treated and could fracture and become displaced within the rear axle. If this were to occur, the driver may hear a banging noise coming from the axle. If the pin shifts out of position, it could create an interference condition and cause the rear axle to lock. The driver may not be able to maintain directional control of the vehicle and a crash could occur without prior warning.

 

Correction:

Dealers are to install a new rear axle cross pin.

 

Vehicles Involved:

Involved are certain 2011 model year Cadillac EXT; Chevrolet Avalanche, Silverado; and GMC Sierra vehicles.

 

Important: Dealers are to confirm vehicle eligibility prior to beginning repairs by using the Required Field Actions section in the Global Warranty system. Not all vehicles within the above breakpoints may be involved.

 

For dealers with involved vehicles, a listing with involved vehicles containing the complete vehicle identification number, customer name, and address information has been prepared and will be provided to US and Canadian dealers through the GM GlobalConnect Recall Reports, or sent directly to export dealers.

Dealers will not have a report available if they have no involved vehicles currently assigned.

Posted

Looks to me like GM changed the part (pin) supplier to save money and it backfired on them. This is a critical part that must be properly hardened to work correctly.

Posted
Looks to me like GM changed the part (pin) supplier to save money and it backfired on them. This is a critical part that must be properly hardened to work correctly.

 

Sounds to me like the supplier or GM quality control detected the defect and worked backwards to identify the problem. If that's true, it indicates excellent QC. They detected the issue with no failures and (apparently) before some vehicles have even been delivered. Kudos to GM.

Posted
:cool: Wonder if mines involved.

uh it's a 2011 GMC Sierra isn't it? :cheers:

 

Not all 2011's are involved,Only 1300.

 

Steven post me the last 8 of your VIN and I'll check.

Posted

From the recall list of VIN's they are all 1/2-ton crew-cabs built at the Mexico plant.

Posted

And all of the axle assemblies are built by AAM then shipped to the plants. GM does not build thier own axle

assemblies and has not for nearly 15 years.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did the KYBs keep it the same height in the front? I was concerned that pre-assembled assembly would raise it up an inch to standard non-z60 height.. I guess which it would make the rake 1 inch instead of 2 inches.
    • Thank you for keeping the train on the tracks and for a thoughtful engagement. I enjoyed the reflection on a previous stance to refine and improve your position. I like that inquisitive flexibility about you Atlas.    No the process isn't sterile. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of miles of piping, vessels, pumps. Chevron, the people I worked for, were keenly aware that there is a market for what is known as their "ISOCLEAN" line of lubricants. These are lubricants that are the same as those sold bulk that are further processed by filtration to a level your particular application demands. They will filter and package and provide lab documentation as required. Do not kid yourself. Every gallon of oil that goes into a Chevron Turbine, reciprocating compressor, generator is prefiltered and tested before being charged. Lest wise it was when I was there in the plants I worked in.    There are requirements set by manufactures for the cleanliness of the oils used in their equipment. OTR such as CUMMINS has standards shared with customers on this. Commercial interest selling to Ma and Pa do, but don't share that information. Not even upon request but internally, they do exist.    The GM study sited, (Graph from Machinery Lubrication in previous post) only shows "relative" importance.  I find that fascinating. By constructing the graph like this they admit there are dozens of factors in engine life and via scientific method determined the effect of 'relative cleanliness' on engine life not in miles but in 'FACTORS'. This allows a certain amount of reverse engineering does it not?   They even provided some touchstones. Beta 75 as a reference point. Wonderful stuff!!   Smaller blenders CAN and some DO take the time and effort to do better than a refinery or large bulk blender, like Warren Oil, in improving the "in the can" cleanliness. No I don't have a list but testing could generate that information.    Again, but one of several levers we can pull to improve engine life. The simplest is keeping a clean work station while doing your own oil changes.     
    • Thank you. I'll give it a try 
    • I just spent the last 45K miles doing samples every oil change over more than a full year to get the data for seasons and break-in to broke in.    I found the same thing to be true. Something was always teetering on done or had stepped off the cliff long before the OLM was DOA. In fact, I found about a thousand mile difference between summer and winter. That is during the winter half the OLM was STILL too long. Even the severe schedule was to long in the winter.   Now having done the work I can say I was NOT DISAPOINTED. I saw nothing I didn't already know. Nothing my father hadn't already demonstrated in his 2K OCI's pushing dated iron on dated oils and weak filters to mileages well beyond 300K.   Building on his work through use of Lab testing it wasn't hard to find the correlation between 'sight/feel/odor, the things dad relied on, and test results. Use of current viscosity stable chemistries & filters has pushed that marker for my motors out to 3K summer, 4K winter.    So the early lies were 3K on conventional oil and the lie upon the lie was 7K+. turns out to be off by a factor of two.    So... it is true that modern chemistry has doubled the useful oil life. But the base milage that came from was off by double. It's how good lies work. Partly true, sometimes mostly true so that your meter isn't set off. It also means that non-shear-stable shelf oils are only now as good as the old oils were in their best case scenario.    So the question now is how do we improve on that? Thus the question into cleanliness among the other items listed in the post quoted below.    If this bores you, feel free not to participate.       
    • Is it though?  Like LTZ, not a high take rate.  Current Sierra has AT4, Denali and Elevation as its main bread winners.  Each trim accounting for 25-35% of sales for Sierra.  SLT makes up about 10-15% at best.        Like others have predicted here for GMC, it will be:   - Pro (equal to WT Chevy)   - Elevation (replaces SLE and SLT)   - AT4 (and X)   - Denali (and Ultimate).  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...