Jump to content

$11.00 Thermostat = $400.00


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi,

 

I had a thread a few months ago about trying to find a lower temp thermostat for my 2007 1500 V-Max. I got a 160 degree from Mr. Gasket, which worked fine lowering my water temps.

 

Now, a few months down the line, I get "Engine Hot, a/c turned off" in the DIC and water temp guage shows nothing (dead cold). 1st Chev dealer said the temp sender shorted out. Replaced for $143.00. Had GM Extended Warr, but with $200.00 deduct, so it was out of pocket.

 

Problem returns in a week. Another Chev dealer says thermostat was stuck and made engine run "too cold" and it gave the "Hot" message(?). Covered under the 5/100 warranty, but wait - you have an aftermarket thermostat. Sorry, not covered, so it will cost you $243.00 to replace it (or put the old one back in; either way $243.00).

 

Still working with the second dealership, may still get some help (I have the old original thermostat in my old parts shelf. He might be able to turn it in as defective, maybe). Fingers crossed.

 

New oem thermostat in and running as before - 210 indicated all the time and no messages. He gave me a week to try and see if it screws up (he seemed to think the message was a result of a new bad sender) before paying the piper.

 

Things not looking good for my wallet. Cooler temp with the aftermarket thermostat was what I was looking for, especially during the 100+ temps we've had in TX lately. Just mad about the title of this post!

 

Later

walt z.

Posted

Day to day driving in high temps should not cause any issues in your truck if it is running right. Those temps are rare in NH but we had a day or two if it this summer and of course that was the day someone chose to hit someone else on the highway during my commute. A couple hours of stop and go driving in those temps with AC on full bore and the temp gauge never budged. Cooler temp t-stats will gain you nothing but troubles on a modern engine with all the computer controls. I'd leave it stock.

Posted
Hope you learned something from this.

 

 

And that was...???

 

That a lower temp 'stat was not the panacea you envisioned. If your going to run a different temp stat, then you should have your programming changed for it. Also what were you going to do during winter? Continue to run a 26 degree cooler stat?

Posted

Did not read your earlier post, but why would you want to run cooler? These engines, as well as many others, are proven to be more efficient @ 200-210 deg. Good question on the winter time, what were you going to do?

Posted

what is the point of running a lower temp t-stat?

 

unless your motor has an extreme amount of interior work (CAM, Heads, Supercharger, etc), there are no real overall benefits to running a lower t-stat, the minimal power gains do not outweigh the increased pollution and reduced mpg.

Posted

To address concerns in previous messages:

 

-Black Bear Premium fuel tune.

-Fan reprogrammed to come on at 185.

-No increased pollution - convertors still functioning

-Cooler temp running showed 4-5psi increase oil pressure (which is low in my and other 6.0 engines).

-Lower temp = less detonation tendancy = no knock sensor intervention = more timing = more power.

-Live in TX. 170 degree air from heater is ok when cold.

-Running at 185 (where it was running w/low temp thermostat) is warm enough for computer to think it is normal (no cold engine enrichment happening).

-The gist of this thread was to let me vent on how Chev was putting me over a stump for an $11.00 thermostat (and maybe how dumb I was to have it in there when bringing the truck in for service), not why I was wanting to put one in my motor.

 

But, thanks for all of your input.

 

walt z.

Posted
To address concerns in previous messages:

 

-Black Bear Premium fuel tune.

-Fan reprogrammed to come on at 185.

-No increased pollution - convertors still functioning

-Cooler temp running showed 4-5psi increase oil pressure (which is low in my and other 6.0 engines).

-Lower temp = less detonation tendancy = no knock sensor intervention = more timing = more power.

-Live in TX. 170 degree air from heater is ok when cold.

-Running at 185 (where it was running w/low temp thermostat) is warm enough for computer to think it is normal (no cold engine enrichment happening).

-The gist of this thread was to let me vent on how Chev was putting me over a stump for an $11.00 thermostat (and maybe how dumb I was to have it in there when bringing the truck in for service), not why I was wanting to put one in my motor.

 

But, thanks for all of your input.

 

walt z.

 

Ok that's fair thanks for the info from your pov. But can you blame gm? Why would they warranty a non gm part? Though personally I would've just changed it myself for the $11.

Posted
To address concerns in previous messages:

 

-Black Bear Premium fuel tune.

-Fan reprogrammed to come on at 185.

-No increased pollution - convertors still functioning

-Cooler temp running showed 4-5psi increase oil pressure (which is low in my and other 6.0 engines).

-Lower temp = less detonation tendancy = no knock sensor intervention = more timing = more power.

-Live in TX. 170 degree air from heater is ok when cold.

-Running at 185 (where it was running w/low temp thermostat) is warm enough for computer to think it is normal (no cold engine enrichment happening).

-The gist of this thread was to let me vent on how Chev was putting me over a stump for an $11.00 thermostat (and maybe how dumb I was to have it in there when bringing the truck in for service), not why I was wanting to put one in my motor.

 

But, thanks for all of your input.

 

walt z.

 

Ok that's fair thanks for the info from your pov. But can you blame gm? Why would they warranty a non gm part? Though personally I would've just changed it myself for the $11.

 

 

 

Oh, I agree about not warrantying a 'non-GM' part. I took it back the second time because the message and symptoms were the same as the first occurence, which the first Chev dealer diagnosed as a bad temp sender. I figured that the temp sender that was put in was a bad one also, so I was blind-sided when the second dealer pulled the thermostat. BTW, I went to the second different dealer because they were closer to my house - I was in a different part of the county when the first problem showed up.

 

If I thought it was the thermostat, I would have been all over it - especially at $243.00 a pop!!!! Maybe the service manager will work with me (as he hinted about doing).

 

Once it is all done, I'll may put the low temp one back in just to see what happens. They (SLP, Mr Gasket, etc) sell too many of these thermostats for this to an on-going problem (that all vehicle PCM's crap themselves when the temp gets lower than normal). I'm thinking that my thermostat is indeed bad.

 

But we'll see.

 

Later

walt z.

Posted
To address concerns in previous messages:

 

-Black Bear Premium fuel tune.

-Fan reprogrammed to come on at 185.

-No increased pollution - convertors still functioning

-Cooler temp running showed 4-5psi increase oil pressure (which is low in my and other 6.0 engines).

-Lower temp = less detonation tendancy = no knock sensor intervention = more timing = more power.

-Live in TX. 170 degree air from heater is ok when cold.

-Running at 185 (where it was running w/low temp thermostat) is warm enough for computer to think it is normal (no cold engine enrichment happening).

-The gist of this thread was to let me vent on how Chev was putting me over a stump for an $11.00 thermostat (and maybe how dumb I was to have it in there when bringing the truck in for service), not why I was wanting to put one in my motor.

 

But, thanks for all of your input.

 

walt z.

 

Ok that's fair thanks for the info from your pov. But can you blame gm? Why would they warranty a non gm part? Though personally I would've just changed it myself for the $11.

 

 

 

Oh, I agree about not warrantying a 'non-GM' part. I took it back the second time because the message and symptoms were the same as the first occurence, which the first Chev dealer diagnosed as a bad temp sender. I figured that the temp sender that was put in was a bad one also, so I was blind-sided when the second dealer pulled the thermostat. BTW, I went to the second different dealer because they were closer to my house - I was in a different part of the county when the first problem showed up.

 

If I thought it was the thermostat, I would have been all over it - especially at $243.00 a pop!!!! Maybe the service manager will work with me (as he hinted about doing).

 

Once it is all done, I'll may put the low temp one back in just to see what happens. They (SLP, Mr Gasket, etc) sell too many of these thermostats for this to an on-going problem (that all vehicle PCM's crap themselves when the temp gets lower than normal). I'm thinking that my thermostat is indeed bad.

 

But we'll see.

 

Later

walt z.

 

 

 

All engine get condensation or moisture from heating and cooling. What temperature do you think the engine has to get to turn that moisture into a vapor so it can be purged through the PVC system? A bi-product of moisture is sludge. Also Gm spend millions of dollars developing and testing these engines. Why didn't they put a cooler thermostat in. One of the reason is expansion and contraction. The wider the heat range (from when the thermostat open 160° and when the fan comes on 228°) is more than GM like for their engine. especially aluminum component engines. It causes too much movement on the gasket surfaces. The results is gasket failure. These are a few of the reasons why they use a hotter thermostat. I don't think "SLP, Mr Gasket, etc" care how your engine runs. That is your problem. They care about selling their products. I am sure there is application where it is beneficial like a marine engine for instances. Ask them how many millions of dollars they spent developing, testing and documenting the results of their testing.

 

That being said, these are just my comments and by no means trying to persuade you one way or the other. It is just some information that you can use any way you want to.

 

Good Luck

Posted

I read the whole thread and the point I see you making is that you modified your truck and then took it to the dealer for repair and got charged. Yep, I would be mad at myself if I did that also. Not sure what I would be more mad about, going to a lower temp thermostat or going to the dealer. As for the beating, you certainly should have expected that.

 

:lol::)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure if this should be a new topic, let me know if it's out of place. This my first post. Thanks 85077522 - AC Delco GM Genuine Parts Brake Master Cylinders. Anyone else had to replace this brake master cylinder yet. I didn't do any brake work, it looks like new parts and I've had the truck for about 4k miles, 119k total miles.  When it started to throw codes I did the calibrations with a bidirectional scanner and got the codes to clear but they came back so I did the routine; base bleed, automated bleed and final base bleed. All that with Bosch ES16-32N fluid (please look it up). That seemed to fix it but 100ish miles later it failed again so I ran the same process but with a pressure bleeder this time and got the same results, fixed for 100ish miles. The original fluid looked bad and I thought I got most of it out, it could've been the wrong fluid. The codes; P25A2, C05B0-00, C2A1B. I can get them to clear but not for long. The C05B0 indicates a leak in the front circuit (which is bone dry) so I'm thinking of doing the bleed process on that front again today and I don't know if that's taboo to just do the front but at this point it seems like it's worth the try anyway. The new master cylinder/module unit is supposed to get here today. But now I'm pretty much convinced this install is over my head. I've called several shops and some mobile guys that I know but this thing is like radio active material, scary wise. I did get 2 local shops say they should be able to do it, one says he has the SPS2 programing capability. And with the battery disconnected is there supposed to be pedal resistance, mine is to the floor, then if I pump it I can get some resistance. I had a panic stop prior to this issue which may have contributed from what I read. And on the first attempt to bleed and hydraulic test the scanner listed things to look for and one was any gaps between the pad and rotors which I did notice on the RF corner and I removed the outer pad (where the gap was) cleaned it and the hardware and didn't see a gap after that but will re-check it. I read that if pushing the caliper pistons back then you're supposed to open the bleeder so as to not push fluid backwards into the abs module or it will damage it. If that's true then that's also a possibility from the previous owner having the brakes changed before I got it. I'm using an XTool ip500 scanner. Any suggestions, questions and comments welcome. 
    • Next Friday will be my 6 week point from my right knee replacement.  The surgeon says it will be fine if I choose to drive after this checkup.  I know I could drive now but best to do as my surgeon (and my wife) tell me.  Richard compared being 62 to 72.  I remember when I was in my early 60's I was experiencing slow but regular decline in my mobility.  Thanks to good medical support,  i continued to fight the speed and spread of this decline. During my 60's I worked on non-surgical methods and just when I turned 70, my orthopedic surgeon recommended joint replacements.  In a little over a year, I had one shoulder and both knees replaced.  This hasn't been a terribly fun experience, but worth the discomfort as my future mobility health trajectory has reversed.  It is a treat to now be watching my mobility. balance and confidence steadily improve!
    • Grommets with the right cement should be perfectly fine. 
    • This is going to take allot of Assembly    
    • Why do they have the gas 10l80 opening at 145?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...