Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey buddy. No boost gauge, Callaway tells me about 7 pounds as well. As far as a tune, I'm told Justin at Black Bear Performance is the man for GM tunes. I'm told that these LS motors, in our case the L9H, have pretty good knock sensors and they will retard your timing if they sense detonation. That might ease your mind a bit. If you end up doing a boost gauge let me know how that works out, I may follow suit. You sound just like me, I get 540HP under my right foot and within a week I'm thinking "a little more"...

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
114.jpg Edited by PDYoung
Posted (edited)

 

th_118.jpgFinally i was able to post some pictures This is a video,click on picture to get video to play.

Edited by PDYoung
Posted

Trying to post photos is a train wreck :lol:

Posted

I use photobucket for photos. So much easier. Upload it and it even generates the correct code to post it on a forum like this.

Posted

Nice work PDYoung. You buy a truck, rip off the front end, re-wire it, and tear apart the motor, all in the pursuit of more power. You've got a giant set my friend. Keep the updates coming, If I ever get a day off I'll try to get some stuff together on mine as well.

Posted

Just got back from a road trip while towing with my 2011 L9H 4WD non NHT. Had 4 people in the truck, pulling an alum. open car trailer and a 3500 lb. car. Love the 6 speed auto but would like 3.73's over the current 3.42's. Cruising at 75mph in 100 degree heat, the trans. stayed in 5th most of the time with downshifts into 4th on hills. MPG was 10-12 running between 89-91 octane, all had 10% ethonal. My only concern was the trans. temp. On the highway it would run 175-190 depending on hills, but in stop and go traffic it would go right up to 196 with a peak of 205. My 07 Vmax never got that hot even when pulling an enclosed trailer.

 

Did NHT trucks get a bigger trans. cooler?

Posted

That's not hot and appears to be changing (from highway to city) just like it should.

 

I'll assume your vmax had a 4L70 and 4.10 gears as well? That makes a huge difference.

 

As long as that trans fluid isn't 240+, I wouldn't sweat a thing.

 

P.S., I'd stop running lower than 91 octane as well cause you're just causing more issues with power and mileage because of it.

Posted

Thanks for the reply. I did some research today and see that my temp. wasn't as big a cause for concern as I first thought. This truck is still being broken in, turned over 4000 miles on the trip.

 

My previous Vmax had the 4L70 with 3.73's.

 

I was on the fence between 2500HD 6.0 w/3.73's or a 1500 w/6.2. Bought a leftover '11 and thought it was strange this truck had 3.42's as apparently all the others I had found were NHT's with 3.73's. Lesson learned.

Posted

Brian- Have you put on an aftermarket grille? My buddy put a billet style with the narrow bars/narrow openings between bars on his truck and his tranny temps went up as well. Did you use tow haul mode? That will usually keep it from downshifting quite as often. I'll bet that without that trailer behind you you're getting much better hwy mpg with the 3.42's. I guess there are pros and cons to both sets of gears.

Posted

No aftermarket grille. The truck is 100% stock down to the paper air filter, exhaust and factory chrome 20 inch wheels. Honestly fuel economy is unloaded is nearly identical to my 07 with the 4L70 and 3.73 gears.

 

Tow/Haul was used 95% of the time. On previous trucks I haven't liked t/h in city driving, felt like a large stall convertor and wouldn't upshift (especially in an 01 2500HD we had). Experimented a bit and didn't see any change as far as temps go with t/h on or off.

 

I realize LS engines make there power up in the rpm's but never have embraced the idea that 10 hours of 3000-4000 rpm pulling a load is ok. That's where I'll be running with the enclosed trailer hooked up. Trailer weighs 4400 empty and we put 4000 worth of stuff (car, canopy, cooler, etc.) in it. We only make 1 trip a year like that so a gas guzzling HD for the rest of the year didn't make much sense.

 

Now looking at the basics of modding, the replacement Magnaflow muffler, CAI kit and possibly a tune.

Posted

CAI is not worth it, just do an MIT tube and a BB tune. Should make a world of difference.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...