Jump to content

2" RC is in, now rear blocks?


Recommended Posts

Posted

So I got the 2" RC installed. I'm thinking about lifting the rear an extra inch just for a little rake and so it sits level if I load some wood or tow. Anyone know what I need to do and order? I know there is stock blocks there but I'm assuming those come out and bigger ones go in.

Posted

I installed Rough Country 3" rear blocks when I did my leveling kit. It has the factory rake back in it, just sits higher now. My truck sits level with the dump trailor connected loaded with 1/2 ton of coal.

 

I ordered my rear blocks from Rocky Mountain Suspension Products..........Rough Country Part # 6564 .........$45.95

Remove the OEM blocks and U-bolts, install new ones.

Posted

I went 3" on mine

 

Stock are 1.25"

 

Not bad to install

 

 

Ryan

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Yep, take factory blocks and hardware out. Install new blocks and hardware. It's easier than doing the front level kit if you ask me. I did the 3" rear block too. It gives 1.75" of lift (factory block is 1.25") so it sits with just a hair less rake than stock. I tow some toys and don't like complete level unloaded or nose high when towing.

Posted

I run 275/55/20 which is the oem size for the optional 20" wheels. Thought real hard about going 275/60/20 but didn't. Here's a pic with my other set of 20"s with new tires.

 

Well for some reason the pic didn't post...

Posted

SoCo, I have 275/60/20 tires with the RC 2" level and the RC 1.25" body lift. It sits pretty level butsometime when I look at it, It just looks likes I could go higher in the back. Don't really want to go 3" block, Is there anywhere to get 1.75"/2"...?

Posted

U can get 1" lift or 1.75" of lift with rear blocks thru readout. How much lift do u want?

 

 

Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk

 

Ready lift 3" rear blocks give u 1.75" of lift as the stock blocks u remove are 1.25".

 

 

Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk

Posted

Leave the stock block alone. I got 3" rear blocks when I put my 2.5" CCM on, but I hate the rake now. Wish I had left it stock...don't know what I was thinking when I put those on haha.

 

Leave it level. It looks 100x better

 

 

Well when I'm towing an atv and have another one in the bed, I don't want to look like a ranger dragging its rear end on the asphalt. I don't mind a rake, I really only put the RC on for a bit of lift in the front end since they sit so low.

Posted

Leave the stock block alone. I got 3" rear blocks when I put my 2.5" CCM on, but I hate the rake now. Wish I had left it stock...don't know what I was thinking when I put those on haha.

 

Leave it level. It looks 100x better

 

 

Well when I'm towing an atv and have another one in the bed, I don't want to look like a ranger dragging its rear end on the asphalt. I don't mind a rake, I really only put the RC on for a bit of lift in the front end since they sit so low.

 

 

I agree with you Patrick.

 

Frogfish, it takes less than an hour so why not swap the stock blocks back in if you really don't like the rake now. From looking at your pic you have no rake. Actually looks a tad nose high but I know pics can be misleading.

Posted

I agree that these trucks look much better leveled out. However, I hate the nose high look when towing or hauling something. If you're still wanting rake, but not as much as factory....then replace the stock block with a 2" or 2.5"...for .75" or 1.25" of lift in the rear.

Posted

Why not run helpers instead of riding around in a truck with rake all the time? Truck sits level at all times, even when loaded and probably ends up riding better while towing also.

Posted

Why not run helpers instead of riding around in a truck with rake all the time? Truck sits level at all times, even when loaded and probably ends up riding better while towing also.

 

 

I don't mind a rake, cheaper to ad blocks than helpers

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 568 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...