Jump to content

07 and up GMT-900 Door Speaker Install


Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm sure there is a similar write up somewhere, but I figured I'd share my method.

 

My factory front door speaks were toast so I picked up some Pioneer TS-A1674R 6.5" 3-way speakers and installed them in about 30 minutes. I was actually quite surprised at how good they sound so I picked up another set for the rears. Anyway, on to the install.

 

Removing the door panel is so simple it really doesn't require any instructions...

 

Use a small flat head and pop off these plastic inserts and remove 3 10mm bolts, then pop off the door panel. There's no need to take it all the way off. The speaker is attached using a 7mm bolt. Remove that and then use a small flat head to pop the speaker mount loose. (I only took pics of the rear install. Front door you pop off the grab handel cover and remove a couple of 10mm bolts there too).

 

2012-07-23193827.jpg

 

Pioneer speaker next to OEM trash.

2012-07-23194926.jpg

 

Places like Crutchfield sell adaptors and wiring harnesses bundled in with the price of their speakers, but they are not needed. So save your coins and buy the speakers else where. First, take your factory speaker/mount (as they are all one piece) and flip it over. Next take a wood chisel or something similar and a hammer and carefully break the plastic "fingers" that attach the speaker to the rest of the OEM mount.

 

2012-07-23191914.jpg

 

Once you've broken all of these (while being careful not to damage the lip they attach to) just push the speaker out of the front. Pull all of the old foam off too.

 

2012-07-23192120.jpg

 

With the Pioneers, the speaker didn't quite fit down into the recess, so I placed it on top and drilled small pilot holes in the speaker mount. Then I used the screws provided with the speaker to screw the speaker to the mount. I only used 3 screws in each.

 

2012-07-23192900.jpg

 

The speakers are well secured with the screws but I hammered the small metal tabs on the speakers down and over the lip of the OEM mount for a cleaner look and more stability.

 

2012-07-23192934.jpg

 

Nothing special guys, but I figured I'd share with those of you thinking of taking this on. It was getting dark, so no pics of them in the doors, but they mount and appear as factory of course. As far as wiring goes, I cut and spliced. If you're curious about wiring, just use the old GM standard to identify your positive/negative wiring to your door speakers.

 

LF+ tan

LF- gray

RF+ light green

RF- dark green

 

LR+ brown

LR- yellow

RR+ dark blue

RR- light blue

 

If it hadn't of been for me taking pics with my cell phone of this, it would have taken 20 minutes at the most.

Posted

Do you have the Bose or non-Bose radio?

 

I was looking at speakers for my truck (Bose radio) and from what information I could find said that normal 3-way door speakers won't sound very good. I think it had something to do with the pillar mounted speaker and the new speakers have built in tweeters. Basically the whole Bose setup wasn't easy to find replacement speakers that sound good. This just came from some searching on the internet so I take it with a grain of salt.

 

I think the biggest question that I found had to do with the ohm's of the factory speaker compared to aftermarket ones.

 

What are the specs on the speakers?

Posted

I'm non Bose. Speakers are 4 ohm which is fine for any non Bose set up. Bose systems benefit from 2 ohm speakers I believe. I too have tweeters in the pillars, but I find the overall sound quality is way better than factory. IMO my "system" produces a cleaner and clearer sound than the Bose setup in my wife's Tahoe. 3 way speakers have an added mid range driver as opposed to 2 ways and that's the only difference. 2 ways have tweeters as well.

Posted

Did exactly the same thing on my truck. You can also do that to the rear speakers on the ext cab.

Posted

That's what I have found out also. Some said the 4 ohm speakers work fine in a Bose truck and some say they don't. I have the Bose system in my truck though.

 

Does anybody make an aftermarket 2 ohm speaker?

 

Edit: After researching for a few minutes, i'm still confused. Crutchfield says that the GM trucks use a 4 ohm speaker but everywhere else is saying 2 ohm. I might just take the door panel off and see if it's on the back of the speaker.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I am non bose in my SLE ext. cab & my fronts are 8 ohms & my rear are 4 ohms. 3 of my 4 speakers (factory) don't work !!!

After looking at this thread, I now can stop looking for stock speakers because of the housing !!!

 

Thx a ton for posting Blackout !!!!!

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Big help, Thanks! Just fried the back speakers myself. I have them on the workbench and thought I was going to have to drill new holes and mount them directly to the door! I appreciate the extra time you took to take pics!

Posted

h130TSA1674-F.jpeg

Pioneer TS-A1674R 6.5" 3-way speakers has been ordered

Posted

Infinty 6032cf 6.5 2-ways are waiting at the house to be installed!

Posted

Pioneer TS-A1674R 6.5" 3-way speakers has been ordered

 

 

You will be blown away by how much better these sound over stock. For inexpensive speakers that aren't amped they sound really good.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...