Jump to content

$3000 Car Coming to US


RyanbabZ71

Recommended Posts

Posted

As far as the "25% chicken tax" keeping india/china small trucks out of the US

remember that that "good for America company toyoyo" (and other japan companies)

skirted the chicken tax by shipping their trucks here without the beds, mirrors etc.

unattached then attaching them in port after arrival thus avoiding the tax.

(does that chicken tax apply to japan trucks only????)

 

Anyhoo that "good for America" company toyoyo now has a shiny new plant in bc mexico

to make them tacos...........................

Posted

As far as the "25% chicken tax" keeping india/china small trucks out of the US

remember that that "good for America company toyoyo" (and other japan companies)

skirted the chicken tax by shipping their trucks here without the beds, mirrors etc.

unattached then attaching them in port after arrival thus avoiding the tax.

(does that chicken tax apply to japan trucks only????)

 

Anyhoo that "good for America" company toyoyo now has a shiny new plant in bc mexico

to make them tacos...........................

 

 

Furd does the same thing with the Transit Connect; they install windows and seats in the back at the factory in Turkey, then strip all of that out once they hit the US Docks. (unless its ordered as a passenger wagon, then they leave the seats and windows in, and just send it on its way)

Posted

Circumventing the tariff

 

Initially, Japanese manufacturers found they could export "cab-chassis" configurations (which included the entire light truck, less the cargo box or truck bed) with only a 4% tariff.[4] Subsequently, a truck bed would be attached to the chassis in the United States and the vehicle could be sold as a light truck. Examples included the Chevrolet LUV and Ford Courier.

 

The "cab-chassis" loophole was closed in 1980.[4] From 1978–1987, the Subaru Brat carried two detachable rear-facing seats (with seatbelts and carpeting) in its rear bed, to meet classification as a "passenger vehicle" and not a light truck.

 

In 1989, the U.S. Customs changed vehicle classifications, automatically relegating two-door SUVs to light truck status.[4] Eventually, in response to the tariff, Toyota Motor Corp., Nissan Motor Co., Suzuki (through a joint venture with GM), and Honda Motor Co. built assembly plants in the U.S. and Canada.[1]

 

LINK

Posted

As far as the "25% chicken tax" keeping india/china small trucks out of the US

remember that that "good for America company toyoyo" (and other japan companies)

skirted the chicken tax by shipping their trucks here without the beds, mirrors etc.

unattached then attaching them in port after arrival thus avoiding the tax.

(does that chicken tax apply to japan trucks only????)

 

Anyhoo that "good for America" company toyoyo now has a shiny new plant in bc mexico

to make them tacos...........................

 

 

Furd does the same thing with the Transit Connect; they install windows and seats in the back at the factory in Turkey, then strip all of that out once they hit the US Docks. (unless its ordered as a passenger wagon, then they leave the seats and windows in, and just send it on its way)

 

 

 

You look like an immature 12 year old when you spell Ford wrong intentionally.

Posted

As far as the "25% chicken tax" keeping india/china small trucks out of the US

remember that that "good for America company toyoyo" (and other japan companies)

skirted the chicken tax by shipping their trucks here without the beds, mirrors etc.

unattached then attaching them in port after arrival thus avoiding the tax.

(does that chicken tax apply to japan trucks only????)

 

Anyhoo that "good for America" company toyoyo now has a shiny new plant in bc mexico

to make them tacos...........................

 

 

Furd does the same thing with the Transit Connect; they install windows and seats in the back at the factory in Turkey, then strip all of that out once they hit the US Docks. (unless its ordered as a passenger wagon, then they leave the seats and windows in, and just send it on its way)

 

 

 

You look like an immature 12 year old when you spell Ford wrong intentionally.

 

 

I meant to hit 'O', and must have hit 'U' Accidentally; that's what I get for using a Blackberry Playbook to post here.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I also have made keyboard mistakes which are and do look like spelling issues.

Try to proof read everything. But mistakes do pass by.

 

None of these cheap cars will come to US/Canada anytime soon.

Too much safety stuff that is not used in other parts of world.

Why is it taking so long for the Colorado Canyon replacement.

Yes, they are building a new factory but what was wrong with the old factory?

The Thailand truck has to be completely reconfigured to meet NA safety emissions standards.

Much of the world still uses leaded gasoline.

 

The way it was explained to me is that the foreign car manufactures have to make two of the same vehicle if they wish to sell in US. One for the rest of the world - that is cheaper and little to no safety features - and one for NA and maybe Europe.

 

Most have viewed the crash tests of the Chinese cars. Not a pretty sight.

 

“There were huge expectations when the Tata Nano was launched. Initially, it was marketed as a family car. That marketing strategy did not seem to have worked, considering there was a lot of dissatisfaction regarding certain features of the car, including the steering, the noise from the engine, etc. But now the company has not only introduced a better looking car (Nano 2012), it is also aggressively marketing the car by trying to woo urbanities, especially the youth,” said Vipul Vinzuda, a faculty at National Institute of Design (NID) who is also an expert on transportation and automobile design."

 

LINK

Posted

They aren't making a new factory but retooling an old one for the Colorado. You can't just take a factory that say makes the Silverado and then simply make Impalas without major changes. And much of the world does NOT use leaded gas- you can't with cats and most countries require new vehicles be sold with them. Nor is it likely the emissions system has to be totally redone- all kinds of automakers sell models world wide and while there are often market-specific modifications, it isn't a ground up remake.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I was the GM of a Lincoln Mercury dealership back in the 80's. The service lot was always full with "broken" ones. Plenty of transmissions, power windows and a/c repairs. The only one I'd consider owning would be the Marauder at this point and it certainly wouldn't be a daily driver.  My 2025 GMC Sierra 1500 Denali Ultimate is my "Lincoln Town Car" in my retirement. I want all the "stuff". Big infotainment screens, one touch power windows, Supercruise (I won't buy another vehicle without it), hands free pretty much everything. I'm going to swap my current truck for a 2027 Yukon Denali Ultimate so I can have the air suspension and surround vision recording along with all the other "stuff". 
    • Yep mine is on backorder also.
    • The Denali Ultimate's grille is tinted, but the "regular' Denali has a bright chrome grille like the current models.
    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...