swapping out auto for manual
-
Similar Content
-
- 3 replies
- 755 views
-
- 5 replies
- 2,957 views
-
- 1 reply
- 762 views
-
- 0 replies
- 849 views
-
- 2 replies
- 612 views
-
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Forum Statistics
250.3k
Total Topics2.7m
Total Posts -
Member Statistics
342,737
Total Members8,960
Most Online
-
Who's Online 5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,474 Guests (See full list)
-
Latest Articles
-
Posts
-
Yes I have is set with the 1mm disk (Minumim Tension), for spring spacing and I raised my truck in the rear 1.5". You can go 2mm and I think 3mm if you need.Minimum. We are on our way to TN from GA.. My wife is driving and stated she cannot believe and stated she can not belive the difference. -
Most 1 ton trucks come with the factory overload spring, which need to be removed for installation of RoadActive Suspension. Removing the overload allows proper fitment and ensures the system works as intended. The RAS® Mega-Duty kit will reduce squat and provide significant improvement vs the factory overload spring.
-
I wonder as well, why they would send me a text message with links to these suggested procedures totalling over $10,000 without even the slightest hint of how they arrived at these being necessary. -
.thumb.JPG.2c573de60d3a3a4407c7d92298db46dd.JPG)
By Grumpy Bear · Posted
https://precisionlubrication.com/articles/oil-filter-efficiency/ For them it is a problem of $$$$ and compliance. To cover both they have to lie from the heart. Government wants low waste oil numbers so the bar needs to be very low on contamination to met that requirement. Consumer wants cheap maintenance (perceived cost). Again requiring a low bar. OEM wants high margins at a cost effective warranty rate and lots of repeat customers. More low bar. Filter manufacture wants the same thing the OEM wants. See the pattern? Consumers are fickle and also want perfection requiring a HIGH bar. Inconsistent with all of the above. Consumers can be, when the put their minds to it, inquisitive, love winning arguments which requires some useful information to be available to support them. And this is where it gets sticky and the lies begin. Information needs a solid well grounded point of reference if we are to compare in a useful way. There is a standard for this. ISO 4548-12. This standard sets the particle size at a specific Beta ratio and darn few are faithful to its intent. If they don't state the test method they change the particle size or the Beta ratio to hit a perceived favorable standard. They obscure the information in a way as to prevent direct comparisons leaving the consumer with one method. UOA's with an ISO 4406 test result. Pricey and not allot of labs willing to do the work. Lobby work happens everywhere, not just at the seat of government. -
IF,IF,IF. If they cared about quality instead of profit and this applies to any company, what a concept.
-
-
GM-Trucks.com Clubs
-
Black Truck Club
Open Club · 612 members
-
White Truck Club
Open Club · 380 members
-
Canadian Owners Club
Open Club · 282 members
-
Red Truck Club
Open Club · 156 members
-
diesel 3.0
Open Club · 279 members
-
Texas Owner's Group
Open Club · 371 members
-
NorthSky Blue Club
Open Club · 118 members
-
Midwest Owner's Group
Open Club · 212 members
-
2015 Custom Sport Club
Open Club · 5 members
-
GM Snow Plowing Club HD
Closed Club · 14 members
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.