Jump to content

Chris' 04 Sierra 1500 Fun Daily Build


Chris

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 699
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

City called Bakersfield. Decent sized city and the 3rd smoggiest city in the US according to the EPA

 

Sent from my Samsung GS4 using Xparent Red Tapatalk 2

 

 

Posted

I am leaning towards spinning a whipple to 10 or so PSI. I will not get crazy until I get a new daily driver

Posted

If I move out of California I will turbo

 

Sent from my Samsung GS4 using Xparent Red Tapatalk 2

 

 

Posted

I liked what I saw with Silverado SS's and the STS but I will want the biggest turbo they offer. I asked black bear which I'm b3tter off with

 

Sent from my Samsung GS4 using Xparent Red Tapatalk 2

 

 

Posted

Is STS the company that makes a TT kit for GTO's? Those produce like 650-700 HP at the fly. That would be amazing

 

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Posted

Problem is from what I read on vette forums is the rear mount single turbo has lag.

 

Sent from my Samsung GS4 using Xparent Red Tapatalk 2

 

 

Posted

I am no expert on any type of forced induction, but it also depends on how big your turbo is. Not really sure of advantages or disadvantages of rear mount or front mount or any other type of turbo haha

 

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Posted

Bigger turbos put out more boost but are slower to spool. Rear mounts are away from thr engine and the exhaust has to get to the turbo then the compressed air charge has to go all the way to the front. So a little more lag. The plus to it is everything operates cooler

 

Sent from my Samsung GS4 using Xparent Red Tapatalk 2

 

 

Posted

I knew bout the size and it lagging, but I learned something about rear mount turbos just now!

 

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Posted
Problem is from what I read on vette forums is the rear mount single turbo has lag.

 

Sent from my Samsung GS4 using Xparent Red Tapatalk 2

 

Lag really has nothing to do with how much volume you have before the exhaust turbine, it depends on how smart you are picking a turbo. You experience lag with any FI set up, blowers as well. You can buy a smaller turbo it will scream down low, or a big nasty that won't make full boost until 4500rpm be super laggy but scream up top. Just like any other FI system you aren't going to make full power at all rpms, at least the turbo doesn't rob any power. Just takes micro seconds to kick in. Those who complain about lag didn't properly research the turbo the bought.

 

I would tend to stay under .80 a/r maybe a gt55.

 

My truck runs the smaller turbo in the valley, the big one doesnt start building boost until about 15psi is achieved.

 

Is a underhood system better? Yes of course but it will cost you almost twice as much and be alot more work. IMO STS are the best bang for your buck if you are trying to get to that magical 500hp line.

Posted

Or you can just build a 6.0L and get 500hp, but then you would never pass emissions

 

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,778
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    daveishi
    Newest Member
    daveishi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,020 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...