Jump to content

lift vs level


Recommended Posts

Posted

I want to get the front end up a bit and reading the other threads the RC leveling kit seems to be the forums choice. I looked on the RC website and saw they had a suspension lift of the same height. Question is this: Any benefit to the suspension lift over the leveling blocks? The $90 price difference doesn't matter if the suspension lift will be a better application. I will be putting bigger tires on after the lift/level too. Thanks!

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

The level kit will just lift the front of the truck. I am not as familiar with the 2014's, but the Rough Country will lift the front approx. 2" with the level kit.

 

Rough Country's lift kit include an additional front spacer, for another 1/2" of lift in the front, and a new block for the rear that will gain you approx. 1" in the rear.

 

That being said, again, I am not sure of the amount of rake in the new trucks. I know on my 2011 the 2.25" ReadyLift put the front and back exactly the same. Thus, I added the rear block to gain a little bit of rake back since I do haul and tow a trailer regularly.

 

I do not think that extra 1/2" in the front will allow for a larger tire than if you just had the 2" level. I could be wrong on that, though....

Posted

Here is my 2014 GMC Sierra Z71 with the rough country 2" leveling kit.

 

Before....

20131212_152146.jpg

 

 

After......

20140108_094119.jpg

 

 

And one more.....

20140108_094127.jpg

 

 

The angles I took the pictures at may not be the best, and the after pictures are in the same driveway, just the truck is turned around and it sitting on a slight.....very slight, uphill slope. So that may make a little difference...not sure. And its dirty....ignore that.

 

But anyway. I measured mine before and after in the exact same spot. Before the front was 36 1/4". After it was 38". So 1 3/4" lift to the front afterwards. Rear measures 39" both times, so it now sits approximately 1" lower in the front than back. In conclusion.....I'm happy, especially for $65 (installed myself).....however, If I could do it again I would get the 2.5" kit for $150 or whatever it is. I'd like some more height to it and I will be putting some larger tires on it when these wear out...not sure size yet. Then agian I am coming from a 2500HD, so this truck seems almost like sitting in a car to me. I've got a buddy with a '14 Sierra Z71 with the 2.25" Ready Lift kit on his and he has 305/55/20 Nitto Terra Grapplers on his. He said he had to do only a little bit of trimming to the front and he has no rubbing issues. ????

 

Hope this helps a little bit.

Posted

I have ordered the lift kit. I don't plan to change wheels, just larger tires. The stock z-71 tires (per chevy.com) are 265/65r/18. What would be the largest tires I can get without rubbing? I don't want to cut into a new truck. I will be running these tires year round in Michigan, so what would be some suggestions for tires?

Posted

I said the same thing about cutting anything; you shouldn't need to at all. if your sticking with the stock wheels I would go with 33" tires. I believe the most common tire size for that would be 275/70R18 that would give you a 33.2" x 10.8"

 

I'm in Texas so I cant help you on tires for snow. Our year round tire and your year round tire I'm sure is a lot different

 

With the set up I have I'm going to attempt to fit a 34" mud tire on my stock 18" wheels just to have a set to switch out from time to time

Posted

Thanks for the info Kuug.

 

DH2014- what size are the tires you have on your truck? 275/70R/18? That's the look I'm going for. Not to much, but you can tell its not stock.

Posted

Here's mine after a 2.5 inche RC lift and 33 inch BFGs.

 

Truck looks great DH!

 

Here's mine after a 2.5 inche RC lift and 33 inch BFGs.

 

Truck looks great DH!

 

Here's mine after a 2.5 inche RC lift and 33 inch BFGs.

 

Truck looks great DH!

Posted

Thanks TXGrantDuke. I love the way it drives, wasn't happy about the mpg loss, a little more than I expected, but 16-18 still isn't bad. Now it's time for assist steps and bed lighting!

 

I also like being able to pull up next to a Ford and look down on them.... I hated it when a Ford is taller than my truck.

Posted

I was looking at getting the 2" leveling kit. There is an option for aluminum or steel control arms. What do I have? It's a LT Double Cab 4X4 non Z71.. Thanks guys.

 

Tapatalk via Moto X

 

Posted

It's to cold for all that. I'm sitting inside warm waiting to place my order. :-) I guess I'll have to wait till tomorrow then. Did they just decide to make some with aluminum and some steel?

 

Tapatalk via Moto X

 

Posted

Did any of you that installed the RC front leveling kit have the front end realigned afterwards? I've talked to several truck shops around town and they tell me I will need to have an alignment done afterwards. One went as far as to tell be the leveling kit will stiffin up the front and make it ride rougher.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,980
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Fishboat
    Newest Member
    Fishboat
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 523 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  
    • Thank You.   So far my new ride is making me look like a genius for going with the 3.0L, as my first fuel refill occurred over three weeks from when I took delivery.  This engine combination is very amazing.  So far no issues and had not done a regen yet.
    • I am curious as to how much fluid you put back in the transmission ( assuming you had replaced the filter to compare to my findings ) and then went through the process of warming up the trans before pulling the check plug to drain out the excess and if you measured how much came back out.    I just found it surprising that some claimed a certain amount less fluid being put in and then draining some back out. The attitude of the truck as per if the surface is level and how the trucks stance is would make quite a difference since the check plug is right at the front of the transmission. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...